HUMAN RESOURCE ASSIGNMENT
T h e J o u r n a l o f D e v e l o p i n g A r e a s Special Issue on Kuala Lumpur Conference Held in August 2014
Volume 49 No. 5 2015
A REVIEW OF SMEs RECRUITMENT AND
SELECTION DILEMMA: FINDING A ‘FIT’.
Mathew Abraham
Maniam Kaliannan
Avvari V. Mohan
The University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
Susan Thomas
RMIT University Vietnam
ABSTRACT
This systematic review of theoretical approaches is to determine whether the recruitment and
selection process in SMEs shows evidence of a strategic ‘fit’ and second, examining the extent
of a structured, innovative and flexible recruitment and selection process. HR managers may be
aware of Strategic Human Resource Management but their understanding of recruitment and
selection process as a HR architecture linking the firm and HR strategy may be vague. Findings
in literature shows that priority research tends to be non-HRM related functions. HRM practices
are seen as less important. The review also shows evidence that recruitment and selection is an
under researched area and no specific research papers provided insights on the concept of ‘fit’
in recruitment and selection. Although general literature presents various models of recruitment
but the compatibility between the individual, job and environment - ‘fit’, as a strategic process
in SMEs seems disconnected and unexplored. This suggests that the HRM functions in the
Malaysian SMEs are treated and perceived as secondary, routine and an insignificant function.
JEL Classifications: M05, M51, M510
Keywords: recruitment and selection, SMEs; person-job fit; person-organization fit
Corresponding Author’s Email: [email protected]
INTRODUCTION
The effort to attract, compensate, motivate and retain employees is becoming a
daunting task for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). Establishing and giving
prominence to the element of fit between; person and the job; person and the
organisation would determine the firms’ progress towards creativity, innovation and
knowledge building for future competitiveness. Basically three issues indicate the
dearth of research in recruitment and selection in SMEs, first, there is a lack of study
on issues faced by SMEs when recruiting employees, second, previous research tends
to be descriptions of recruitment practices rather than any theoretical basis on the
viability of these practices and lastly, majority of research focuses entirely on large
firms therefore the findings do not represent the barriers faced by SMEs (Williamson,
et al. 2002). The evidence suggests there is a lack of sufficient understanding of HR
practices in SMEs and they lean towards activities which are ad-hoc and informal
(Mayson & Barrett, 2006).
HUMAN RESOURCE COMPETIVENESS
The HRM sub domain covers components comprising of philosophy, policies,
programmes, practices and processes (Schuler, 1992, as cited in Lengnick-Hall et al.,
2009). In this instance the ‘fit’ aspect would be the recruitment and selection process
in which the competitive advantage is to establish a link between firms’ business and
336
HR strategies by investing and capitalising on core workers internal strengths. The
following questions seem relevant in this instance, 1. Does the SHRM concept
encompassing strategic recruitment and selection process be able to achieve and
contribute to the SMEs competitive advantage? 2. Do SMEs have actual success in
recruiting talents who are likely to be successful in their jobs (Breaugh & Starke,
2000)? Although there are models on recruitment and selection but its fit as a strategic
element with the SHRM concept in SMEs may be still unclear. Breaugh & Starke
(2000) argue that although there is a mix of doubt and hope in the recruitment literature,
there is still frustration over the lack of progress in understanding the recruitment
process.
A REVIEW OF RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION CONCEPTS
It is interesting to note that Breaugh (2013) laments that the various research on
recruitment is disjointed, without a clear connection between variables that interlink
the recruitment process. In the past the recruitment and selection function has been
perceived as a traditional HR function embedded in psychometric model, without
much significance, but it is now more focused, sophisticated and strategically driven
(Millmore, 2003). The recruitment and selection functions are closely inter-related and
the key elements identified across these definitions are the organisational activities and
decisions taken to identify, attract and influencing people with right competencies to
apply for a vacancy as their career choice (Mayson & Barret, 2006). The process involves finding and selecting applicants whom the recruiter predicts will be a fit and
contribute the maximum to the organisation.
The Strategic Recruitment and Selection Models
The strategic positioning of HRM, on equal footing with organisational strategic
initiatives at top levels is seen as a catalyst towards putting HRM processes such as
recruitment and selection as integral components in sustaining competitiveness. Over
the past 20 years the significance of knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs) towards
organization performance has become more recognized (Breaugh & Starke, 2000).
In Breaugh's (2008) model of recruitment four phases are described as the key process in attracting the right talent. First is to establish clear recruitment objectives;
second is developing strategies to fill the vacant position, third involves specific
recruitment activities which attract the right candidates and fourth is to evaluate the
outcomes of the first three phases of the recruitment exercise. Between the third and
fourth phase of the recruitment process the intervening job applicant variable
emphasises how important it is for organisations to consider the applicant’s fit with the
job and the organisation. This fit encompasses six broad factors construed as
“predictors of applicant attraction” (Chapman, et al., 2005, p. 929). These factors focus
on the characteristics of the job and organisation, the recruiter characteristics,
perceptions associated with the recruitment process, the perceived fit between person
and job, and the person and organisation, the perceived substitutes and the hiring
expectations. When examined using the resource based view the right recruitment
strategies contributes to higher labour efficiency, attracts talent with valuable skill sets,
it is difficult to be imitated, the strategy is “non-substitutable” and it integrates
horizontally with other HR practices therefore they are regarded as a source of
competitive advantage (Mayson & Barrett, 2006; Lengnick-Hall et al., 2009).
The framework of the recruitment process as proposed by Dineen & Soltis
(2010) integrates recruitment models by Breaugh (2008) and Rynes & Cable (2003).
337
As the integrated model suggests there are three stages in the recruitment process. First,
organisations putting effort in generating viable candidates and the job applicant make
decisions to apply for the job. Second, maintain the status of potential applicants where
the important consideration is now the perception towards fairness and the timeliness
of the selection process. Third, the post offer closure when the applicant is now offered
a job and the decision to accept is dependent on the timing of the offer and the
competing offers by other competitors. It indicates the process variables that are
significant at each stage as it involves several aspects that would assist in identifying
potential applicants. Recruiters who are able to establish strong social networking,
communication and signalling, negotiations and influence of applicants in job choice
decision making would be able to hire talent at the right time.
THE CONCEPT OF FIT IN THE SELECTION PROCESS
The Person-Environment (P-E) Fit
The growing interest and importance of ‘fit’ in selection research is based on the
fascination among practitioners and scholars on the compatibility between the Person
and Environment (P-E) which basically is the fit with various systems in the work
place. In the P-E fit construct, the ‘P’ element is the cognitive abilities, knowledge,
skills, personality traits, characteristics, experience, education, values and goals
(Morley, 2007; Edwards, 1991). The E element can include organisational climate,
work conditions, culture, values, systems, goals, job demands, reward systems and
collective attributes (Kristof-Brown & Guay, 2010). The dimensions of research on P-
E fit developed further where Kristoff-Brown & Guay (2010) looked at different forms
of these fit e.g., person-job; person organisation; person-vocation; person-group;
supplementary; complementary and etc. With the concept of fit evolving into many
forms, it is pertinent to look at the operationalization of this fit although there have
been various debates on this (Edwards, 1991). Basically the person making whole or
adding to the environment characteristics that are missing forms the fundamental basis
in most hiring practices (Muchinsky & Monahan, 1987).
The Person - Organisation (P-O) Fit and Person – Job (P-J) Fit
How does the P-O and P-J fit complement the recruitment and selection practices? The
P-O fit is defined as the compatibility or the alignment between the characteristics of
the person and the organisation or environment (Kristoff-Brown & Guay, 2010). P-O
fit is greatly desirable not only because of the encouraging work based outcomes but
also its effect in “job seeking intentions, job and career satisfaction, psychological
strain, organisational citizenship behaviours, knowledge acquisition and sharing,
ethical conduct, organisation identification, job performance and turnover” (Morley,
2007, p. 111). Research indicates the significance and positive outcomes of P-O fit,
and the strong correlations towards work related outcomes especially job satisfaction,
organisation commitment and satisfaction (Hoffman & Woehr, 2006; Kristoff-Brown
& Guay, 2010). The distinction is the congruence of person and job in predicting
individual and organisational outcomes (Edwards, 1991). Traditionally managers
assume the important outcome of the selection process and job performance is the link
between KSAs and critical requirements of the tasks, referred to as the P-J Fit (Bowen,
et al, 1991). Drawing on the selection model that establishes a P-O fit, i.e. the
personality and culture/climate relationship the proposed framework by Bowen et al.,
(1991) may assist managers to rigorously rethink the traditional approach. Use the job
338
analysis and organisation analysis to find a fit between the successful employee and
organisation in terms of both the context and content of the job. Then deduce the type
of person required by examining the employees’ personality (values, needs, interests)
and social skill. Next step, determine the rites of passage for entry, example tests.
Finally the reinforcing of P-O fit at work. It is reinforcing skills and knowledge through
employee developmental programmes.
METHODOLOGY
Definition of SMEs
There has not been any common or universal definition for SMEs. Most countries use
number of employees as their main criteria whereas others use firm’s assets and
revenue as the additional criteria. SMEs in Malaysia are defined based on two criteria
which are annual sales turnover or number of full-time employees in the respective
sectors. In Malaysia the total SMEs now stand at 653,000 which represents 98.5% of
all establishments (SME Corporation Malaysia, 2014). Majority of the SMEs are in the
services, manufacturing and construction sectors. It is reported that 40.1 per cent or
almost 1.5 million workers were employed by small business enterprises (Economic
Census: Profile of SMEs, 2011), which means on average a small enterprise employs
11 workers. A medium sized enterprise employed 859,000 workers or 23.4 per cent,
which means on average 43 workers per enterprise.
Sampling Methods
Five educational databases, Business Source Premier (EBSCO), Emerald Insight,
ABI/Inform Global (ProQuest), Scopus, and SAGE were used to identify and
determine the relevant articles. In addition more general academic database such as
Google Scholar was also used to widen the scope of literature search. There were no
specific time frames determined due to the scarcity of research. The initial search
parameters using words such as “Recruitment and Selection in Malaysian SMEs” did
not yield any specific articles. However redefining it into “Human resource
management practices; Malaysian SMEs” and “Establishing fit in Malaysian SMEs”
produced a few more articles however the search was not very encouraging. Using the
term “SMEs in Malaysia” generated hundreds of articles however many were non-HR
related research. There were some conference proceedings papers but were not
included as they were mainly preliminary studies.
ANALYSIS
Review of HRM Practices in Malaysian SMEs
HRM practices in Malaysian SMEs are limited and it is at an embryonic stage. Between
2006 and 2013 there were only thirteen studies conducted on HRM practices and eight
were empirical papers, the rest were merely theoretical papers. Eleven of these research
papers focused on HRM practices in SMEs. Among all the studies, only one focused
on the relationship between three variables comprising competency, person-job fit and
the employees’ job performance in the context of service SMEs. The findings indicate
that both competency and person-job fit is significantly related to the job performance
of employees in the service SMEs. Employees perform better and enjoy their work
when the person-job fit dimension is realised (June, Kheng, & Mahmood, 2013).
339
Only one research was done on recruitment but it focused on the
effectiveness, practicality and managerial implications of e-recruitment practices. The
findings indicate that SME recruitment policies are determined by CEO (owner) and
if implemented it is to speed up traditional processes and improve communication
among multicultural workforce (Poorangi, Wong, Khin, & Rahmani, 2011). Many of
the studies focused on general HRM practices in SMEs, in areas that have effect on
job satisfaction, organisation performance, labour productivity, quality assurance and
e-HRM. However in terms of specific HRM practices research, in this instance
recruitment and selection, there were none identified on Malaysian SMEs.
DISCUSSION
The Scarcity of HRM Practices in SMEs
Between 1990 – 1997 only 17 empirical articles were written and in an analysis of 37
articles on management needs of SME’s, there is no clear distinction between small
and large enterprises therefore these articles fail to clarify the various HR challenges
and how they are overcome (Heneman, et al, 2000). SMEs are managed by the owners
who lack the competence in managing or implementing HR practices such as
recruitment, selection, training, appraisals and incentive or compensations schemes
(Hornsby & Kuratko, 2003). In most of the Malaysian SMEs the recruitment and
selection process may be managed by one person. This leads to several hiring blunders
such as not following proper selection process, scarce information of candidates,
disregarding information, falling for candidates’ overpromises and trusting completely
the hiring staff’s assessment (Boatman & Eker, 2012). The lack of formal processes in
SMEs has its advantages, first the organic nature of the enterprise, with a flat hierarchy
allows for faster decisions and response to demands of the customers and market,
second there is clear instructions and communication (Dundon & Wilkinson, 2009).
When Hornsby & Kuratko re-examined their original 1990 studies, they were quite
surprised that HRM practices in SMEs had stagnated and faded over the period of 10
years, in fact it was “puzzling and a cause for concern” (2003, p. 88).
Recommendations
Effective hiring decisions mean that a strategic, systematic and detailed examination
of knowledge, skills and experiences required for job success, having an accurate mix
of pre-employment tests, effective behavioural interviewing and realistic job previews
(Boatman & Eker, 2012). Even though SMEs exhibit or face these shortcomings it is
also essential to review SMEs perception of an ideal candidate in the recruitment and
selection process. The factors considered as key elements for recruitment decisions in
SMEs include flexibility, competence, reliability, stability, proximity to work
(location), attitude towards work, personality and honesty (Davidson, 2011, p. 2-3).
These factors in employers recruitment decision is derived from two components, the
recruitment stages and the employer considerations. Even though literature shows
evidence of discrete research in recruitment and selection but it is deemed as a
complementary function. The outcome of an integrated and strategic recruitment and
selection process moderated by the person –job/organisation fit is primarily based on
employer and environmental consideration (Dineen & Soltis, 2010; Davidson, 2011),
comparing strategic recruitment and selection outcomes against the initial recruitment
objectives (Breaugh, 2008; Breaugh & Starke, 2000; Dineen & Soltis, 2010; Davidson,
340
2011) and actions prescribed to reinforce the person-job/organisation fit (Bowen et al.,
1991; Edwards, 1991).
CONCLUSIONS
It is apparent that SMEs major dilemma is the informal, unstructured, unsophisticated
and weak HRM practices without any strategic element (Dundon & Wilkinson, 2009).
Growing firms generally lack three important factors, first, poor strategic planning
and focus, second the competition with large firms for human resource and lastly,
growing firms are not the first choice of applicants (Mayson & Barrett, 2006). Overall
the paper establishes inadequacies of credible HR practices in Malaysian SMEs. SMEs
that are family owned fail to realise the importance of hiring professional managers,
instead family kinship is emphasised, thus creating elements of nepotism and possibly
rent seeking.
Key positions in the organisation are therefore held by family or very close
associates. Managers in a family owned business face great challenges in hiring and
firing when staff members are your family and any firing could damage family
relationships (Caliskan, 2013). Quality recruitment and selection is not stressed rather
a more informal method is used in recruitment. Professional HRM practices are rarely
practiced or adopted in these businesses therefore HR experts should be employed in
SMEs to ensure that the element of “fit’ is not ignored.
REFERENCES
Boatman, J., & Eker, S., Global Selection Forecast, Development Dimension
International, 2012, pp. 574–604. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-0077-5.ch031
Bowen, D. E., Ledford Jr, G. E., & Nathan, B. R., Hiring for the organization,
not the job. Academy of Management Review, 1991, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 35–52.
Breaugh, J., Employee recruitment: current knowledge and important areas
for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 2008, Vol. 18, pp. 103–
118. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.003
Breaugh, J. A., Employee recruitment. Annual Review of Psychology, 2013,
Vol. 64, pp. 389–416. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143757
Breaugh, J., & Starke, M., Research on employee recruitment: so many
studies, so many remaining questions. Journal of Management, 2000, Vol. 26. No. 3,
pp. 405–434.
Caliskan, B. O. O., HRM practices and problems in family-owned SMEs, In
C. Machado & P. Melo (Eds.), Effective Human Resources Management in Small and
Medium Enterprises: Global Perspective, 2014, pp. 113 – 130, IGI Global.
Chapman, D. S., Uggerslev, K. L., Carroll, S. A., Piasentin, K. A., & Jones,
D. A., Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: a meta-analytic review of
the correlates of recruiting outcomes, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005, Vol.
90, No. 5, pp. 928–44. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.928
Davidson, J., A Qualitative Study Exploring Employers’ Recruitment
Behaviour and Decisions: Small and Medium Enterprises. 2011, University of York
& Social Policy Research Unit. Department for Work & Pensions. Retrieved April 15,
341
2014, from http://research.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/report_abstracts/rr_Abstr acts
/rra_754.asp
Department of Statistics Malaysia, Economic Census: Profile of Small and
Medium Enterprise, 2011, Putrajaya.
Dineen, B. R., & Soltis, S. M., Recruitment: A review of research and
emerging directions. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and
Organizational Psychology, 2010, pp. 43–66. APA Washington DC.
Dundon, T., & Wilkinson, A., HRM in small and medium-sized enterprises,
In D. G. Collings & G. Wood (Eds.), Human Resource Management: A Critical
Approach, 2009, pp. 130–147, Routledge.
Edwards, J. R., Person-job fit: a conceptual integration, literature review and
methodological critique. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International
Review of Industrial and Organisational Psychology, 1991, pp. 283–357, John Wiley
& Sons, Ltd.
Heneman, R. L., Tansky, J. W., & Camp, S. M., Human resource management
practices in small and medium-sized enterprises: unanswered questions and future
research perspectives. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2000, Vol. 25, No. 1,
pp. 11–27.
Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J., A quantitative review of the relationship
between person–organization fit and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational
Behavior, 2006, Vol 68, No. 3, pp. 389–399. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.08.003
Hornsby, J. S., & Kuratko, D. F., Human resource management in U.S. small
businesses: a replication and extension. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship,
2003, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 73–92.
June, S., Kheng, Y. K., & Mahmood, R., Determining the Importance of
Competency and Person-Job Fit for the Job Performance of Service SMEs Employees
in Malaysia, Asian Social Science, 2013, Vol. 9, No. 10, doi:10.5539/ass.v9n10p114
Kristoff-Brown, A. L., & Guay, R. P., Person-environment fit. In S. Zedeck
(Ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2010, pp. 3–50.
APA Washington DC.
Lauver, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A., Distinguishing between employees’
perceptions of person–job and person–organization fit. Journal of Vocational
Behavior, 2001, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 454–470. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1807
Lengnick-Hall, M. L., Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Andrade, L. S., & Drake, B.,
Strategic human resource management: the evolution of the field. Human Resource
Management Review, 2009, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 64–85. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.01.002
Malaysia. SME Corporation Malaysia, SME Development Council, SME
Annual Report 2011/12, Appendix 4: Definition of SMEs, 2012, Vol. 78, p. 179.
doi:10.1111/mono.12010
Mayson, S., & Barrett, R., The “science” and “practice” of HRM in small
firms. Human Resource Management Review, 2006, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 447–455.
doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.08.002
Millmore, M., Just how extensive is the practice of strategic recruitment and
selection? The Irish Journal of Management, 2003, pp. 87–108.
Morley, M. J., Person-organization fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology,
2007, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 109–117. doi:10.1108/02683940710726375
Muchinsky, P. M., & Monahan, C. J. What is person-environment
congruence? supplementary versus complementary models of fit. Journal of
Vocational Behaviour, 1987, Vol. 277, No. 31, pp. 268–277.
Poorangi, M. M., Wong, E., Khin, S., & Rahmani, N., SMEs Portfolio of e-
Recruitment: Malaysian Perspective, 2011, Vol. 1, No. 4.
342
Rynes, S. L., & Cable, D. M., Recruitment Research in the Twenty-First
Century. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, R. J. Klimoski, & I. B. Weiner (Eds.),
Handbook of Psychology, Industrial and Organisational Psychology, 2003, 12th ed.,
pp. 55–76, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Williamson, I. O., Cable, D. M., & Aldrich, H. E., Smaller but not necessarily
weaker: how small businesses can overcome barriers to recruitment. Managing People
in Entrepreneurial Organisations, 2002, Vol. 5, pp. 83–106.
Copyright of Journal of Developing Areas is the property of Tennessee State University, College of Business and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.