Translating Evidence Into Practice
Running head: LITERATURE REVIEW
LITERATURE REVIEW
Literature Review: Hand washing and Hospital-Associated Infections
Name
Walden University
Course Name
April 3, 2016
Literature Review: Hand washing and Hospital-Associated Infections
Most Hospital associated infections are alleged to be transmitted via the hands of Healthcare providers mainly through direct contact when the medical practitioner’s hands transfer the pathogens between individuals or between an environmental reservoir and an individual (Al-Khawaldeh, Al-Hussami, & Darawad, 2015). The purpose of this study is to find out whether there is sufficient evidence to indicate whether there is need for further research on hand washing with regards to the infections that patients are susceptible to in the case of contaminated contact. The evidence from the various studies and nursing journals were carefully assessed to ensure that salient information regarding the research study area were present and were relevant to the study. The researcher took into consideration the ethical issues that are involved in research. The identities of the sample population were not released at any given time and they gave consent for the use of the information retrieved from them (Newcomb, 2010). Furthermore, most of the information used was from journal articles that allow for others to reference the works and findings of the research and, thus, the researcher could include the research material in the literature review (Fouka & Mantzorou, 2011).
Synthesis on the Current State of Knowledge
The United Stated Department of Infectious Diseases estimated the incidence of hospital-acquired infections by 4.5% and with a 5% fatality in 2014 translating to a huge economic impacts (Al-Khawaldeh et al., 2015). One of the main contradictions is the fact that; despite the numerous hand washing guidelines that have been adopted by a majority of health facilities, the compliance by the health care providers remains low despite the practice being one of the simplest and most effective ways of preventing hospital-acquired infections (Bukhari et al., 2011). Some studies point of knowledge, attitude and practice as the primary factors affecting hand hygiene practices while other researches show that even if the healthcare workers from some developing countries would love to adopt best practices for hand hygiene, financial resources is a major factor (Bukhari et al., 2011; Pfoh, Dy, & Engineer, 2013)
In the recent past, studies in Croatia indicated that when it came to general hygiene especially hand washing when caring for patients at the health care centers most of the nurses and other health care providers did not meet the set of the World Health Organization (WHO) hygiene standards (Krleza et al., 2015). In addition, the inconsistent aseptic handling of capillary blood sampling especially dirty and infected hands reduced the chances of getting accurate analysis from the blood sample tests carried out (Krleza et al., 2015). Consequently, recommendations for promotion of hygiene are proposed by the researchers that include washing of the hands so as to reduce contamination of the blood samples that are collected.
Research also indicates that every year at least 290 000 surgical site infections are caused by the health care associated infections (Tsai & Caterson, 2014). Every year at least 1.7 million patients suffer tertiary infections that are as a result of health care associated infections. Furthermore, the results indicate that the health care system spends at least $45 billion every year on the treatment of surgical site infections that are caused due to health care associated infection (Tsai & Caterson, 2014). These statistics are staggering in terms of the amount of money that is spent on resultant infections that can easily prevented. Furthermore, hand washing is considered as one of the major causes of surgical site infections especially during post-operation health care provisions (Tsai & Caterson, 2014). Most of the health care officials are usually overwhelmed with the long hours of working shifts that some of the essential aseptic procedures are overlooked during caring for the patients’ wounds (Aiken, Karuri, Wanyoro, & Macleod, 2012).
According to Aiken et al (2012), most of the surgeries carried out in Sub- Saharan Africa are usually high risk because of the challenges that the health care providers face when it comes to maintenance of hygiene in the course of their work. Furthermore, the research indicated that some of the disinfectants that are to be used pre and post operation are not readily available given the high costs health centers incur when purchasing them (Kargupta et al., 2015). Alternatives such as alcohol and other aerosolized forms of disinfectants would be more appropriate in disinfecting the hands because they are readily available and are abundant in quantity. Therefore, it was suggested that the hospitals resort to using some of the cheap methods of disinfecting their instruments and well as using alcohol runs as hand wash given that it is cheap and it is readily available (Aiken et al., 2012). Furthermore, during post-operation care hygiene is paramount given that it hastens the recovery of patients and it further reduces their susceptibility to surgical site infections that are the key cause of some of the mortality cases witnessed in Sub Saharan Africa (Aiken et al., 2012)
Intravenous medication delivery has also been noted to suffer contamination especially given that some of the health care providers practice inconsistent aseptic techniques (Moureau & Flynn, 2015). Aseptic techniques include washing of the hands, disinfection of the needleless connectors, and use of anti-infective agents so as to reduce the risk of contamination; intravenous infections that have occurred as a result of contamination of the needleless connectors (Moureau & Flynn, 2015). The fact that the intravenous medication delivery is directly in contact with the veins of a person it increases the chance of infections that can be severe and in some cases fatal; therefore, it is important for consistent aseptic techniques to be carried out so as to ensure that the cases of contamination of intravenous medication delivery reduced to a minimum (Moureau & Flynn, 2015).
Preliminary Conclusions
This study has the primary objective of identifying and assessing the behaviors and factors affecting the practice of a simple intervention that is “hand hygiene” as practiced by healthcare practitioners (Davies, 2011). The study question is; does hand washing and appropriate staff dressing among the surgical ward nurses reduce cross infection during patient management? Research identifies the factors that motivate and those that affect the hand washing practice among health care providers (Davies, 2011). The gaps identified are meant to assist the healthcare management team and infection control units to develop appropriate measures for the implementation of hand washing policies and a translated reduction in the rates of hospital acquired infections (Davies, 2011).
summary
There is a need for strategies that emphasize or remind the health care practitioners about hand washing; these include pinning of charts about hand washing at strategic points, provision of sufficient hand hygiene products, periodic classes on hand washing and an introduction of penalties for non-compliance.
|
Citation |
Type of Study Design Type Framework/Theory |
Setting |
Key Concepts/Variables |
Findings |
Hierarchy of Evidence Level |
|
Aiken, A. M., Karuri, D. M., Wanyoro, A. K., & Macleod, J. (2012). Interventional studies for preventing surgical site infections in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Surgery, 242-249. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.04.004
|
Type of Study: Quantitative
Design Type: Systematic review
Framework/Theory: Interventional studies can reduce the post surgical site infections |
Sub-Saharan Africa |
Post-operative surgical site infections increase the risk of mortality.
|
Use of single dose pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the chances or the risk of surgical site infections during post-operation care.
Alcohol-based hand rubs served as low cost and readily available alternatives to the traditional surgical hand wash. |
Level V |
|
Kargupta, R., Hull, G. J., Rood, K. D., Galloway, J., Matthews, C. f., Dale, P. S., & Sengupta, S. (2015). Foaming Betadine Spray as a potential agent for non-labor-intensive preoperative surgical site preparation. Annals of Clinical Microbiologicaland Antimicrobials. doi: 10.1186/s12941-015-0076-2
|
Type of Study: Quantitative Research
Design Type: Experimental Research
Framework/Theory: Effective Surgical Site preparations allows for faster and uncomplicated recovery |
Setting: Clinical based experiments |
Concepts: Importance of surgical site preparation
|
Findings Surgical Site preparation reduces risk of surgical site infections pre and post surgical operation.
Aerosolized form of antiseptic delivery was more efficient that traditional forms of the Alcohol-based hand rubs served as low cost and readily available alternatives to the traditional surgical hand wash. |
Level II |
|
Citation |
Study Design Type Framework/Theory |
Setting |
Key Concepts/Variables |
Findings |
Hierarchy of Evidence Level |
|
Krleza, J. L., Dorotic, A., Gruznov, A., & Maradin, M. (2015). Capillary blood sampling: national recommendations on behalf of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Biochemia Medica, 335-358. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.034
|
Type of Study: Qualitative Research
Design Type: Cross-sectional
Framework/Theory: Capillary blood sampling is important in receiving the best sample tests. |
Croatian hospitals. |
Concepts: Best capillary blood handling gives better and accurate results of the tests being undertaken
Independent Variable: Aseptic techniques
Dependent Variable: Sample test results
Controlled Variable: Capillary blood samples
|
Few hospitals complied with the WHO requirements for capillary blood sample handling.
Alcohol use in hand washing reduces sample contamination.
Aseptic techniques in blood sampling handling increases test results accuracy |
Level III |
|
Moureau, N. L., & Flynn, J. (2015, May 14). Disinfection of Needleless Connector Hubs: Clinical Evidence Systematic Review. Nursing Research and Practice. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/796762
|
Type of Study: Qualitative Research
Design Type: Systematic Research
Framework/Theory: Break in aseptic techniques increases the chances of contracting infections resulting from the contaminations of the catheters. |
Different Nursing databases were used in the experiment that had relevant literature concerning the area of study |
Concepts: Needleless connectors are responsible for at least 50% of infections through because of inconsistent aseptic processes.
Controlled Variable: Capillary blood samples
|
Aseptic techniques reduced the chances of contaminating intravenous medication while treating a patient.
Passive disinfection caps reduced the risks of contaminating the catheters used for intravenous medication delivery |
Level III |
|
Tsai, D. M., & Caterson, E. J. (2014, October 11). Current preventive measures for health-care associated surgical site infections: a review. Patient Safety in Surgery. Doi: 10.1186/s13037-014-0042-5
|
Type of Study Qualitative Study
Design Type Mixed method
Framework/Theory Healthcare Associated infections are very costly to not only to the hospital but to the patients. |
Various nursing database were used with literature concerning the salient issues on Healthcare associated infections. |
Exemplary hygiene ensures that healthcare associated infections are reduced if employed at every stage.
Independent variable : Maintenance of hygiene
Dependent variable : Healthcare Associated Infections
|
Surgical site infections lead to at least 290 000 Healthcare associated infections and cause about 8000 deaths every year.
$45 billion is spent annually to treat healthcare associated infections that could have been prevented.
|
Level V |
References
Aiken, A. M., Karuri, D. M., Wanyoro, A. K., & Macleod, J. (2012). Interventional studies for preventing surgical site infections in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Surgery, 242-249. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.04.004
Al-Khawaldeh, O., Al-Hussami, M., & Darawad, M. (2015). Influence of Nursing Students Handwashing Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes on Their Handwashing Compliance. Scientific Research Publishing. Doi: http://dx.doi.org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.4236/health.2015.75068
Bukhari, S., Hussain, W., Banjar, A., Almaimani, W., Karima, T., & Fatani, M. (2011). Hand hygiene compliance rate among healthcare professionals. PubMed - NCBI. Ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved 1 April 2016, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21556474
Davies, K. S. (2011). Formulating the evidence-based practice question: A review of the frameworks. Evidence-Based library and information Practice, 6 (2), 75–80. Retrieved from https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/viewFile/9741/8144
Fouka, G., & Mantzorou, M. (2011). What are the major ethical issues in conducting research? Is there a conflict between the research ethics and the nature of nursing? Health Science Journal, 3-14.
Kargupta, R., Hull, G. J., Rood, K. D., Galloway, J., Matthews, C. f., Dale, P. S., & Sengupta, S. (2015). Foaming Betadine Spray as a potential agent for non-labor-intensive preoperative surgical site preparation. Annals of Clinical Microbiologicaland Antimicrobials. doi: 10.1186/s12941-015-0076-2
Krleza, J. L., Dorotic, A., Gruznov, A., & Maradin, M. (2015). Capillary blood sampling: national recommendations on behalf of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Biochemia Medica, 335-358. DOI: 10.11613/BM.2015.034
Moureau, N. L., & Flynn, J. (2015, May 14). Disinfection of Needleless Connector Hubs: Clinical Evidence Systematic Review. Nursing Researcj and Practice. Moureau, N. L., & Flynn, J. (2015, May 14). Disinfection of Needleless Connector Hubs: Clinical Evidence Systematic Review. Nursing Research and Practice. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/796762
Newcomb, P. (2010). Evolving fairness in research on human subjects. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 123-124. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6171.2010.00233.x
Pfoh, E., Dy, S., & Engineer, C. (2013). Interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance: Brief update review. Agency for healthcare research and quality (US). doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001769
Polit, D., & Beck, C. T. (2012). research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadephia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
Tsai, D. M., & Caterson, E. J. (2014, October 11). Current preventive measures for health-care associated surgical site infections: a review. Patient Safety in Surgery. Doi: 10.1186/s13037-014-0042-5
Walden University M.S. in Nursing
Formative Evaluation Criteria for Applications and Formal Papers
|
Categories and Criteria |
|
Points |
|
QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED - 35 Possible Points |
||
|
1. The extent to which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking (0-30 Points) |
||
|
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. |
25-30 |
|
|
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. |
20-24 |
|
|
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed. |
16-19 |
|
|
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed. |
0-15 |
|
|
2. Purpose of the paper is clear (0-5 Points) |
||
|
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
5 |
|
|
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. |
4 |
|
|
Purpose of the assignment is vague. |
1-3 |
|
|
No purpose statement was provided. |
0 |
|
|
ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS - 50 Possible Points The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to- |
|
|
|
1. Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts (0-10 Points) |
||
|
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts. |
9-10 |
|
|
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. |
8 |
|
|
Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts. |
5-7 |
|
|
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. |
0-4 |
|
|
2. Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources (0-20 Points) |
||
|
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 3-4 course resources to support point of view. |
15-20 |
|
|
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 3 to 4 course resources to support major points and point of view. |
10-14 |
|
|
Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view. |
3-9 |
|
|
Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resource to support major points and point of view. |
0-2 |
|
|
3. Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. (0-20 Points) |
||
|
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice. |
18-20 |
|
|
Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. |
16-17 |
|
|
Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped. |
14-15 |
|
|
Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. |
0-13 |
|