Vargas Family Case Study part 2

1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%

2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00%

3 Satisfactory 79.00%

4 Good 87.00%

5 Excellent 100.00%

70.0 %Content

30.0 %Discussion of how to build an alliance with the Vargas family

The paper does not discuss how to build an alliance with the Vargas family and does not make any connections in regards to family therapy theories.

The paper vaguely discusses how to build an alliance with the Vargas family and makes few connections in regards to family therapy theories.

The paper fully discusses how to build an alliance with the Vargas family and makes clear connections in regards to family therapy theories.

The paper provides an advanced discussion on how to build an alliance with the Vargas family and makes sound connections in regards to family therapy theories.

The paper provides a comprehensive discussion on how to build an alliance with the Vargas family and makes insightful connections in regards to family therapy theories.

20.0 %Hypothesis about the family patterns maintaining the problem for the Vargas family

The paper does not provide any hypothesis about the family patterns maintaining the problem for the Vargas family and does not make any connections in regards to family patterns.

The paper vaguely develops a hypothesis about the family patterns maintaining the problem for the Vargas family and makes few connections in regards to family patterns.

The paper fully develops a hypothesis about the family patterns maintaining the problem for the Vargas family and makes clear connections in regards to family patterns.

The paper provides an advanced hypothesis about the family patterns maintaining the problem for the Vargas family and makes sound connections in regards to family patterns.

The paper provides a comprehensive hypothesis about the family patterns maintaining the problem for the Vargas family and makes insightful connections in regards to family patterns.

20.0 %Outline the expectations for each phase of treatment for the Vargas family

The paper does not outline the expectations for each phase of treatment for the Vargas family and does not make any connections in regards to each phase of treatment.

The paper vaguely outlines the expectations for each phase of treatment for the Vargas family and makes few connections in regards each phase of treatment.

The paper fully outlines the expectations for each phase of treatment for the Vargas family and makes clear connections in regards to each phase of treatment.

The paper provides an advanced outline of the expectations for each phase of treatment for the Vargas family and makes sound connections in regards to each phase of treatment.

The paper provides a comprehensive outline of the expectations for each phase of treatment for the Vargas family and makes insightful connections in regards to each phase of treatment.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)

No reference page is included. No citations are used.

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage