phyllis young

6/8/2016 https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/CIS/429/1128/Week8­1128/Week 8 Case Study 2 Grading Rubric.html

https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/CIS/429/1128/Week8­1128/Week%208%20Case%20Study%202%20Grading%20Rubric.html 1/2

Points: 80 Case Study 2: Data Warehousing and the Web

Criteria   Unacceptable Below 60% F

Meets Minimum

Expectations 60­69% D

  Fair

70­79% C

  Proficient 80­89% B

  Exemplary 90­100% A

1. Analyze and support why the ETL system is considered to be the most resource­ consuming system in a data warehouse framework. Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed and supported why the ETL system is considered to be the most resource­ consuming system in a data warehouse framework.

Insufficiently analyzed and supported why the ETL system is considered to be the most resource­ consuming system in a data warehouse framework.

Partially analyzed and supported why the ETL system is considered to be the most resource­ consuming system in a data warehouse framework.

Satisfactorily analyzed and supported why the ETL system is considered to be the most resource­ consuming system in a data warehouse framework.

Thoroughly analyzed and supported why the ETL system is considered to be the most resource­ consuming system in a data warehouse framework.

2. Take a position on the author’s opinion of semi­ structured DMM over structured DMM. Support your position with evidence. Weight: 30%

Did not submit or incompletely took a position on the author’s opinion of semi­structured DMM over structured DMM. Did not submit or incompletely supported your position with evidence.

Insufficiently took a position on the author’s opinion of semi­ structured DMM over structured DMM. Insufficiently supported your position with evidence.

Partially took a position on the author’s opinion of semi­ structured DMM over structured DMM. Partially supported your position with evidence.

Satisfactorily took a position on the author’s opinion of semi­structured DMM over structured DMM. Satisfactorily supported your position with evidence.

Thoroughly took a position on the author’s opinion of semi­structured DMM over structured DMM. Thoroughly supported your position with evidence.

3. Take a position on the validity of the author’s implication of using semi­ structured DMM for real­time updates. Support your position with evidence. Weight: 30%

Did not submit or incompletely took a position on the validity of the author’s implication of using semi­ structured DMM for real­time updates. Did not submit or incompletely supported your position with evidence.

Insufficiently took a position on the validity of the author’s implication of using semi­ structured DMM for real­time updates. Insufficiently supported your position with evidence.

Partially took a position on the validity of the author’s implication of using semi­ structured DMM for real­ time updates. Partially supported your position with evidence.

Satisfactorily took a position on the validity of the author’s implication of using semi­ structured DMM for real­ time updates. Satisfactorily supported your position with evidence.

Thoroughly took a position on the validity of the author’s implication of using semi­ structured DMM for real­ time updates. Thoroughly supported your position with evidence.

4. 3 references Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

More than 8 errors present

7­8 errors present

5­6 errors present

3­4 errors present

0­2 errors present

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

6/8/2016 https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/CIS/429/1128/Week8­1128/Week 8 Case Study 2 Grading Rubric.html

https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/CIS/429/1128/Week8­1128/Week%208%20Case%20Study%202%20Grading%20Rubric.html 2/2

Weight: 10%