MT450 DB6
Product Decisions
Chapter Seven
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-2
Key Learning Points
Elements of brand equity, developing strong brands, and brand extensions Developing and using perceptual maps to make positioning and repositioning decisions Global and technology-related issues in positioning and branding Product line management Issues in packaging and product design
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-3
Overview
Product strategy: Value proposition. Product positioning
Other issues: Product features Product line Packaging Product design
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-4
Branding
Why do consumers value brands? Branded products are perceived as superior to generic equivalents. Changing the brand name is often a key strategy for troubled brands.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-5
Table 7.1 Consumer Ratings of Analgesic Brands
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-6
Branding
Types of Brands
Corporate Brands Corporate Parent Brands
Distinct Product Brands Sub-brands Co-brands Ingredient brands
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-7
Illustration
What type of brands are these?
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-8
- David A. Aaker
“Brand equity is a set of assets (and liabilities) linked to a brand’s name and symbol that adds to (or subtracts from) the value provided by a product or service to a firm or that firm’s customers.”
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-9
Figure 7.1 Brand Equity
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-10
Branding
Brand names are product characteristics. Brand names can create tremendous value for firms. Awareness is not the same as equity.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-11
Discussion Questions
1. What factors influence consumers’ perceptions of brand names?
2. What associations do these brand names engender?
3. If associations are negative, can the brands above be “fixed”? If so, what would you do?
Think about how perceptions of McDonald’s (or the brand of your choice), have changed over time.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-12
Branding
Building strong brands: Create a brand identity. Be consistent over time. Track the equity. Assign responsibility for brand development activities. Invest in the brands.
Managing brands is increasingly difficult.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-13
Branding
The success of brand extensions is difficult to predict. See the brand extension examples. “Fit” is important in determining brand extension success.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-14
Branding
Extension “Fit” Considerations
Transferability of associations Complementarity of the product Similarity of the users Transferability of the symbol
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-15
- Russell S. Winer
“The term global marketing is used in two ways: as a generic term encompassing any marketing activities outside a company’s home market and to refer to a standardization of the marketing strategies used to market a product around the world.”
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-16
Branding Factors Favoring Global Marketing
Consumer convergence Demographic convergence Decline of the nuclear family The changing role of women Static populations Higher living standards Cultural convergence
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-17
Branding
Objections to global marketing: Reflects product orientation Advantage of selling global brands has declined in emerging markets Some brands cannot be used everywhere Local brands can be powerful competitors
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-18
Branding
Global marketing managers should understand segments based on attitudes towards global brands:
Global Citizens (55%) Global Dreamers (23%) Antiglobals (13%) Global Agnostics (9%)
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-19
Procter and Gamble’s Definition of a Global Brand
“To obtain clear and consistent brand equity across geographic markets, a brand should be positioned the same, have the same formulation, provide the same benefits, and have a consistent advertising message.”
- Russell S. Winer
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-20
Table 7.2 Best Global Brands
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-21
Branding
Branding for high-tech products: Important for high-tech products in mature phase of life-cycle Often difficult to accomplish Campaigns should deemphasize features and focus more on benefits Component manufacturers may also benefit from branding
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-22
The “Intel Inside” branding campaign has been incredibly successful, resulting in a 95% share of the chip market and $33 billion in sales in 2009.
Figure 7.2 Intel’s Co-Branding Campaign
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-23
Branding
Brand personality dimensions include:
Sincerity. Excitement. Competence. Sophistication. Ruggedness.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-24
Activity
Identify a brand that personifies each of the brand dimensions listed below:
Sincerity Ruggedness Excitement Competence Sophistication
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-25
Branding
Brand person relationships: Some people find comfort and satisfaction in their relationships with those brands to which they are loyal. Ethnographic research and depth interviews provide data. Strong brand feelings manifest in unusual ways. Passionate brand fans may be useful.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-26
Branding
Retail branding: National brands Regional brands Value brands Private labels Generics
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-27
Branding Benefits of Private Labels
Private Labels appeal to price-sensitive consumers. Retailers earn higher profit margins. Retailers can use strong private labels to differentiate themselves from the competition. Labels can be used to secure better terms from national brand manufacturers.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-28
Figure 7.4 New and Old Pepsi Logos
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-29
Branding
Marketing ROI and branding Two approaches are used for measuring brand equity:
Behavioral measures Intermediate measures
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-30
Product Positioning
Positioning is both a noun and a verb:
Positioning Position
Four steps are involved in making positioning decisions.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-31
Figure 7.5 Credit Card Joint Space: Attribute Based
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-32
Figure 7.6 Credit Card Joint Space:
Multidimensional Scaling Version
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-33
Positioning
Making positioning decisions: Perceptual maps determine if the value proposition is well-implemented. Maps are useful only for brands that appeal to the same target group. Trade-offs must be considered when repositioning.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-34
Positioning
Considerations in repositioning Repositioning is common.
Tired brands New segments Environmentally conscious
Multiple positions Positioning decisions may be linked to PLC.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-35
Product Decisions
Product features Types of features considered Creating product configurations
Product line decisions Product variants are developed for different reasons. Brand names may be shared. Complementary items
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-36
Product Decisions
Number of products in a line and product differentiation
Variants may be added to a line as long as the incremental sales exceed the incremental costs. Eliminating brands is sometimes preferable.
Product line resource allocation Degree of product variation often dictates resource allocation strategy.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-37
Figure 7.7 Growth Share Matrix
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-38
Product Decisions
Resource allocation using the BCG matrix:
Dogs Problem children Stars Cash cows
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-39
Table 7.3 Example of a Product Portfolio: Large
Southern U.S. Bank (1986)
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-40
Product Decisions
Mass customization Mass customization is made possible by information technology improvements. Majority of mass customization efforts have occurred in manufacturing. Customers have become product makers through interactive choiceboards.
Ex: NikeID.nike.com; MyMMs.com
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-41
Product Decisions
Approaches to mass customization: Collaborative customizers Adaptive customizers Cosmetic customizers Transparent customizers
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-42
Product Decisions
Packaging and product design:
Packaging decisions have both functional and strategic implications.
Functional aspects Strategic aspects
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-43
Product Decisions
Packaging and product design:
Product design can differentiate a brand from the competition.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-44
Executive Summary Composition of brand equity. Brand extension success is a function of four factors. Global brands can be useful. High-tech products benefit from branding. Implementing positioning involves four steps. Product features should suit the target market. Product lines need to be carefully managed. Packaging and product design differentiate a brand.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-45
•All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America.
- Product Decisions
- Key Learning Points
- Overview
- Branding
- Table 7.1�Consumer Ratings of Analgesic Brands
- Slide Number 6
- Illustration
- Slide Number 8
- Figure 7.1�Brand Equity
- Branding
- Discussion Questions
- Branding
- Branding
- Slide Number 14
- Slide Number 15
- Slide Number 16
- Branding
- Branding
- Slide Number 19
- Table 7.2�Best Global Brands
- Branding
- Slide Number 22
- Branding
- Activity
- Branding
- Branding
- Slide Number 27
- Figure 7.4�New and Old Pepsi Logos
- Branding
- Product Positioning
- Figure 7.5�Credit Card Joint Space: Attribute Based
- Figure 7.6�Credit Card Joint Space: Multidimensional Scaling Version
- Positioning
- Positioning
- Product Decisions
- Product Decisions
- Figure 7.7�Growth Share Matrix
- Product Decisions
- Table 7.3�Example of a Product Portfolio: Large Southern U.S. Bank (1986)
- Product Decisions
- Product Decisions
- Product Decisions
- Product Decisions
- Executive Summary
- Slide Number 45