chapter19theliabilityrisk.ppt

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Chapter 19

The Liability Risk

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Agenda

  • Basis of Legal Liability
  • Law of Negligence
  • Imputed Negligence
  • Res Ipsa Loquitur
  • Specific Applications of the Law of Negligence
  • Current Tort Liability Problems

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Basis of Legal Liability

  • A legal wrong is a violation of a person’s legal rights, or a failure to perform a legal duty owed to a certain person or to society as a whole
  • Legal wrongs include:
  • Crime
  • Breach of contract
  • Tort

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Basis of Legal Liability (Continued)

  • A tort is a legal wrong for which the court allows a remedy in the form of money damages
  • The person who is injured (plaintiff) by the action of another (tortfeasor) can sue for damages
  • Torts fall into three categories:
  • Intentional, e.g., fraud, assault
  • Strict liability means that liability is imposed regardless of negligence or fault
  • Negligence

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Law of Negligence

  • Negligence is the failure to exercise the standard of care required by law to protect others from an unreasonable risk of harm
  • The standard of care is not the same for each wrongful act. It is based on the care required of a reasonably prudent person

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Law of Negligence (Continued)

  • Elements of Negligence
  • Existence of a legal duty to use reasonable care
  • Failure to perform that duty
  • Damage or injury to the claimant
  • A proximate cause relationship between the negligent act and the infliction of damages, which requires an unbroken chain of events

*

Transparency Master 1.2

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Law of Negligence (Continued)

  • Compensatory damages compensate the victim for losses actually incurred
  • Special damages provide compensation for medical expenses
  • General damages provide compensation for pain and suffering
  • Punitive damages are designed to punish people and organizations so that others are deterred from committing the same wrongful act

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Exhibit 19.1 Types of Damages

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Law of Negligence (Continued)

  • The ability to collect damages for negligence depends on state law
  • Under a contributory negligence law, the injured person cannot collect damages if his or her care falls below the standard of care required for his or her protection
  • Under strict application of common law, the injured cannot collect damages if his or her conduct contributed in any way to the injury

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Law of Negligence (Continued)

  • Under a comparative negligence law, the financial burden of the injury is shared by both parties according to their respective degrees of fault
  • Under the pure rule, you can collect damages even if you are negligent, but your reward is reduced in proportion to your fault
  • Under the 50 percent rule, you cannot recover if you are 50 percent or more at fault
  • Under the 51 percent rule, you cannot recover if you are 51 percent or more at fault

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Law of Negligence (Continued)

  • Some legal defenses can defeat a claim for damages:
  • The last clear chance rule states that a plaintiff who is endangered by his or her own negligence can still recover damages from the defendant if the defendant has a last clear chance to avoid the accident but fails to do so
  • Under the assumption of risk doctrine, a person who understands and recognizes the danger inherent in a particular activity cannot recover damages in the event of an injury

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Imputed Negligence

  • Under certain conditions, the negligence of one person can be attributed to another
  • Under a vicarious liability law, a motorist’s negligence is imputed to the vehicle’s owner
  • Under the family purpose doctrine, the owner of an auto can be held liable for negligent acts committed by family members
  • Negligence may arise out of a joint business venture
  • Under a dram shop law, a business that sells liquor can be held liable for damages that may result from the sale of liquor

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Res Ipsa Loquitur – “the thing speaks for itself”

  • Under this doctrine, the very fact that the injury or damage occurs establishes a presumption of negligence
  • Three requirements must be met for res ipsa loquitur to apply:
  • The event is one that normally does not occur in the absence of negligence
  • The defendant has exclusive control over the instrumentality causing the accident
  • The injured party has not contributed to the accident in any way

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Specific Applications of the Law of Negligence

  • The standard of care owed to others depends upon the situation
  • A trespasser is a person who enters or remains on the owner’s property without the owner’s consent
  • The duty to refrain from injuring a trespasser is sometimes referred to as the duty of slight care

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Specific Applications of the Law of Negligence (Continued)

  • A licensee is a person who enters the premises with the occupant’s expressed or implied permission
  • The property owner must warn the licensee of unsafe conditions which are apparent
  • An invitee is a person who is invited onto the premises for the benefit of the occupant
  • The occupant has an obligation to inspect the premises and eliminate any dangerous conditions

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Specific Applications of the Law of Negligence (Continued)

  • An attractive nuisance is a hazardous condition that can attract and injure children
  • The occupants of land are liable for the injuries of children who may be attracted by some dangerous condition, feature, or article
  • For Example, a building contractor leaves the keys in a tractor, and a child is injured while driving it

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Specific Applications of the Law of Negligence (Continued)

  • Owners and operators of automobiles who drive in a careless manner can be held liable for property damage or bodily injury sustained by another person
  • An owner who is not the operator can be held liable for the acts of operators if an agency relationship exists
  • Charitable institutions are no longer immune from lawsuits, especially with respect to commercial activities

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Specific Applications of the Law of Negligence (Continued)

  • Governmental entities can be sued in almost every aspect of governmental activity
  • The doctrine of sovereign immunity has been modified over time
  • A governmental unit can be held liable if it is negligent in the performance of a proprietary function, e.g., the operation of water plants
  • Immunity from lawsuits for governmental functions, such as the planning of a sewer system, has eroded over time

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Specific Applications of the Law of Negligence (Continued)

  • Under the doctrine of respondeat superior, an employer can be held liable for the negligent acts of employees while they are acting on the employer’s behalf
  • The worker must be an employee
  • The employee must be acting within the scope of employment when the negligent act occurred
  • Parents can be held liable for the actions of a child if:
  • The child uses a dangerous weapon to injure someone
  • The child is acting as an agent for the parents
  • A minor child is operating a family car

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Specific Applications of the Law of Negligence (Continued)

  • Most states have laws that hold parents liable for willful and malicious acts of children that result in property damage to others
  • Owners of wild animals are held strictly liable for injuries to others
  • Strict liability may also be imposed on the owners of ordinary pets, such as dogs

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Current Tort Liability Problems

  • Critics claim the present tort system has numerous defects that reduce its effectiveness in compensating injured victims, including:
  • Rising tort liability costs
  • Inefficiency in compensating injured victims
  • Uncertainty of legal outcomes
  • High jury awards
  • Long delays in settling lawsuits

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Rising Tort Liability Costs

  • Several factors help explain the substantial increase in tort costs over time, including:
  • Juries and judges desensitized to the value of the dollar when damages are awarded
  • Aggressive and creative litigation strategies
  • Rising medical costs
  • Abuses in class action lawsuits
  • States striking down portions of tort reform
  • An increase in lawsuits against company officials
  • Deep pocket syndrome
  • Exploitation of high-verdict cases by the media

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Exhibit 19.2 Tort Costs Relative to GDP ($billions)

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Exhibit 19.3 Median1 and Average Personal Injury Jury Awards, 2000 and 2009 (000 omitted)

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Tort Reform in the States

  • State tort reforms include:
  • Capping noneconomic damages, such as pain and suffering
  • Reinstating the state-of-the-art defense for product liability cases
  • Restricting punitive damages awards
  • Modifying the collateral source rule
  • Modifying the joint and several liability rule
  • Alternative dispute resolution (ADR), a technique for resolving a legal dispute using arbitration or mediation

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Medical Sector Claims

  • Medical malpractice occurs when a negligent act or omission by a physician or other healthcare professional results in injury or harm to the patient
  • The injured patient must show that the doctor deviated from the generally accepted standards of practice in this particular case.
  • Many malpractice suits are due to medical errors by healthcare providers, especially errors in hospitals that result in the death of patients

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Medical Sector Claims (Continued)

  • Other reasons patients sue physicians include:
  • The intimate relationship between patients and physicians that existed in the past has been lost
  • People are more litigious than in the past
  • Physicians and other medical experts will now testify against physicians in malpractice cases
  • The media has made more people aware of the vulnerability of physicians to malpractice suits
  • Physicians accuse attorneys of filing malpractice suits because of the high fees that attorneys may collect if they win
  • There is a growing resentment against large for-profit healthcare firms and managed care plans

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Reducing Medical Malpractice Costs

  • Methods to reduce medical malpractice costs include:
  • Not charging for “never events”
  • Laws allowing physicians to apologize without allowing the admission to be used against them
  • Prompt disclosure of medical errors
  • Remedial action against problem physicians
  • Emphasis on risk management principles

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Reducing Medical Malpractice Costs (Continued)

  • The major impact of the ACA on medical sector liability claims is the sheer number of new prospective plaintiffs
  • Law firms are advertising for potential plaintiffs to join class action lawsuits
  • Medically related class actions include defective replacement joints, asbestos-related mesothelioma and ineffective drugs
  • Class actions are costly to defend and can result in significant legal liability

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Liability Arising from Technological Change

  • Cyberliability refers to the risk that an unauthorized party gains access to an organization’s data
  • Individuals who have their personal information exposed through a cyberattack may seek damages
  • Hydraulic fracturing can create liability exposures by causing tremors in areas not subject to seismic activity, and contaminating groundwater
  • Organizations using unmanned aircraft systems, or drones, are liable for damages caused by the drone and improper use

19-*

Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Liability Arising from Societal Change

  • The “sharing economy” is creating new exposures
  • Automobile and homeowners insurance policies are evolving to address new liabilities arising from:
  • Car sharing
  • Ride sharing
  • Room sharing