Human Resources in 3000-3300 words
trangkul
module_specific_assessment_criteria.docxModule Specific Assessment Criteria
|
|
0-19% Fail |
20 – 39% Fail |
40 – 49% Pass |
50 – 59% Pass |
60 – 69% Pass |
70 – 100% Pass |
Areas for further development |
|
Part 1 – A |
No real discussion of the graduate labour market. No suitable references have been cited No structure |
Poorly cited evidence of research into the graduate labour market. Poor structure |
Limited evidence of research into the graduate labour market. Inadequate structure |
Discussion into the graduate labour market is targeted and supported with appropriate albeit limited references. Adequate structure |
Commendable use of appropriate references to aid discussion. Good structure with clear links between sections |
Excellent and critical use of appropriate references to aid discussion. Excellent structure with clear links between sections |
An appropriate introduction Use of sub-headings to aid structure Answering the question more directly A more critical approach to the literature Greater appreciation of the context Supporting references to enhance arguments Use of APA referencing Stronger Career Plan details A comprehensive graduate post which includes entry requirements and skills. Use of tests and results More detailed discussion analysis findings A more critical approach to analysis Supporting references to enhance arguments A more critical approach to findings. Stronger discussion on future implications. OTHER: |
|
|
0-6 marks |
7-13 marks |
14-17 marks |
17.5-20 marks |
21-24 marks |
24.5-35 marks |
|
|
Part 1 – B |
No career path or plan referred to. No graduate position attached. No discussion of test results or classroom activities. No conclusion or discussion of future implications
|
Career path or plan is incomplete or does not detail sufficient information. Position detailed not at graduate level Failure to discuss/ inappropriate or irrelevant discussion of test/activity results Strengths and weaknesses inconsistent with position. Limited discussion of findings and/or future career implications |
The career path or plan is unclear, for example insufficient focus. Limited details of position i.e. no skills identified. Discussion of test results is not detailed enough Strengths and weaknesses not discussed sufficiently or not linked to position. Discussion of findings is weak. Strengths and weaknesses not identified or discussed sufficiently Inadequate discussion of future career implications |
An adequate career path/plan has been outlined Graduate level position identified. Discussion of the results from test and/or activities is adequate Identification of appropriate strengths and weaknesses linked to position. Identification of appropriate strengths and weaknesses Adequate reference to future career implications |
A strong and detailed career path/plan has been outlined Graduate level position details provide information on entry level and skills. Detailed discussion of tests and activities findings Relevant strengths and weaknesses are highlighted based on position. Detailed discussion of findings Clear reference to future career implications |
A very strong career path/plan has been outlined Graduate level position details provide information on entry level and skills. Critical discussion of tests and activities findings with supporting references Excellent analysis of strengths and weaknesses based on position. Excellent analysis of strengths and weaknesses Detailed future implications are outlined. |
|
|
|
0-7 marks |
8-15 marks |
16-19 marks |
20-23 marks |
24-27 marks |
28-40 marks |
|
