5 to 8 pages S P I paper

narutoyy8

spa_data_file.pdf

Home >Business & Finance homework help >Management homework help >5 to 8 pages S P I paper

Report

Page #

Your

Points

Report

Page #

Your

Points

Report

Page #

Your

Points

94-95 2 15 97 3 1

58-60 95 3 92 1 97-98 3 2

95 3 109 1 97-98 2 3

58-60 96 3 84 92 109 2 97-98 5 4

58-60 96 3 84 92 109 3 97-98 5 5

58-60 96 3 84 92 109 3 97-98 5 6

97-98 3 7

97-98 5 8

96 3 92-93 2 97-98 3 9

83-85 5 10

83-85 5 11

92-95 2 97-98 3 12

80-81 4 33 36 4 94-96 3 1

94 2 38-39 2 104-105 2 2

81 5 106 1 3

30 107 2 97-98 3 4

64 2 107 1 99-101 3 5

62-63 81 4 37 4 99-101 3 6

37 1 99-101 3 7

99-101 3 8

AMD Intel

CATEGORY: SOCIAL

LA7

Workers with high incidence or high risk of diseases related to

LA8

Health and safety covered in union agreements.

Minimum notice periods regarding operational changes,

LA5

Percentage of total workforce represented in formal joint

LA6

Number and rates of injury, occupational diseases, lost days,

LA2

Benefits provided to full-time employees that are not provided to

LA3

Return to work and retention rates after parental leave by

LA4

HR12

Number of grievances about human rights impacts filed,

SUBCATEGORY: LABOR PRACTICES (LA)

LA1

Total number and rates of new employee hires and employee

HR10

Percentage of new suppliers screened using human rights

HR11

Significant actual and potential negative human rights impacts in

Number and percentage of significant investment agreements and

The social dimension of sustainability concerns the impacts the

organization has on the social systems within which it operates. The

Social Category has four sub-categories: 1) Human Rights, 2) Labor

Practices and Decent Work, 3) ŸŸProduct Responsibility, and 4)

Society.

HR7

Percentage of security personnel trained in the organization’s

HR8

Number of incidents of violations involving rights of indigenous

HR9

Operations and suppliers identified in which the right to exercise

HR5

Operations and suppliers identified as having significant risk for

HR6

Operations and suppliers identified as having significant risk for

Enter 5 points if numerical data is given for multiple years and there is a positive (improving) trend ; or the data was at the 100%

maximum this year and last year when maximum represents best performance (e.g., 100% suppliers screened for sustainability

practices); or the data was at the 0% minimum this year and last year when minimum represents best performance (e.g.,

employee fatalities, environmental fines).

HR2

Hours of employee training on human rights policies or

HR3

Number of incidents of discrimination and corrective actions

HR4

SUBCATEGORY: HUMAN RIGHTS (HR)

HR1

Number and percentage of operations that have been subject to

Lexmark

The SPA (Sustainability Performance Assessment) System is copyrighted by Dr. Dorothy Paun. Do not use for

purposes outside of this course without the prior permission of Dr. Paun.

SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT (SPA) SYSTEM Version 7.7

Enter 0 points if there is no information about the indicator in the sustainability report.

Enter 1 point if there is a very brief mention of the indicator. Brief means no detail or specific information is provided and no

numerical data is given.

Enter 2 points if there is a discussion (details or specific information is provided) about the indicator and no numerical data is

given.

Enter 3 points if numerical data is given for the current year only.

Enter 4 points if numerical data is given for multiple years and there is a negative (worsening) trend or no apparent trend .

42 3 102-103 3 9

55-58 2 41-42 3 102-103 2 10

56 3 41-42 2 103-105 3 11

80 5 26 36 4 94-96 3 12

108 1 13

83-85 5 14

83-85 5 15

64-65 3 97-98 3 16

19-30 2 60-61 2 110-111 3 1

61 0 110-111 3 2

61 0 110-111 2 3

61 0 110-111 3 4

10 26 4 5

110-111 3 6

112 1 113 3 7

94 2 112 3 8

94 0 14 110-111 3 9

40-44 60-66 3 67 2 115-120 2 1

67 2 115-116 2 2

72 73 3 14 2 13-14 3 3

97 3 14 3 13-14 2 4

110 1 5

74 75 82 4 16 17 5 121-123 3 6

97 3 10 0 13-14 3 7

88 5 64 10k 4 13-14 3 8

83-85 5 9

83-85 5 10

83-85 0 11

3.0 2.6 3.7

1.5 2.2 3.1

50% 83% 83%

AMD Intel

PR3

Type and percent of product and service information required by the

PR4

Number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations

PR5

SUBCATEGORY: PRODUCT RESPONSIBILITY (PR)

PR1

Percentage of significant product and service categories for

PR2

Number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations and

Percentage of new suppliers screened using labor practices

LA15

Significant actual and potential negative impacts for labor

PERCENT OF INDICATORS REPORTED (Transparency)

LABOR PRACTICES INDICATORS

HUMAN RIGHTS INDICATORS AMD Intel

Communication and training on anti-corruption policies and procedures.

SO5

Confirmed incidents of corruption and actions taken.

SO1

Percentage of operations with implemented local community

SO2

Operations with significant actual and potential negative impacts

SO3

SO11

Number and percentage of operations assessed for risks related to

SO4

Number of grievances about impacts on society filed,

Monetary value of significant fines and total number of non-

SO9

Percentage of new suppliers screened using criteria for impacts

SO10

Significant actual and potential negative impacts on society in

SO6

Value of political contributions, by country and

SO7

Number of legal actions for anti-competitive behavior, anti-

SO8

PR8

Number of substantiated complaints regarding breaches of

PR9

Monetary value of significant fines for non-compliance with laws

SUBCATEGORY: SOCIETY (SO)

Results of surveys measuring customer satisfaction.

PR6

Sale of banned or disputed products.

PR7

Number of incidents of non-compliance with regulations and

LA16

Number of grievances about labor practices filed, addressed,

LA12

Composition of governance bodies and breakdown of employees

LA13

Ratio of basic salary and remuneration of women to men by

LA14

Hours of employee training, by gender and by employee category.

LA10

Programs for skills management and lifelong learning that

LA11

Percentage of employees receiving regular performance and

LA9

MEAN POINTS (Performance)

WEIGHTED MEAN * (Transparent Performance)

IntelAMD

Lexmark

3.4 2.7 2.8

1.7 2.6 2.1

50% 94% 75%

2.0 2.3 2.9

0.2 1.0 2.6

11% 44% 89%

3.5 3.2 2.6

1.9 2.6 1.6

55% 82% 64%

3.2 2.8 3.0

1.4 2.2 2.3

44% 79% 77%

WEIGHTED MEAN * (Transparent Performance)

PERCENT OF INDICATORS REPORTED (Transparency)

MEAN POINTS (Performance)

HUMAN RIGHTS, LABOR PRACTICES, PRODUCT

RESPONSIBILITY, & SOCIETY SUMMARY STATISTICS AMD Intel

MEAN POINTS (Performance)

SOCIETY INDICATORS AMD Intel

PERCENT OF INDICATORS REPORTED (Transparency)

PRODUCT RESPONSIBILITY INDICATORS AMD Intel

MEAN POINTS (Performance)

PERCENT OF INDICATORS REPORTED (Transparency)

WEIGHTED MEAN * (Transparent Performance)

PERCENT OF INDICATORS REPORTED (Transparency)

WEIGHTED MEAN * (Transparent Performance)

MEAN POINTS (Performance)

* WEIGHTED MEAN (Transparent Performance) is calculated by multiplying mean points times the percent of indicators

reported).

Lexmark