Assignment 2.2: Justification Report - Part 2

Unacceptable Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D

Fair 70-79% C

Proficient 80-89% B

Exemplary 90-100% A

ENG315-A3-1 1. Include and revise the sections from Assignment 2.1 (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods) per instructor suggestions.

Points Range:0 (0%) - 13.49(8.99%)

Did not submit or incompletely included and revised the sections from Assignment 2.1 (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods) per instructor suggestions.

Points Range:13.5 (9%) - 15.74(10.49%)

Insufficiently included and revised the sections from Assignment 2.1 (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods) per instructor suggestions.

Points Range:15.75 (10.5%) - 17.99 (11.99%)

Partially included and revised the sections from Assignment 2.1 (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods) per instructor suggestions.

Points Range:18 (12%) - 20.24(13.49%)

Satisfactorily included and revised the sections from Assignment 2.1 (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods) per instructor suggestions.

Points Range:20.25 (13.5%) - 22.5 (15%)

Thoroughly included and revised the sections from Assignment 2.1 (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods) per instructor suggestions.

ENG315-A3-2 2. Research the two (2) alternatives (i.e., possible solutions) identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Record bibliographic information during research.

Points Range:0 (0%) - 13.49(8.99%)

Did not submit or incompletely researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e., possible solutions) identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Did not submit or incompletely recorded bibliographic information during research.

Points Range:13.5 (9%) - 15.74(10.49%)

Insufficiently researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e., possible solutions) identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Insufficiently recorded bibliographic information during research.

Points Range:15.75 (10.5%) - 17.99 (11.99%)

Partially researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e., possible solutions) identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Partially recorded bibliographic information during research.

Points Range:18 (12%) - 20.24(13.49%)

Satisfactorily researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e., possible solutions) identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Satisfactorily recorded bibliographic information during research.

Points Range:20.25 (13.5%) - 22.5 (15%)

Thoroughly researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e., possible solutions) identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Thoroughly recorded bibliographic information during research.

ENG315-A3-3 3. Use what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.

Points Range:0 (0%) - 13.48(8.98%)

Did not submit or incompletely used what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.

Points Range:13.5 (9%) - 15.73(10.48%)

Insufficiently used what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.

Points Range:15.75 (10.5%) - 17.98 (11.98%)

Partially used what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.

Points Range:18 (12%) - 20.23(13.48%)

Satisfactorily used what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.

Points Range:20.25 (13.5%) - 22.5 (15%)

Thoroughly used what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.

ENG315-A3-4 4. Organize the assignment by your criteria. Explain in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Next, explain how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.

Points Range:0 (0%) - 8.98(5.99%)

Did not submit or incompletely organized the assignment by your criteria. Did not submit or incompletely explained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Did not submit or incompletely explained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.

Points Range:9 (6%) - 10.48(6.99%)

Insufficiently organized the assignment by your criteria. Insufficiently explained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Insufficiently explained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.

Points Range:10.5 (7%) - 11.98(7.99%)

Partially organized the assignment by your criteria. Partially explained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Partially explained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.

Points Range:12 (8%) - 13.48(8.99%)

Satisfactorily organized the assignment by your criteria. Satisfactorily explained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Satisfactorily explained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.

Points Range:13.5 (9%) - 15(10%)

Thoroughly organized the assignment by your criteria. Thoroughly explained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Thoroughly explained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.

ENG315-A3-5 5. Briefly summarize in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternatives section.

Points Range:0 (0%) - 8.98(5.99%)

Did not submit or incompletely summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternatives section.

Points Range:9 (6%) - 10.48(6.99%)

Insufficiently summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternatives section.

Points Range:10.5 (7%) - 11.98(7.99%)

Partially summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternatives section.

Points Range:12 (8%) - 13.48(8.99%)

Satisfactorily summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternatives section.

Points Range:13.5 (9%) - 15(10%)

Thoroughly summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternatives section.

ENG315-A3-6 6. Include a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative

Points Range:0 (0%) - 8.97(5.98%)

Did not submit or incompletely Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.

Points Range:9 (6%) - 10.47(6.98%)

Insufficiently Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.

Points Range:10.5 (7%) - 11.97(7.98%)

Partially Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.

Points Range:12 (8%) - 13.47(8.98%)

Satisfactorily Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.

Points Range:13.5 (9%) - 15(10%)

Thoroughly Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.

ENG315-A3-7 7. Two (2) References provided.

Points Range:0 (0%) - 4.5 (3%)

No references provided.

Points Range:4.5 (3%) - 5.25(3.5%)

Insufficiently included the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Points Range:5.25 (3.5%) - 6 (4%)

Partially included the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Points Range:6 (4%) - 6.75 (4.5%)

Satisfactorily included the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Points Range:6.75 (4.5%) - 7.5(5%)

Thoroughly included required number of references; all references high quality choices.

ENG315-A3-8 8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements.

Points Range:0 (0%) - 17.99(11.99%)

More than 8 errors present.

Points Range:18 (12%) - 20.99(13.99%)

7-8 errors present.

Points Range:21 (14%) - 23.99(15.99%)

5-6 errors present.

Points Range:24 (16%) - 26.99(17.99%)

3-4 errors present.

Points Range:27 (18%) - 30 (20%)

0-2 errors present.