help me
EJISE Editorial for Volume 19 Issue 1
Shaun Pather
From the time of the first commercial application of computers in the mid 1900s, organizations of all sizes and
types have developed an increasing dependency on Information Systems (IS) to achieve their goals. Whilst
the early literature tended to focus on the business sector in the main, the pervasiveness of Information and
Communication Technologies, spurred by the advent of the Internet, has resulted in a complex array of IS
studies delving into problems across the societal spectrum. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems
Evaluation (EJISE) continues to play an important role in this regard as evidenced by the diverse scope of
research problems addressed in our published papers. The broader IS research community continues to
address questions regarding new ways to in designing and building IS. In contrast, the EJISE scope focuses on
research relevant to Information Systems evaluation, with an emphasis on the organisational and
management problems. The Editorial team of EJISE is thus pleased to continue to uphold its mandate in this
regard with the publication of this issue.
The current issue brings to the fore the complexity of evaluating IS in the modern networked world. Given the
ubiquity of technology researchers will continue to be challenged to be creative to resolve complex IS
evaluation challenges. Vlad Krotov examines the application of regression analysis in the realm of IT Cost
Benchmarking. The paper argues that important capital allocation decisions should not be made without an
understanding of the theoretical and methodological issues in relation to IT cost benchmarking using IT
managerial control ratios. The paper posits that adopting a regression-based approach to benchmarking IT
costs augers for a more robust approach to determining and interpreting a company’s position relative to the
industry norm.
EJISE continues to receive submissions which interrogate IS management problems within a cloud
environment. In this issue Deep Ray introspects an integrated perspective of cloud adoption, and in doing so
consolidates the diverse examination of the issue from the extant literature. The paper makes a contributing
by providing a holistic framework for businesses to use to assess prospective cloud adoption.
Given the imperatives of an inter-networked era the value of agile methodologies in systems development are
increasingly important. Scrum is one of such methodologies. The paper by Deon Takpuie and Maureen Tanner
investigates the characteristics of Scrum team members to successfully transfer tacit knowledge during agile
software projects. The paper which focuses on expertise of the human element in IS projects, presents a
model of the characteristics of Scrum team members which facilitate the transfer of tacit knowledge during a
software project.
The title of this issue’s next paper IT Project Selection: Politics, Experience and good Friends by Keld Pedersen
will be bound to evoke an imaginative response in the minds of EJISE readers. Pedersen rightfully argues that
selecting the optimal portfolio of IT projects is becoming increasingly important as the dependency on IT for
organizational performance increases. The paper hones in on the problems in large and complex
organizations related to selecting the most appropriate IT projects. The empirical findings are structured using
a model with five components: Focus areas and principles, formal organization, informal organization,
decision-making behavior and the decision-making context. In tying the findings back to the creative title the
author argues that IT portfolio managers use a decision-making process based on intuition and experience,
mental simulation and the exploitation of personal networks.
The final paper in this issue by authors Chaysin, Daengdej and Tangjitprom extends the debate on IT
investment evaluation. The paper tackles the rather complex issue of what is the most appropriate approach
to measure the return on IT investment and its contribution to business benefits. The authors argue that none
of the mainly traditional financial approaches are suitable in practice. For example, as a result of the rapid
change in markets and increased demands of shareholder value, the relevance of approaches such as Net
Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) are questioned. With the benefit of an extensive
introspection and analysis of current approaches, the authors identify five key reasons why a response to the
ISSN 1566-6379 1 ©ACPIL
Reference this paper as Pather S, “Editorial for EJISE” The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation Volume 19
Issue 1 2016, (pp1-2), available online at www.ejise.com
Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation Volume 19 Issue 1 2016
vexing issue of investment evaluation is not forthcoming, and thereby providing a foundation for future
studies to explore further.
Finally, I must once again record our since appreciations to the reviewers of the papers in this issue. Without
their unstinting support, our commitment to independent assessment and review of the scientific endeavor,
cannot be upheld.
Shaun Pather
EJISE Editor
www.ejise.com 2 ©ACPIL
Copyright of Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation is the property of Academic Conferences & Publishing International Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.