Head-to-Toe Assessment For this assignment, perform a complete head-to-toe assessment on one of your chosen participants. Your analysis should include the following: Topical headings to delineate systems. For any system for which you do not have equip

Assignment

components

Unsatisfactory

1

Emerging

2

Proficient

3

Exemplary

4

Score

Incorporated topical headings to

delineate systems.

Incorporated topical headings to delineate

systems. Details are vague or nonexistent.

Incorporated topical headings to delineate

systems. Some examples used, but there is a lack of detail.

Incorporated topical

headings to delineate systems. Explanations were good but could be more detailed..

Incorporated topical

headings to delineate systems. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas.

_ of 20 points

Analyzed and

described how portions of the assessment would be conducted without certain equipment.

Did not analyze and describe

how portions of the assessment would be conducted without certain equipment, or the details are vague or nonexistent.

Analyzed and described

how portions of the assessment would be conducted without certain equipment. Some examples used, but there is a lack of detail.

Analyzed and described

how portions of the assessment would be conducted without certain equipment. Explanations were good but could be more detailed..

Analyzed and described

how portions of the assessment would be conducted without certain equipment. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas.

of 20 points

Provided a detailed review of each

system with normal

and abnormal findings and included normal laboratory findings for client age.

Did not provide a detailed review of each system

with normal and abnormal

findings and did not include normal laboratory findings for client age. Details are vague or nonexistent.

Provided a detailed review of each system

with normal and

abnormal findings and included normal laboratory findings for client age. Some examples used, but there is a lack of detail.

Provided a detailed review of each system with normal

and abnormal findings and

included normal laboratory findings for client age. Explanations were good but could include more detail and use of external resources to support findings.

Provided a detailed

review of each system with normal and abnormal findings and included normal laboratory findings for client age. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas.

of 16 points

Analyzed and

explained age-specific risk reduction health screen and immunizations.

Did not analyze and explaine

age-specific risk reduction health screen and immunizations. Details

are vague or nonexistent.

Analyzed and explained

age-specific risk reduction health screen and immunizations. Some examples used, but there is a lack of detail.

Analyzed and explained

age-specific risk reduction health screen and immunizations.

Explanations were good but

could be more detailed..

Analyzed and explained

age-specific risk reduction health screen and immunizations. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas.

of 16 points

Provided

expectations of normal findings and indicated abnormal findings in review of systems.

Did not provide expectations of

normal findings and did not indicate abnormal findings in review of systems. Details are vague or nonexistent.

Provided expectations

of normal findings and indicated abnormal findings in review of systems. Some examples used, but there is a lack of detail.

Provided expectations of

normal findings and indicated abnormal findings in review of systems. Explanations were good but could be more detailed.

Provided expectations

of normal findings and indicated abnormal findings in review of systems. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas.

of 16

points

Analyzed and

described the differential diagnosis (disease) associated with possible abnormal findings.

Did not Analyze and describe

the differential diagnosis (disease) associated with possible abnormal findings. Details are vague or nonexistent.

Analyzed and described

the differential diagnosis

(disease) associated with possible abnormal findings. Some examples used, but there is a lack of detail.

Analyzed and described the

differential diagnosis (disease) associated with possible abnormal findings. Explanations were good but could be more detailed.

Analyzed and described

the differential diagnosis

(disease) associated with possible abnormal findings. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas.

of 16

points

Designed a plan of

care including nursing diagnosis, interventions, evaluation.

Designed a plan of care

including nursing diagnosis, interventions, evaluation. Details are vague or nonexistent.

Designed a plan of care

including nursing diagnosis, interventions, evaluation. Some examples used, but there is a lack of detail.

Designed a plan of care

including nursing diagnosis, interventions, evaluation. Explanations were good but could be more detailed.

Designed a plan of care

including nursing diagnosis, interventions, evaluation. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas.

of 16

points

Discussed pharmacological treatments that can be used to address health issues for this client.

Did not discuss pharmacological treatments that can be used to address health issues for this client. Details are vague or nonexistent.

Discussed pharmacological treatments that can be used to address health issues for this client. Some examples used, but there is a lack of detail.

Discussed pharmacological treatments that can be used to address health issues for this client. Explanations were good but could be more detailed.

Discussed pharmacological treatments that can be used to address health issues for this client. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas.

of 20

points

Included evidenced based practice strategies for health promotion.

Did not include evidenced based practice strategies for health promotion. Details are vague or nonexistent.

Included evidenced based practice strategies for health promotion. Some examples used, but there is a lack of detail.

Included evidenced based practice strategies for health promotion. Explanations were good but could be more detailed.

Included evidenced based practice strategies for health promotion. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas.

of 20

points

Written

components.

Introduction is limited or

missing entirely.

Poorly organized document.

Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely.

Conclusion is limited or missing entirely.

Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension.

No attempt at APA

formatting.

Introduction is present

but incomplete or underdeveloped.

Poorly organized document that interferes with readability and comprehension.

Transitions are sporadic. Conclusion is present, but incomplete or underdeveloped.

Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, or sentence structure that somewhat interfere with readability or comprehension.

APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but errors are significant.

Introduction has a clear

opening, provides background information, and states the topic.

Loosely organized document that may have to be inferred.

Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas. Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.

Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension.

APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but few errors are present.

Introduction catches the

reader’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background information, and clearly states the topic.

Well organized document with an appropriate introduction.

Transitions are thoughtful and clearly show how ideas relate. Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights.

Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout that helps establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic.

APA format is used throughout when appropriate or called for.

of 20 points

Total Score

of 180

points