Diversity management project final draft
Heytheb.hage
project_teacher_review.docxTotal Points Possible
100
Insufficient/Not Evident
Progressing
Competent
Exemplary
Earned Points
Included one interview
(20 Max Point Value)
(0-9pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate
(10-13pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.
(14-17pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations
(18-20pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.
18 - Great sources, nice interview of a fellow employee, but also include a scholarly interview - this drives the credible activism of what you are working to establish.
Writing is free from spelling and grammar errors. Included an introduction paragraph with thesis, and conclusion paragraph. Used proper writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence structure, transitions, and punctuation
(10 Max Point Value)
(0-2 pts.)
Paper is not submitted or more than 10 errors in English grammar and mechanics observed. No introduction paragraph, thesis, or conclusion paragraph included. Proper writing mechanics were not used.
6-10 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Missing 2 or more of the following: introduction paragraph with thesis, and conclusion paragraph. Proper writing mechanics somewhat used.
(6-8 pts.)
3-5 errors in English grammar and mechanics, and/or missing 1 or more of the following: introduction paragraph with thesis, and conclusion paragraph. Proper writing mechanics mostly used.
(9-10 pts.)
0-2 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Included an introduction paragraph with thesis, and conclusion paragraph. Used proper writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence structure, transitions, and punctuation.
10 - excellent overall mechanics, with proper sentence structure and grammar.
Paper meets minimum 5-page length requirement. Provided an APA formatted title page
(10 Max Point Value)
(0-2 pts.)
Paper is not submitted.
(3-5 pts.)
Paper is less than 3 pages in length, and/ or no APA title page provided.
(6-8 pts.)
Paper is between 3-4 pages in length and/or no APA title page provided.
(9-10 pts.)
Paper is at least 5 pages in length. APA formatted title page provided.
10 - the paper was a great length
Transferable Skills
Critical Thinking:
Discussed the problem, alternative solutions, evaluated the alternatives, discussed selected alternative, and discussed follow-up to determine the effectiveness of decision.
(20 Max Point Value)
(0-9pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate
(10-13pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.
(14-17pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations
(18-20pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.
20 - you established a solid problem and created excellent details that covered a grand spread of alternatives from doing major items to nothing at all. Well done.
Communication:
Draft submitted in proper memo format.
(10 Max Point Value)
(0-2 pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate
(3-5 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.
6 - Ok, great information but missing the format and the transitions to the memo. Check out the example for the assignment and get those added.
Communication:
Used proper audience tone for an organization decision-maker (10 Max Point Value)
(0-2 pts.)
Writing is inappropriate, does not use audience-specific tone and vocabulary is not tied to the purpose of the research.
(3-5 pts.)
Writing is somewhat exhibits audience-specific tone. Did not fully speak from the correct point of view. Vocabulary didn’t properly represent the purpose of the research.
(7-8 pts.)
Writing is mostly exhibits audience-specific tone. Did not fully speak from the correct point of view and/or vocabulary didn’t properly represent the purpose of the research.
(9-10 pts.)
Writing exhibits appropriate, audience-specific tone and spoke from a “consultant” point of view. Vocabulary tied to the purpose of the research.
8 - You had a causal tone at times in the beginning. Remember, consultative is very matter-of-fact, yet poised. Maintain that level throughout the memo.
Communication:
Visual markers are used wisely.
(10 Max Point Value)
(0-2 pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate
(3-5 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.
6 - again, you need to get these markers included.
Information Literacy:
Reference page included with proper APA format with a minimum of 3 scholarly sources. (10 Max Point Value)
(0-2 pts.)
No sources used. No elements of APA formatting used.
(3-5 pts.)
More than one of the required sources is missing from the research and/or sources were not scholarly. Some elements of APA formatting used.
(7-8 pts.)
One of the required sources is missing from the research and/or all are not scholarly. Most elements of APA formatting used.
(9-10 pts.)
Used proper APA format Included a properly formatted APA reference page with a minimum of 3 scholarly sources.
10 - excellent sources.
