Statistics with Excel

profiledjpro1990
book1.xlsx

#3

1)
2)
3)
4)
5)

#4

obs Confusitron Framis Sum
1) 1 Vlookup Table Confusitron Vlookup Table Framis
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 2)
9
10
11
12
13
14
15 Graph Here
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 3)
29 <==Expected value Theoretical Approach 1
30
31
32 <==Expected value Theoretical Approach 2
33
34
35 <==Sampling Approach Estimation
36
37
38 Work Area
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100

Final Prob4.) The manager of a project determined some time ago that the most critical task in the timely completion of a project is the use of a special instrument, a confusitron, that has an uncertain completion time (a random variable in terms of hours). He asks you, a confusitron expert, to use your experience to specify a discrete triangular probability distribution of outcomes--most like time to complete, pessimistic time to complete, and optimistic time to complete. Recently the project manager has learned that there is another equally critical task--framis-validation. This task occurs immediately after the confusitron. You are also a framis-validation expert. The project manager asks you for a similar discrete triangular distribution of outcomes (see below). He then asks you to create a random sample of 100 observations from this distribution: Confusitron Distribution of Hrs. Framis-Validation Distribution of Hrs. 1) Randomly sample 100 observations for both discrete triangular distributions of each task. Create a RV that is the sum of the tasks for each observation. Place the results in the designated area below. 2) Create a frequency distribution column graph of the 100 Sum observations below by determining the Sample Space for the RV; so, the bins for the column graph will be the unique sample space values of the graph. Make the first bin 0. (Hint: there should be 9 bin values, including 0) 3) What is the expected value of the Sum distribution? There are 2 theoretical ways to calculate it. Does it approximately match the average of your 100 observations (as it should)?

#8

Observations Meet 1-Points Meet 2-Points Meet 3-Points Manager
1 24 21 17 Abe
2 14 12 6 Abe
3 12 24 8 Abe
4 23 11 9 Abe
5 17 18 11 Abe
6 29 28 3 Abe
7 17 22 7 Abe
8 18 21 21 Abe
9 31 25 19 Lupe
10 25 23 9 Lupe
11 13 19 18 Lupe
12 32 40 11 Lupe
13 18 21 4 Lupe
14 21 16 7 Lupe
15 21 17 17 Lupe
16 14 18 11 Lupe
17 6 15 9 Gene
18 15 13 10 Gene
19 9 9 3 Gene
20 12 10 6 Gene
21 15 19 15 Gene
22 12 11 9 Gene
23 12 9 13 Gene
24 17 13 9 Gene
1
2

Final Prob8.) After a National Championship season (2013) the W&M Ultimate Mixed Martial Arts (UMMA) team trainers, Lupe—heavy weight division, Abe—welterweight division, and Gene—flyweight division, were celebrating at the Blue Talon Bistro in Williamsburg, VA. The conversation started as pleasant chatter, but in minutes a roaring argument was blazing! The headwaiter finally asked the trainers if they could be quiet or leave. Calm returned to the table and the headwaiter asked what seemed to be the problem. Gene said that the group was arguing if there was a significant difference of performance by the fighters in the 3 weight divisions. The headwaiter, a retired data analytics professor at W&M, said: “I have a laptop, and Excel and Minitab. Why don’t we do a test of hypothesis that at least one of the weight divisions is better than the others over the entire 3 meets?” Lupe had a thumb drive of the points scored by 24 fighters at 3 meets in 3 UMMA weight divisions. Use the data provided to perform the test of hypothesis and use a level of significance of 0.05. You may use Excel or Minitab to test the hypothesis. If you use Minitab copy the output to this sheet. 1) Write the Null and Alternative Hypotheses below. 2) Is there was a significant difference in performance (average points) by the fighters in the 3 weight divisions. (Give me the value of a measure that you use to either reject the null hypothesis or not to reject the null hypothesis.)

prob.hrs.

optimistic0.1535

most likely0.5560

pessimistic0.3100

prob.hrs.

optimistic0.1540

most likely0.4550

pessimistic0.40105

00.10.20.30.40.54050105Dist. of Framis-Validation

00.10.20.30.40.50.63560100Dist. of Confusitron Time