|
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
|
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
|
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
|
4
Good
85.00%
|
5
Excellent
100.00%
|
|
80.0 %Content
|
|
|
30.0 %Each case study is labeled with relevant theorist/stages. 3.4: Demonstrate understanding of human growth and development and how they impact counseling efforts.
|
None of the case studies are labeled with the relevant theorist/stages.
|
Some of the case studies are labeled with the relevant theorist/stages or are labeled incorrectly.
|
All of the case studies are labeled correctly with the relevant theorist/stages. Demonstrates a basic understanding of how the theorist/stages relate to each case study.
|
All of the case studies are labeled correctly with the relevant theorist/stages. Demonstrates an advanced understanding of how the theorist/stages relate to each case study.
|
All of the case studies are labeled correctly with the relevant theorist/stages. Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of how the theorist/stages relate to each case study.
|
|
|
10.0 %Each case study is at least 250 words in length.
|
None of the case studies are at least 250 words in length.
|
Some of the case studies are at least 250 words in length. Demonstrates a minimal understanding of how the theorist/stages relate to each case study.
|
All of the case studies are at least 250 words in length. Demonstrates a basic understanding of how the theorist/stages relate to each case study.
|
All of the case studies are at least 250 words in length. Demonstrates an advanced understanding of how the theorist/stages relate to each case study.
|
All of the case studies are at least 250 words in length. Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of how the theorist/stages relate to each case study.
|
|
|
30.0 %Each case study includes how the student, as a therapist, would plan to work with someone at the identified stage. 3.4: Demonstrate understanding of human growth and development and how they impact counseling efforts.
|
The case studies did not demonstrate how the student, as a therapist, would plan to work with someone at the identified stage.
|
The case studies demonstrate a minimal understanding of how the student, as a therapist, would plan to work with someone at the identified stage.
|
The case studies demonstrate a basic understanding of how the student, as a therapist, would plan to work with someone at the identified stage.
|
The case studies demonstrate an advanced understanding of how the student, as a therapist, would plan to work with someone at the identified stage.
|
The case studies demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of how the student, as a therapist, would plan to work with someone at the identified stage.
|
|
|
10.0 %The stages of early childhood development selected are accurate as well as the associated case study. 3.4: Demonstrate understanding of human growth and development and how they impact counseling efforts.
|
The case studies did not accurately demonstrate the stages of early childhood development.
|
The case studies demonstrate a minimal understanding of the stages of early childhood development.
|
The case studies demonstrate a basic understanding of the stages of early childhood development.
|
The case studies demonstrate an advanced understanding of the stages of early childhood development.
|
The case studies demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the stages of early childhood development.
|
|
|
10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
|
10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.)
|
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
|
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
|
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
|
|
|
10.0 %Format
|
|
|
10.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
|
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
|
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
|
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
|
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
|
All format elements are correct.
|
|
|
100 %Total Weightage
|
|
|
jessscaprayvr18
rubric.docx
0
