case study
WILMINGTON UNIVERSITY
Course: IST7100 Case Study Analysis
Student:___________________ Weighted Content:______ CT:______ Comm:______ Weighted Rubric Score:__________
Actual Score ______ ______ ______
_
|
Performance |
Unsatisfactory 1 |
Developing 2 |
Competent 3 |
Accomplished 4 |
Exemplary 5 |
|
Knowledge of Content
50% of rubric score
Critical Thinking 30% of rubric score
Communications Written 20% of rubric score
|
Work does not reflect the assignment purpose |
Work marginally reflects the assignment purpose |
Work reflects the assignment purpose |
Work is accurately detailed, and in line with course content |
Work stands-out as exemplary, is accurately detailed, and in line with course content
|
|
|
Skill in gathering, storing, & retrieving, data is inferior
|
Skill in gathering, storing, & retrieving, data is elementary, requires significant assistance |
Skill in gathering, storing, & retrieving, data is acceptable, requires average assistance |
Skill in gathering, storing, & retrieving, data is accomplished, requires little to no assistance |
Skill in gathering, storing, & retrieving, data is highly evolved
|
|
|
Research sources do not relate to the case study |
Research sources are generalized, with minimal relationship to the case study |
Research sources are generalized but most are related to the case study |
The majority of the resources are related to the case study |
Research sources were well selected and relate directly to the case study
|
|
|
Depth of research is below minimal expectations |
Professional references (Books and peer review sources) are minimal other reference sources are dominant |
Shared use of professional references and other sources… |
Shared use of professional references and other quality sources… Acceptably integrated into the document |
Shared use of professional references and other quality sources…Integrates them clearly and concisely into the document (Statements w/multiple support)
|
|
|
Ineffective documentation of research/support …less than minimum required professional references used |
Uses at least minimum required professional ref to support research with poor integration |
Uses at least minimum required prof ref to support research with adequate integration |
Uses ample references and integrates them acceptably into the document |
Uses ample references and integrates them clearly and concisely into the document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsatisfactory |
Developing |
Competent |
Accomplished |
Exemplary |
|
|
Ability to incorporate graphical data/info is lacking |
Ability to incorporate graphical data/info is emerging |
Ability to incorporate graphical data/info is basic |
Ability to incorporate graphical data/info & link key relationships is proficient |
Ability to incorporate graphical data/info & link key relationships is superior
|
|
|
Does not demonstrates an understanding of the research to the case study |
Connects relationships between the research and case study at a minimum level |
Identifies relative relationships between the research and the case study |
Identifies relative relationships between the research and the case study and is able to compare and contrast topics |
Identifies relative relationships between the research and the case study and is able to accurately and effectively compare and contrast topics |
|
|
Fails to document critical points |
Basic critical points identified |
Critical point between the research and the case study are identified |
Critical point between the research and the case study are identified and analyzed |
Critical point between the research and the case study are effectively identified and critically analyzed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sentences are not well-constructed and often lack clarity. Formats and patterns are repetitive |
Sentences are somewhat clear and well constructed, but lack variety in format& length |
Most sentences are clear and well-constructed some evidence of variety in format, length, and complexity. |
Sentences are clear and well-constructed - Some evidence of variety in format, length, and complexity |
Varied well-constructed sentences are evident throughout the document with an appropriate stylistic flair
|
|
|
Paper is riddled with spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors
|
Paper contains 5 or 6 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors |
Paper contains 3 or 4 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors |
Paper contains 1 or 2 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors |
No spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors are readily apparent
|
|
|
Paper is riddled with APA errors
|
Paper contains 5 or 6 APA errors |
Paper contains 3 or 4 APA errors |
Paper contains 1 or 2 APA errors |
No APA errors are readily apparent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|