For Quality work for all only !!!

company_chosen_is_samsung_electronics.docx

Home >Information Systems homework help >For Quality work for all only !!!

Company chosen is Samsung Electronics

Portfolio Project Assignment Choice #1: Research an Organization

Choose a publicly held corporation from an industry with which you are familiar. Conduct research on the organization using the internet, and other credible sources. Your analysis of that organization needs to include the following:

1 Analyze how people, information, and information technology help the company remain competitive in their industry.

2 Analyze Porter’s Five Forces Model in relation to competition within the industry of that corporation.

3 Evaluate how supply chain management systems, enterprise resource planning systems, and customer relationship management systems are currently used, or could be used, within the organization.

4 Evaluate how a database management system and a data warehouse are currently used, or could be used, within the organization.

5 Analyze how the five agent‐based technologies are currently used, or could be used, within the organization.

6 Evaluate which of the nine major e‐commerce business models are currently used, or could be used, within the organization, and synthesize how these could work together to create value within the organization.

7 Analyze how the organization could benefit from using the systems development life cycle (SDLC), and what type of projects within the organization could benefit from this process.

8 Evaluate the phases of business continuity planning as they relate to the organization.

9 Analyze how the organization could use emerging trends such as Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, cell phones, and RFID to remain competitive in the future.

10 Evaluate measures that the organization takes, or could take, to ensure information is protected and free from security vulnerabilities.

Your paper should be 7 to 10 pages in length and encompass your knowledge from all modules of the course. Support your argument with at least five credible, outside sources. Remember to use proper citations and references, and adhere to APA Requirements. The Library is a good place to find this information. You may wish to refer to the Portfolio Project Rubric to see the evaluation criteria for this project.

Additional instructions

One reminder about portfolio.

I believe you have completed most of work. It is important that you organize the paper in sections as indicated in portfolio sheet. It makes it easier for the reader and for you to see what you have covered and what needs to be covered.

MIS300: Portfolio Project Rubric

Criteria	Meets Expectation	Approaches Expectation	Below Expectation	Limited Evidence
	Content, Research, and Analysis
	17-20 Points	13-16 Points	9-12 Points	5-8 Points
Preliminary Deliverables	Submitted an industry or organization for instructor approval in Week 1 as assigned.	Submitted an industry or organization for instructor approval in Week 2.	Submitted an industry or organization for instructor approval in Week 3.	Did not submit an industry or organization for instructor approval.
	17-20 Points	13-16 Points	9-12 Points	5-8 Points
Content	Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of topics when responding to all 10 questions; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.	Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.	Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.	Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
	17-20 Points	13-16 Points	9-12 Points	5-8 Points
Requirements	The Portfolio includes well thought out answers to all 10 questions, which include specific details and valid considerations for each.	The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.	The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.	The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
	17-20 Points	13-16 Points	9-12 Points	5-8 Points
Analysis: Competitive Advantage	Provides a strong analysis of how people, information, and information technology help the company remain competitive.	Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis of how people, information, and information technology help the company remain competitive.	Major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis of how people, information, and information technology help the company remain competitive.	Fails to demonstrate thought, insight and analysis of how people, information, and information technology help the company remain competitive.
	17-20 Points	13-16 Points	9-12 Points	5-8 Points
Analysis: Porter's Five Forces Model	Provides a strong analysis of Porter's Five Forces Model directly related to competition within the industry of that corporation.	Small number of significant but not major flaws or omissions in analysis.	Includes major flaws or omissions, or numerous minor flaws in analysis.	Fails to provide suitable analysis.
	17-20 Points	13-16 Points	9-12 Points	5-8 Points
Analysis: Systems Planning	Provides a thorough analysis of how supply chain management systems, enterprise resource planning systems, and customer relationship management systems are currently used or could be used.	Small number of significant but not major flaws or omissions in analysis.	Includes major flaws or omissions, or numerous minor flaws in analysis.	Does not provide an adequate analysis.

MIS300: Portfolio Project Rubric

	17-20 Points	13-16 Points	9-12 Points	5-8 Points
Analysis: Data Management	Provides a thorough analysis of how a database management system and a data warehouse are currently used, or could be used, within the organizations.	Small number of significant but not major flaws or omissions in analysis.	Includes major flaws or omissions, or numerous minor flaws or omissions in analysis.	Does not provide an adequate analysis.
	17-20 Points	13-16 Points	9-12 Points	5-8 Points
Analysis: Five Agent- Based Technologies	Provides a strong analysis of how the five-agent- based technologies are currently used, or could be used within the organization.	Small number of significant but not major flaws or omissions in analysis.	Includes major flaws or omissions, or numerous minor flaws or omissions in analysis.	Does not provide an adequate analysis.
	17-20 Points	13-16 Points	9-12 Points	5-8 Points
Analysis: E-Commerce	Provides a thorough analysis of which of the nine major e-commerce business models are currently used, or could be used within the organization, and synthesize how these could work together to create value within this organization.	Small number of significant but not major flaws or omissions in analysis.	Includes major flaws or omissions, or numerous minor flaws or omissions in analysis.	Does not provide an adequate analysis.
	17-20 Points	13-16 Points	9-12 Points	5-8 Points
Analysis: Systems Development Life Cycle	Provides a strong analysis of how the organization could benefit from using the systems development life cycle (SDLC), and what type of projects within the organization could benefit from this process.	Small number of significant but not major flaws or omissions in analysis.	Includes major flaws or omissions, or numerous minor flaws or omissions in analysis.	Does not provide an adequate analysis.
	17-20 Points	13-16 Points	9-12 Points	5-8 Points
Analysis: Phases of Business Continuity	Provides a thorough analysis of the phases of business continuity planning directly related to the organization.	Small number of significant but not major flaws or omissions in analysis.	Includes major flaws or omissions, or numerous minor flaws or omissions in analysis.	Does not provide an adequate analysis.
	17-20 Points	13-16 Points	9-12 Points	5-8 Points
Analysis: Emerging Trends	Provides a strong analysis of how the organization could use emerging trends such as Bluetooth, WiFi, cell phones, and RFID to remain competitive in the future.	Small number of significant but not major flaws or omissions in analysis.	Includes major flaws or omissions, or numerous minor flaws or omissions in analysis.	Does not provide an adequate analysis.

MIS300: Portfolio Project Rubric

	17-20 Points	13-16 Points	9-12 Points	5-8 Points
Analysis: Data Security	Provides a thorough analysis of the measures the organization takes, or could take, to ensure information is protected and free from security vulnerabilities.	Small number of significant but not major flaws or omissions in analysis.	Includes major flaws or omissions, or numerous minor flaws or omissions in analysis.	Does not provide an adequate analysis.
	13-15 Points	10-12 Points	7-9 Points	4-6 Points
Sources	Cites and integrates at least 5 credible sources.	Cites and integrates 4 credible sources.	Cites and integrates 3 credible sources.	Cites and integrates no credible sources.
	13-15 Points	10-12 Points	7-9 Points	4-6 Points
Application of Source Material	Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.	Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.	Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.	Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.
	Mechanics and Writing
	17-20 Points	13-16 Points	9-12 Points	5-8 Points
Organization	Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.	Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper essay format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.	Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper essay format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.	Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements.
	17-20 Points	13-16 Points	9-12 Points	5-8 Points
Grammar and Style	Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.	Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.	Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.	Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.
	17-20 Points	13-16 Points	9-12 Points	5-8 Points
Demonstrates proper use of APA style	Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than one significant error.	Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than two to three significant errors.	Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU- Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with four to five significant errors.	Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU- Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with more than five significant errors.

Total points possible = 350