evaluation argument paper.
fadoo
rupric0.docEvaluation Argument
A B C D
|
|
Very strong |
Strong |
Average |
Somewhat Weak |
Weak |
Introduction: has a hook and is engaging? Sets up context? Evaluation is of something specific, not a broad issue or category? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target audience awareness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clear and direct qualitative thesis statement near the beginning? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clear and focused criteria near the beginning? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structure/organization, focus/clarity: stays on topic and follows criteria? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Support/explanation: avoids summary? Depth and specific examples and details? Logical? Quotations sandwiched appropriately and cited properly using MLA format? Individual thinking is evident? Doesn’t rely on sources too much? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voice/tone: distinctive? Engaging? Consistent? Appropriate for audience? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterarguments: considers other viewpoints and handles them appropriately? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusion: engaging? Wraps things up clearly? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mechanics (grammar, punctuation, sentence structure, etc.) are sound? Works cited pages is done correctly? |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Grade:
