AA GENIUS WRITER

Running Head: CONFLICTING IDEAS 1

CONFLICTING IDEAS PAGE 6

Conflicting Ideas

Introduction

At Walt Disney, the stakeholders may at one point be faced with a compromise. At this point, the creditors and shareholders may be faced with a compromise because of conflicting interests. When it comes to handling the issues of an organization, it is always prudent to hold divided interests but at the end of the day, they must be able to accept the differences find an amicable solution to their differences. The stakeholder is the ones who control the way the business in the organizations. To make sure that the solution to the problems is solved, there is need Walt Disney to make sure that the main issue to be handled is done by the manager who will handle the issue using the empathic mob means by all areas of interested parties (Rio, 2007).In this case in Pont, it is important to make sure that the the interests of each of the stakeholders are well listened to because, in the end, the interest of two parties will have reached a common ground.

The issue among the stakeholders was about the way the company makes profits and how it offers a return on investment for the stakeholders. One group of the stakeholders wants the organization (creditors) to make a profit first before making a return on investment. On the other side, the other group of stakeholders (shareholders) wants the organization to give them profits regardless of whether they make profits or not.

In this context, therefore, the compromise is on the way the profits should be given back to the investors in the organization.

Background check of the stakeholders

The stakeholder’s point of interest for this case is that they initially invested their money at Walt Disney for the reason of getting profits. In the agreement, the result is for the stakeholders to get a return on investment. In this case now, the stakeholders having invested their cash in the company, the company did not make any profits and therefore, a compromises popped up. According to (McCourt, 1999), the contention of the stakeholders is that they are not able to make the expected profits, and therefore it is not easy to know how to give the return on investment. While this is happening, the stakeholders got divided. One group chose to have the company, make profits before asking for profits while another group of stakeholders wanted their share as agreed on investment (Polkinghorne, 1940).The two stands by the investors created a lot of compromise in the organization.

Reason for the lack of a resolution

The two stakeholders have not come to a conclusion is based on the fact that each of them feels they have the right message, and they are asking for the sake of their investment. In that case, therefore, there is need to make sure that the two stakeholders have their interest attended to. For the group that wants profits irrespective of whether profits have been made or not bases their argument on the fact that the management has been so reluctant, and they are not working hard to make sure profits are not achieved. They have the idea that, if the management is forced to commit by giving profits to the stakeholders, they are going to work hard. In that case, it is prudent for them to make sure that the management is put on toes so that they can make the right decision for the organization and allow the company to make profits.

On the other hand, some group of the stakeholders believes that the organization will be at a loss if they demand the profits if the organization has not been able to make profits. They believe that the management is not to blame for the loss and that they have to exercise patients for them to be able to make profits. In that case in point, they believe that for the business to go by the initial agreement, the organization has to understand and that in doing so, the target of the organization will have been achieved.

As explained above, therefore, the two stakeholders cannot find a solution because of their divided understanding of the issue (Heiner, 2010).When the interests of the two stakeholders are not achieved, especially that the organization has been making loses, then it will be hard for the two stakeholders to reach a compromise in their actions.

Common ground

For the two type of the stakeholders to have common ideas with the Walt Disney ideas, there is need to make sure that they both understand the needs of the company. There is a need for the two clients to make sure that they the company’s investors are well attended if they are not able to know that, it is excusable for both of them top demand for profits while they have not been able to make any products in the company. The company has not been able to meet their targets and thus the need for the first stakeholder to know that the only time the interest of the organization can be satisfied is by making sure that the Walt Disney can make profits firsts (Disney & Jackson, 2006).

Concerns of the Stakeholders

The stakeholders who hold the company at high regards wants to make sure that Walt Disney into their shows can make profits and products the right content for the viewers. The interest of the stakeholders is for all of them to achieve the best for the organization. Each of the stakeholders is interested if the fact that, the organization can make sure that Walt Disney gives the right content to the customers and that they can make sure this is right to make high-end achievements (Disney & Jackson, 2006).

The current solution lies with the organization being able to ensure that the Walt Disney achieves the right viewer’s hip. This is only the investors who are the greatest investors in the company can make sure that the success is achieved which benefits for both the stakeholders and the organization. When this is done, then the solutions lies with the stakeholders understanding the current situations.

The solutions that beg on the understanding that the two stakeholders being able to give Walt Disney the chance to make the adjustment to the detriment. Any investor who have the ability to know that the success of an organization lies with the stakeholders owning the challenges Walt Disney.

This is a compromise that is available with all the organization. The fact that the compromise has happened with this organization, it is also happening in many other organizations. This compromise is workable because the stakeholders can sit and find a solution to it.

References

Disney, W. & Jackson, K. (2006). Walt Disney. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.

Heiner, R. (2010). Conflicting interests. New York: Oxford University Press.

McCourt, T. (1999). Conflicting communication interests in America. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.

Polkinghorne, A. (1940). Walt Disney Story Books: Donald Duck and His Friends Jean Ayer Walt Disney Story Books: Little Pig's Picnic and Other Stories Margaret Wise Brown Walt Disney Story Books: Mickey Never Fails Robin Palmer Walt Disney Story Books: School Days in Disney Ville Caroline D. Emerson. The Elementary School Journal, 40(10), 794-795. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/457845.

Rio, V. (2007). Once upon a time: Walt Disney, the sources of inspiration for the Disney Studios. Choice Reviews Online, 45(03), 45-1251-45-1251. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/choice.45-1251.