Windows Server Proposal Paper
John_matt
rubric_name.docRubric Name: Windows Server Deployment Proposal Rubric
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria |
Level 4 |
Level 3 |
Level 2 |
Level 1 |
|
Design and Accuracy |
30 points Design choices are explained and are reasonable. Technical information is reasonably accurate. Any specific technical information is based on research/textbook as appropriate. Assumptions are identified/described. The overall design is “unified” (limited inconsistencies). Explanation of business/technical reasons for decisions provided |
23 points Design choices are justified. Some technical information is missing. Assumptions are not clear. Design in not unified. |
16 points Design choices are limited. Technical information is inappropriate. Limited evidence business or technical decisions |
9 points Design choices are not justified. Technical information is misrepresented. Assumptions are not documented. |
|
Topic Coverage (Level of Detail) |
20 points All of the topics are addressed to a reasonable depth. The paper includes a sufficient level of technical detail. Paper provides manpower/scheduling estimates |
15 points Some topics are missing and/or not explained properly. Missing information on manpower estimates. |
10 points Topics are present but not explained properly. Information in scheduling/manpower estimate is misrepresented. |
5 points Most topics are not present. Chart for manpower and estimates is missing. |
|
Organization, Quality, Grammar and Spelling |
20 points Submission is organized logically. Ideas are presented coherently. Writing style is appropriate. There are very few errors in grammar or spelling |
15 points Paper has a couple misspellings and/or grammatical errors and/or is 1 or 2 pages outside the assigned length. |
10 points Paper has several misspellings and/or grammatical errors and/or is approximately 3 pages outside the assigned length. |
5 points Work has significant spelling errors and/or grammatical errors and/or is 4 or more pages outside the assigned length. |
|
Paper Requirements |
16 points Formatting requirements met. Paper length requirements met. At least one diagram used. Title page provided |
12 points Formatting is not proper but the length of the paper is met. Diagram is present. Title page provided. |
8 points Formatting is met but paper does not have adequate length. Diagram is misrepresented. |
4 points Formatting requirements are not met. Paper is does not meet length requirements. No diagram is present. |
|
Citation and Quotations |
14 points Any external sources were cited/quoted. Citations and quotations used appropriately. APA format followed properly for citations. At least one non-textbook, non-LabSim, non-Wikipedia resource referenced |
11 points Student presents information in logical sequence which reader can follow. There are at least 3 references, but they either lack variety or APA format is not followed. |
7 points Reader has difficulty following paper because student jumps around. There are 3 or more references with perhaps some variety but APA format may not have been followed. |
3 points Sequence of information is difficult to follow and there are less than 3 references. |
|
Overall Score |
Level 4 19 or more |
Level 3 14 or more |
Level 2 9 or more |
Level 1 0 or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
