Mock Individual Assessment Final Draft

Unsatisfactory

77% or lower

Emerging

78 – 82%

(C+ to B-)

Proficient

83 – 89%

(B to B+)

Exemplary

90 – 100 %

(A- to A)

Points

Assignment Components

Create a list of mock-interview questions that you would ask the person in your selected vignette.

CO: 3

PO 3

ILO 3,6

Creation of mock-interview question list is based on a chosen vignette, but it is either mostly not appropriate and/or not complete.

Creation of mock-interview question list is based on a chosen vignette and it is only partially inappropriate and/or incomplete.

Creation of mock-interview question list is based on a chosen vignette and it is appropriate and complete.

Creation of mock-interview question list is based on chosen vignette and it is appropriate and complete.

Many subtleties were identified when creating question list.

/48 pts.

Create a list of referral questions in relation to your chosen vignette. CO: 3

PO 3

ILO 3,6

Created referral question list in relation to one’s chosen vignette is present, but it is mostly incomplete and inappropriate.

Created referral question list in relation to one’s chosen vignette is present and is only somewhat incomplete and inappropriate.

Created referral question list in relation to one’s chosen vignette is complete and appropriate.

Created referral question list in relation to one’s chosen vignette is complete and appropriate.

Many subtleties were identified in the creation of the question list.

/48 pts.

Discuss pertinent multicultural considerations for interview and referral questions, assessments, findings and recommendations.

CO 7

PO 5

ILO 2,4,6

Questions lack multicultural sensitivity. Cultural influences are ignored in the selection of assessments. Cultural sensitivity is lacking in findings and recommendations.

Some questions are multiculturally sensitive while others ignore potential cultural influences. Cultural influences are ignored in the selection of assessments. Cultural sensitivity is evident in the some findings and recommendations but neglected in others.

Questions are multiculturally sensitive and appropriate. Cultural influences are noted in the selection of assessments. Cultural sensitivity is evident in the findings and recommendations.

Questions are multiculturally sensitive and appropriate and include explorations of cultural influences with the client. Cultural influences are noted in the selection of assessments and supported by normed research. Cultural sensitivity is evident in the findings and recommendations.

/48 pts

Synthesize all of the information to create a complete Forensic Mental Health Professional Individual Assessment Report that includes all required components (i.e. reason for referral, presentation data, background data, objective testing) and based on diagnostic impressions based on DSM-5.

CO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6

PO 3

ILO 3,6

Synthesis of the information to create a complete Forensic Mental Health Professional Individual Assessment Report that includes all required components (i.e. reason for referral, presentation data, background data, objective testing) and based on DSM-IV-TR is present, but it is incomplete, inaccurate and lacks detail.

Synthesis of the information to create a complete Forensic Mental Health Professional Individual Assessment Report that includes all required components (i.e. reason for referral, presentation data, background data, objective testing) and based on DSM-IV-TR is present and it is only partially incomplete, inaccurate and detailed.

Synthesis of the information to create a complete Forensic Mental Health Professional Individual Assessment Report that includes all required components (i.e. reason for referral, presentation data, background data, objective testing) and based on diagnostic impressions based on DSM-IV-TR is complete, concise and accurate.

Synthesis of the information to create a complete Forensic Mental Health Professional Individual Assessment Report that includes all required components (i.e. reason for referral, presentation data, background data, objective testing) and based on diagnostic impressions based on DSM-IV-TR is complete, concise and accurate.

Concepts of each technique selected, including interview, mental status evaluation, and psychological testing is clearly stated.

Assessment clearly demonstrates application to the case with thorough descriptions of how the information ties together to develop impressions and conclusions.

/64 pts.

Synthesize data and write a reflection Statement answering all seven required questions.

CO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6

PO 3

ILO 3,6

Analysis of data in the form of a Reflection Statement answering all seven required questions is present, but it is mostly incomplete, inaccurate and lacks detail.

Very little outside resources were utilized.

Analysis of data in the form of a Reflection Statement answering all seven required questions is present and it is only partially incomplete, inaccurate and lacks detail.

Only a few outside resources were utilized.

Analysis of data in the form of a Reflection Statement answering all seven required questions is complete, detailed and accurate.

Several outside resources were utilized.

Analysis of data in the form of a Reflection Statement answering all seven required questions is complete, detailed and accurate.

Many insightful details were provided and several outside resources were utilized.

/64 pts.

Academic Writing Write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and display accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

Include citations in text and at the end of the document in the correct APA format.

ILO 2,6

Writing is unclear and disorganized and rereading to solidify understanding is frequently necessary. Although an attempt at ethical scholarship is attempted, it is sloppy or incomplete throughout. Spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors severely interfere with readers’ comprehension.

Citations in text and at the end of the document are not in the correct APA format.

Writing is somewhat clear and is somewhat organized, although rereading to solidify understanding is occasionally necessary. It demonstrates an attempt at ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, but errors are occasional or minor. Writing has good spelling, grammar, and punctuation, but errors somewhat interfere with readers’ comprehension.

Citations in text and at the end of the document are mostly in the correct APA format.

Writing is generally clear and in an organized manner. It demonstrates ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and generally displays accurate spelling, grammar, punctuation. Errors are few, isolated, and do not interfere with reader’s comprehension.

Citations in text and at the end of the document are in correct APA format.

Writing is clear, concise, and in an organized manner; demonstrates ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and displays accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

Citations in text and at the end of the document are in correct APA format.

/28 pts.

Subtotal

Timeliness

Late work Penalty:

Total Score

/300 pts.

PO 3

Using scores from Rows 1,2,4,5 above , calculate their ranking as follows:

Unsatisfactory 0 - 173 pts = 1 Emerging 174 – 185 pts = 2 Proficient 186 – 202 pts = 3

Exemplary 203 – 224 pts = 4

PO 5

Using the score from Row 3 above , calculate their ranking as follows:

Unsatisfactory 0 - 37 pts = 1 Emerging 38 – 39 pts = 2 Proficient 40 – 43 pts = 3

Exemplary 44 – 48 pts = 4