PROF XAVIER
PSYC 221
Book Report Grading Rubric
Student: _______________________________
|
|
20 |
17.8 |
15.8 |
13.8 |
11.8 |
0 |
|
Structure and Organization |
Clear introduction and strong subject evidence; clear and appropriate transitions; appropriate paragraphing; logical, strong conclusion rising from content. |
Generally clear introduction and focused; generally clear and appropriate transitions; mostly appropriate paragraphing; adequate conclusion – relates to content but lacks objectivity or is vague. |
Adequate introduction; unclear; adequate transitions; reader can follow what is being said, but the paper’s overall organization is choppy; adequate paragraphs; conclusion is simplistic. |
Weak introduction; weak transitions; main points can be ascertained, but difficult to follow what is being said; weak and long paragraphing; conclusion repeats introduction . |
Weak introduction and does not draw reader’s interest; little or no transitions; organization is disjointed and haphazard; paragraphs are weak; lacks conclusion. |
No assignment was turned in. |
|
Content |
Assignment parameters (length 6–7 pages, subject, objectives) are observed; focus is clear and coherent (good sense of audience); obvious understanding of subject; orderly development; conclusion/reflection are clearly supported and/or illustrated |
Assignment parameters (length 4–5 pages, subject, objectives) are observed; focus is generally clear and coherent (general sense of audience); good understanding of subject; adequate development; orderly, but stiff, choppy progression of evidence |
Assignment parameters (length 2–3 pages, subject, objectives) not clearly observed; mostly focused (some sense of audience); thoughts randomly organized and presented; conclusions/reflection weakly supported and/or illustrated |
Inadequate or minimal observance of assignment length, subject and objectives; weakly focused (little sense of audience); unclear progression of ideas; conclusions/reflection weakly supported and/or illustrated |
Inadequate length; objectives of assignment not met; unfocused; little or no sense of audience; serious and persistent errors in organization and structure; lacks understanding of subject; disorganized; does not prove point, if one can be discerned |
No assignment was turned in. |
|
Grammar and Mechanics |
Sentence fluency coherent, unified, varied; sentence structure complete; correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization; varied diction, word choices |
Sentence fluency correct, varied; Minor errors in structure (fragments, run-ons); correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization; limited diction, word choices |
Relatively few errors in sentence fluency; multiple fragments/run-ons, poor spelling, punctuation, and capitalization; limited diction, uses trite words, slang, and contractions |
Significant errors in sentence fluency and structure, spelling, punctuation and capitalization; diction weak or inappropriate |
Serious and persistent errors in: sentence fluency, sentence structure, spelling, punctuation, usage, and word choice |
No assignment was turned in. |
|
|
20 |
17.8 |
15.8 |
13.8 |
11.8 |
0 |
|
Book Report |
Book was on child development and/or issues facing children. The book was between 250–300 pages. |
Book was on child development and/or issues facing children. The book was between 200–250 pages |
Book was not completely on child development and/or issues were irrelevant. The book was less than 200 pages. |
Book was not on child development and/or issues were irrelevant. The book was less than 150 pages. |
Book was not on child development and/or issues were not issues facing children. The book was less than 100 pages. |
No assignment was turned in. |
|
Format |
Appearance is readable and neat; correct use of APA, margins, font size/ style, pagination (3–4 pages), reference page correctly formatted, double-spaced, alphabetized; sources correctly cited |
Appearance is readable and neat; most of paper uses correct APA, font size/style, pagination; reference page format generally consistent and alphabetized; sources correctly cited |
Readability and neatness of paper are compromised by the number of errors; APA/ format is inconsistent and inadequate; reference page is inconsistent and not alphabetized; most sources correctly cited |
Disorderliness of paper makes it difficult to read; several format errors; significant errors in reference page; references are not alphabetized; errors in citations |
Paper is not readable and is disorderly; APA format is not used; no reference page and/or numerous format errors; sources not cited or incorrectly cited |
No assignment was turned in. |
|
Instructor’s Comments: |
Points given: /100 |