Operations Management Homework
dplpfinsek
rubric.docx
QSO 600 Case Study Analysis Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
The ability to effectively and efficiently conduct analyses of strategic project management issues and provide professional, written analyses and recommendations are critical skills for operations management. In this course, there are five real-world case study assignments to develop and demonstrate this competence.
Requirements of Submission: Case study assignments must follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, title page, and discipline-appropriate citations (APA 6th Edition). Page length requirements: 2–3 pages maximum (not including title page).
Instructor Feedback: Students can find their feedback in the Grade Center.
|
Critical Elements |
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Needs Improvement |
Not Evident |
Value |
|
Case-Specific Analyses |
Meets proficient criteria and uses clear and relevant examples to substantiate ideas (23-25) |
Analyzes the case study and uses specific details to explain the analysis (20-22) |
Includes responses to the case study but response contains inaccurate parts or lacks details (18-19) |
Does not analyze the case
(0-17) |
25 |
|
Application of Operations Management Concepts |
Meets proficient criteria and uses clear and relevant examples to substantiate ideas
(23-25) |
Applies operations management concepts to the case analysis using specific details
(20-22) |
Applies operations management concepts to the case analysis but response contains inaccurate parts or lacks details (18-19) |
Does not apply operations management concepts
(0-17) |
25 |
|
Application of Methods, Tools, and Techniques for Process Management |
Meets proficient criteria and uses clear and varied evidence to substantiate conclusions
(23-25) |
Demonstrates application of appropriate methods, quantitative tools, and techniques to develop informed, logical conclusions
(20-22) |
Demonstrates application of methods, quantitative tools, and techniques to develop conclusions; however, methods are applied inaccurately or do not make connections to conclusions (18-19) |
Does not demonstrate application of methods, quantitative tools, and techniques to develop conclusions
(0-17) |
25 |
|
Articulation of Response |
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy to read format (23-25) |
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
(20-22) |
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (18-19) |
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
(0-17) |
25 |
|
Earned Total Comments: |
100% |
