see attachment

9.docx

Home >Psychology homework help >see attachment

Discussion 1: High-Stakes Testing

Achievement tests have both benefits and limitations, and they are often used in making multiple academic decisions such as academic placement for students with exceptionalities or who are potentially gifted in some way. Achievement tests measure what students have learned or their scope of knowledge. There is, however, some considerable debate over the appropriate uses of such tests, particularly high-stakes testing.

High-stakes testing is a process in which a test is given that has significant consequences for the test taker if he or she does not pass the test or achieve a certain score. Examples include high school graduation tests, entrance exams into universities, and other methods of making academic placements. The debate brings to light whether high-stakes testing is a valid process in measuring academic achievement and whether or not it is a fair method of assessment.

For this Discussion, consider the benefits and consequences associated with high-stakes testing and whether or not high-stakes testing should be used in academic achievement.

With these thoughts in mind:

Post by Day 3 a brief explanation of two benefits and two consequences of high-stakes achievement testing. Then explain whether or not high-stakes testing should be used to measure academic achievement. Use the Learning Resources and the current literature to support your response.

Discussion 2: Relevance of Achievement Testing

While achievement testing is most commonly used in school settings, it can also be beneficial in clinical settings and helps guide clinical decisions and therapeutic interventions. Achievement tests provide a clinician with information related to a client’s language skills, reading level, comprehension, and problem-solving abilities. With this information, clinicians can devise interventions that meet the client’s abilities, or carefully choose interventions that are valid only for certain levels of achievement or ability. For example, it would be inappropriate to devise an intricate intervention or use highly complex words in a therapeutic interaction when a client’s language and comprehension skills are not advanced enough to adequately understand and participate in the intervention.

For this Discussion, review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider the benefits of integrating the results of achievement tests in clinical practice.

With these thoughts in mind:

Post by Day 4 a brief explanation of the relevance of achievement testing in clinical practice. Then, describe three instances in which you might integrate the data from achievement testing in case conceptualizations and explain how. Be specific and use the Learning Resources and the current literature to support your response.