ONLY FOR PROFESSOR 2013

Each student will select a book considered to be one of the ‘great works’ in sociology, in the first week, to read and critique. There is a list from which to choose a book to review and critique, but students can select books outside the list in consultation with the instructor. Students will be required to write a book review and report on the review in a related Discussion Board Assignment.

This critique should be written in the style of reviews in Contemporary Sociology (about 750 words).

Review:

A critical book review briefly describes the content of a book and, more importantly, provides an in-depth analysis and evaluation of its ideas and purpose. The descriptive element of a review should give the reader an understanding of the author’s arguments, while the evaluative element should detail your assessment of the book’s ideas.

Your review should include:

· the author’s purpose/thesis in writing the book

· the author’s key arguments and evaluation of their strengths and weaknesses

· brief summary of the methodology used, level of analysis and sample

· comments on how the book relates to other work on the same subject

· comments on how the book makes a significant contribution to the study of sociology; and the sub-field of focus (if relevant)

· information about the author’s reputation or authority in the field

· comments on future research that may be implied by (or build on) the author’s work

Choose one book from the list below for your book review. NOTE: each of these books is available through the APUS library.

As an alternative, you may email me (by Week 3) for approval with a book citation; or if you are willing to go outside of APUS’ online library for a book and are interested in a particular sub-field, I am more than happy to make other suggestions.

BOOK LIST:

Collins, P.H. (2000) Black Feminist Thought. New York: Routledge.

Collins, PH. (2004). Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. New York: Routledge.

Comte, A. (2000). The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte: Volume 1. [Tr. By Harriet Martineacu]. Kitchener, Ontario: Batoche.

Du Bois, W.E.B. (2001). The negro. Mineola: Dover Publications.

Durkheim, E. 1952. Suicide: a Study in sociology. [Tr. John A Spaulding]. London: Routledge & K. Paul.

Ehrenreich, B. (2005). For Her Own Good: Two centuries of experts’ advice to women. New York: Anchor Books.

Elliott, A. and Lemert, C. (2006). The New Individualism: the emotional cost of globalization. New York: Routledge.

Kozol, J. (2005). The Sham of the Nation: the Restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York: Crown Publishers.

Parsons, T. (1966). Societies: Evolutionary and comparative perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Simmel, G. (2004). The philosophy of money. [Tr. Tom Bottomore and David Frisby]. New York: Routledge.

Skocpol, T. (1979). States and social revolutions: a Comparative analysis of France, Russia and China. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Skocpol, T. (1994). Social revolutions in the modern world. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Starr, P. (1982). The social transformation of American medicine.

Weber, M. (2001/1930). The protestant ethic and spirit of capitalism. (Tr. Talcott Parsons).

Format:

· APA-style formatting

· Typed

· 1” margins

· Double-spaced

· Arial or Time New Roman, 11 pt font

SECOND ASSIGNMENT 300 WORD MINIUM

) Include an APA-formatted citation for the book 2) Provide a brief background about the author 3) Briefly summarize the book.

a. This should include: 1) main thesis of the book; 2) methodology used; 3) key findings; 4) key strengths and weaknesses b. Note: this should NOT just be your book review copy and pasted into the post, but rather an abstract (summary) of your original write-up c. This should include proper use of APA citations.

4) Identify any new questions this book raised for you 5) Reply to TWO of your fellow students' posts.