Policy Proposal Project

profileStallion90
jumpstart.docx

Abstract

The question under consideration is what can be done to expedite pending policies and bills to provide adequate funding, insurance coverage, access to needed services and elimination of mental health disparities for those suffering in California. The mental health services act (MHSA) was passed into law in 2004 and enables the California state department of health to possess state of the art equipment to deal with mental health. Despite its usefulness, the act needs some amendments to better its effectiveness. The answer to this query depends on the point of view from which it is considered. Although the various stakeholders’ points of views will be taken into account, we will consider the merit of the various proposed solutions principally from the vantage point of health care institutions in the State of California as represented by the Mental Health America of California (MHAC), California Department of HealthCare Services (DCHCS) (LIST OTHER STAKEHOLDERS) , California Health and Hospital Association, 2016) In this article, we seek to review medical malpractice reform strategies and come to a conclusion about the most feasible way forward based on a Kingdon streams analysis of the problem, policy opportunities, and political environment and feasibility. We will consider tort reform, medical error reduction, and the establishment of expert medical panels and/or health courts in detail. We conclude that medical error reform is a politically expedient policy agenda approach that will reduce medical malpractice premiums in California. Through this association, people with mental complications will now be able to receive medication other than mere prescription of drugs.

MHAC

Top of Form

Client:

The Client is “Mental Health America of California (MHAC)” which is also known as Mental Health Association of California. The main objective of this organization is to ensure people of all ages, sexual orientation, gender, ethnicity, etc. who experience mental health challenges, receive all services required without denial of certain benefits, services, rights, or opportunities based on their disabilities (Mental Health Association in California, 2015). The organization is to achieve its objectives through education and advocacy. The MHAC envisions to implement the Mental Health Service Act in full letter and spirit. The MHAC  not only provides education and advocacy to the state institutions and people of California about Mental Illness and its cure but also ensures that "there is adequate funding, elimination of mental health disparities, insurance coverage and access to needed services" (Mental Health Association in California, 2015).  The purpose of the MHAC is to look for more than mere medication and prescriptions to treat persons with mental illness

Problem Statement:

The state of California provided additional options of care to people, other than mere medication and prescription drugs. However, what can be done to fill the loopholes and institutional voids needed to be filled in order to better serve those suffering with mental health the adequate funding, elimination of mental health disparities, insurance coverage and access to needed services of MSHA?

 Kingdon Analysis:

Problem stream:

The situation is serious. Mental health is a matter of utmost importance for each and every individual. The real problem is not the mental health disorder itself as former US president Bill Clinton once said, "Mental illness is nothing to be ashamed of, but stigma and bias shame us all" ( CalMHSA, 2016).

According to the report issued by the California Healthcare Foundation named as "Mental Health Care in California: Painting a Picture", almost one in every six  California Adults  has a mental health need while nearly 1 in 20  suffers from  severe mental illness that makes it difficult to live a normal and healthy life. The rate is alarmingly high among children as every 1 in 13 suffers from the mental illness (MHCF, 2013).

The report provides a perfect overview of mental health system in the state of California as it highlights a host of issues regarding mental health disorders in California. Some of the major findings of the report are:

· The rate of SED among children varied slightly by regions while presence of SMI among adults ranged from high of 5.3% in San Joaquin Valley to the low of 4.3% in Bay Area.

· Rates of SED among children varied slightly among various ethnicities as Whites were lowest at 6.9% while Latino Americans were highest at 8%.

· The rate of SED was higher among low income level as it was recorded at 10% while the state average was 7.6%.

· Females were more prone to mental illness than males.

· The age group of 25-44 were having the larger proportion of mental illness.

· The rates of SMI among adults were varied significantly among different ethnic groups as Asians were at lowest and native among the highest sides.

· The suicide rates in California were stable and lower than overall USA rates.

· The Suicide rates were significantly higher for the age group above 45 as compared to young ones.

· The suicide rates are three times higher among males (15.3%) than females (4.6).

· The whites has the highest suicide rate (16.7).

·  More than 60% of adults with any mental illness and 40% of those with a serious mental illness did not receive outpatient care, inpatient care, or medication treatment to address their condition.

·  Prescription medication was the most common treatment received by both groups.  

· California county mental health programs are responsible for providing mental health services for those who are uninsured. These services are paid for by a combination of state, county, and federal funds. The number of Californians served by this system fell 11% between 2006 and 2010.

As one of these findings stated that prescription medicine was the most common treatment received, yet on the other hand, some people do not bother to seek any kind of treatment. This is a major problem which needs to be addressed urgently by the state authorities and advocacies. The state of California has the infrastructure and specialized systems to provide extensive treatment programs. The most significant policy in this regard is the California Mental Health Service Act.

Politics Stream

Stakeholders:

1) Patients - The patients of mental health disorders are the most important stakeholders. The problem in this regard is that the most of the patients ignore the disorder in the early stages or that of mild one such as depression or anxiety which needed to be taken care of properly instead of just taking few medicines. The education and awareness of the disorder and its treatment towards patients is required for the better perspectives.

2) Families - The families of the patients are another group which are not only important stakeholders in the policy making but also major factor in the better treatment of patients. The family member can provide much needed support, guidance and assistance to patients for their quick recovery and rehabilitation in various cases.

3) State Government - The state government is responsible for the provision of necessary facilities and measures for the treatment of the mental health disorders. The government is also responsible for making the shifts and changes in the policies to develop the mechanism and system which is best suited towards the needs of the treatments.

4) Mental Health Service Authority- the Mental Health Service Authority is the initiative taken by the state of California after the assembly passed the bill in 2004 for providing the extensive system and funding for the treatment of mentally disordered patients across state. It is the responsibility of MHSA to look for the resources and implementation of its policies throughout the state.

5) Department of Health Care Services– In 2012, Legislature eliminated the Department of Mental Health and instead transferred all responsibilities of managing the issues related to mental health care to Department of Health Care Service. Hence it is the important stakeholders whose actions and measures are very pertinent for the cause (MHSD, 2016).

6) Providers - The providers include all the stakeholders who are responsible for the provision of treatment and diagnosis to patients. They include Doctors, therapists, psychologists, nurses and pharmacists. The role of these service providers is very imminent for the better treatment of illness.

7) Legislature- The legislative of California did a fantastic job in 2004 by passing the Proposition 63 which paved the way for Mental Health Service Act. The active role of legislatures is also needed in future to overview and improvise the policies in this regard.

8) Organizations - The role of the NGOs and associations advocating and educating mental health problems among people is highly appreciated. It is also a matter of great concern that these organization receives donations and funding which are needed to be utilized properly.

9) Media- The media has the great responsibility of educating the people about the mental health care. It is the media which can better guide the people to know about the treatment methods and procedures other than medication especially in the state of California.

Policy Stream – Reaction to a crisis

On November 2004, voters in the U.S. state of California passed Proposition 63, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA), which has been designed to expand and transform California’s county mental health service systems. The MHSA is funded by imposing an additional one percent tax on individual. Then-Assemblyman Darrell Steinberg and Rusty Selix, executive director of the Mental Health Association in California, led the initiative by collecting at minimum 373,816 signatures, along with financial ($4.3 million) and vocal support from stakeholders (MHSA, 2004).

The MHSA is a very powerful act which basically empowers the state of California to possess the extensive state of the art systems for the treatment of mental health disorders. It provides the people of California to look for more than prescriptions and medication. The act is actually a solution to the problem of mental health disorders. As Mental Health Service Authority has the funding of about 60,000 taxpayers of California exclusively for the treatment of mental health disorders. The initiative is to cover those people who are not insured and enrolled in Medi-Cal.

The MHSA has the 6 basic components and the funds are specifically allocated for the 6 areas which are fixed. These six areas are:

· Community program planning and administration (10%)

· Community services and supports (45%)

· Capital (buildings) and information technology (IT) (10%)

· Education and training (human resources) (10%)

· Prevention and early intervention (20%)

· Innovation (5%)

The MHSA has the duty to make sure that funds are being properly distributed and used across the state. The MHSA also controls, eradicates the mental health disorders and formulates the programs to expand the service towards the deserved ones in the state.

Implementation of MHSA:

The MHSA has functioned since 2004 but the mental health care system is still not at full potential. There is no doubt in the fact that MHSA is a very extensive program which provides proper health care for mental health disorders. It provides the necessary facilities in public hospitals while engaging psychiatrists and psychologists to provide proper treatment at the expense of state and taxpayers. Thus, MHSA is needed to act fully and strictly upon the rights and treatment of people suffering with mental health disorders in are receiving the best possible treatment in California.

Policy Proposal:

The state of California has done a great job to the service of mentally disordered underprivileged patients by implementing the MHSA in 2004. The Authority has provided the mental health care facilities to people ever since its existence.  The MHSA has reached out to people who were either not enrolled in Medi-Cal or uninsured in order to get them into treatment programs and facilities. The state of California definitely provided additional options of care to people, other than mere medication and prescription drugs.

However, it is also felt that there are certain loopholes and institutional voids needed to be filled in order to better serve the cause. For this purpose, MHSA needs certain amendments and changes in order to improve the efficiency and quality of the service. First of all, the legislature and the government should appoint a board or authorities to have a check and balance on MHSA in order to implement the provisions of the act fully and in true spirits. Secondly, there is need of mass communication and awareness campaign among people to provide knowledge about disorders and their treatments available in the state. Lastly, therapies and rehabilitation programs should be made part of the MHSA facilities or should be funded by the MHSA more comprehensively.

Bibliography

"Mental Health." Department of Health Care Services. N.P., n.d. Web. 19 June 2016.

 "California Health Care Foundation -- Health Care That Works for All Californians." California Health Care Foundation. N.P., n.d. Web. 19 June 2016.

 "Mental Health Association in California." Mental Health Association in California. N.P., 2015. Web. 19 June 2016.

 "Mental Health Association in California." Mental Health Association in California. N.P., 2015. Web. 19 June 2016.

  "CalMHSA" CalMHSA. Nap. n.d. Web. 19 June 2016.Bottom of Form