statistics project
Deliverable 1 – Proposal
|
Unacceptable (6 points each) |
Acceptable (11 points each) |
Excellent (15 points each) |
|
· Product description missing · Tasks needed missing/incorrect · Time needed missing/incorrect · Money needed and asked for missing/incorrect · Profit and time needed missing/incorrect · Return on investment missing/incorrect
|
· Product description needed detail or confusing or illogical · Tasks needed to complete needed detail or confusing or illogical · Time needed to complete needed detail or confusing or illogical · Money needed and asked for needed detail or confusing or illogical · Profit and time needed to complete needed detail or confusing or illogical · Return on investment needed detail or confusing or illogical |
· Product description detailed, thorough, and logical · Tasks needed is detailed, thorough, and logical · Time needed is detailed, thorough, and logical · Money needed and asked for is detailed, thorough, and logical · Profit and time needed is detailed, thorough, and logical · Return on investment is detailed, thorough, and logical
|
Deliverable 2 – Simulation Overview
|
Unacceptable (7 points each) |
Acceptable (11 points each) |
Excellent (15 points each) |
|
· Flowchart missing/incorrect · Equation missing/incorrect · Tasks – missing/incorrect · Start/end times · Alpha/beta used · Distribution · Why that distribution · Cost of task · Output description missing/incorrect · Time Needed decision missing/incorrect · Cost-Revenue-Profit graph missing/incorrect |
· Flowchart needs work · Equation is not correct or does not match flowchart · Tasks – 4 points each · Start/end times not clear, logical, cited · Alpha/beta used not clear, logical choice · Distribution description or picture needs work · Why that distribution is explained but not clear · Cost of task is not logical or cited · Output – descriptions of final output and how simulation was conducted is not clear, detailed, logical · Time Needed decision is not explained or defended · Cost-Revenue-Profit graph is not explained in detail or graph given |
· Flowchart is clear and visually makes sense · Equation is correct and matches flowchart · Tasks – 6 points each · Start/end times clear, logical, cited · Alpha/beta used clear, logical choice · Distribution description or picture · Why that distribution is explained in detail · Cost of task is logical and cited · Output – descriptions of final output and how simulation was conducted is clear, detailed, logical · Time Needed decision is explained and defended · Cost-Revenue-Profit graph explained in detail and graph given
|
Overall
|
Unacceptable (0 points) |
Acceptable (5 points each) |
Excellent (10 points each) |
|
Unorganized, hard to read, lacks clarity and logic, lots of grammar/spelling issues |
- |
Organized, easy to read, clear and logical, no grammar/spelling issues |