Business Plan for Bitfit Care
|
Marking guide weighted at 50% - Business Plan
|
||
|
Assessment: Entrepreneurship Individual Business Plan Student name.... Student number.... |
||
|
Executive summary 10% |
Grade |
Mark |
|
Summary is succinct and accurately reflects all the critical issues. Strong recommendations. |
HD |
|
|
A very good summary of the main points with good evidence of findings. Very convincing
|
D |
|
|
A good summary of the plan albeit with some inconsistencies. Convincing |
C |
|
|
A reasonable summary of the plan. Mildly convincing |
P |
|
|
Poor or no summary. Failed to describe the report accurately. More an introduction. Introduced new material. Unconvincing |
MF F |
|
|
Identification of an entrepreneurial opportunity and evidence of research and planning 10% |
||
|
Demonstrates substantial and high level of understanding of opportunity concepts used Identification of highly relevant academic literature and extensive and reliable industry research. |
HD |
|
|
Evidence of good understanding of opportunity concepts used. Identification of academic literature and good industry research. |
D |
|
|
Evidence of understanding of opportunity concepts used. Little academic literature and some industry research. |
C |
|
|
Basic understanding of opportunity concepts. Not always substantiated with literature or industry research
|
P |
|
|
Limited/no understanding of opportunity concepts. Very little evidence of research or poor quality research material. |
MF F |
|
|
Strategies and analysis based on the substantiated research 20% |
||
|
Coherent and logical strategies and analysis, extensively supported by literature |
HD |
|
|
Well-organised and clear strategies and analysis soundly supported by literature |
D |
|
|
Strategies and analysis not always supported with appropriate literature and or logic |
C |
|
|
Satisfactory strategies and analysis but not always supported by appropriate literature or logic |
P |
|
|
No strategies and analysis description and/or personal opinion, and no supporting literature and/or logic |
MF F |
|
|
Findings and feasibility assessment 5% |
||
|
Plan has resulted in a definite, understandable and logical decision as to feasibility |
HD |
|
|
Plan has resulted in a good recommendation. Most questions answered and backed up with fact. |
D |
|
|
Plan has resulted in a reasonably clear recommendation. Some substantiation of facts |
C |
|
|
Plan has resulted in a fair recommendation with minimal substantiation of facts |
P |
|
|
Plan is unclear and or confusing. Unclear motivation to proceed or not. Lacking substantiation |
MF F |
|
|
Writing and presentation 5% |
||
|
Plan extremely well structured, written and presented |
HD |
|
|
Plan is well structured, written and presented |
D |
|
|
Plan is generally well structured, written and presented. |
C |
|
|
Plan structure, writing and presentation is satisfactory |
P |
|
|
Writing is poor, and or frequent spelling and/or grammatical errors, and/or poor structure, and/or poor presentation |
MF F |
|
|
Total: 50% |
|