urban design
Namba Parks
Location: Osaka, Japan
Program: Retail & Leisure
Design: The Jerde Partnership
The paper will be a written essay in (5 pages) arguing for (or against) the role of architecture
and urbanism of the buildng (Namba Parks). It should actively engage a building or design
project at-large in the city through both description and analysis of its impact. The impact can
be gauged as an aesthetic, ethic, or image/icon; or the impact could be more measurable as
demographic, environmental, social, economic or political; but that impact must be described in
terms of negotiating the diverse and complex urban realm. Papers will be evaluated for both
speculation and rigor – so be careful to balance poetics with documented facts; and assertive
righteousness with scholarly responsibility.
You need to use one or more of these subjects to argue the Namba Parks building desgn.
The references are includes for every subject :
1.29 Modernism and Urban Vision 1: Utopia
Overview: Jean-Louis Cohen, Scenes of the World to Come
(selection)
Foundation: Patrick Geddes, Cities in Evolution (selection)
Raymond Unwin, “Formal and Informal Beauty,” Town
Planning in Practice (1909): 115-139.
Contemporary: Reinhold Martin, “Territory: From the Inside, Out,”
Utopia’s Ghost: Architecture and Postmodernism, Again
(2011) 1-26.
__________________________________________
2.5 Modernism and Urban Vision II: “Master Planning” and Economies
of Scale
Overview: Emmanuel Petit, Irony, or the Self-Criticality of Postmodern
Architecture (2013) (selection)
Foundation: Le Corbusier. “A Contemporary City,” from City of
Tomorrow (1924)
Frank Lloyd Wright. Broadacre City. (selection)
Ludwig Hibersheimer, Metropolis Architecture (1927)
“The Athens Charter,” CIAM (1933)
Contemporary: Neil Brenner. “Stereotypes, Archetypes, and
Prototypes: Three Uses of Superlatives in Contemporary
Urban Studies.” City & Community 2.3 (2003).
__________________________________________
2.12 Buying In: Brandscapes and City Spaces
Overview: Anna Klingman, “(M)Architecture” from Brandscapes:
Architecture in the Experience Economy (2014): 189-230
Foundation: Charter of New Urbanism
David Harvey, "Postmodernism" and Postmodernism in the
City" in The Condition of Postmodernity (1989): 39-98.
Contemporary: Rem Koolhaas, Junkspace (2000)
____________________________________________
2.19 Urban Theory as Agenda: Diversity, Inequality and Nothingness
Overview: Joe Day, Corrections and Collections (2014) (selection)
Foundation: Peter Hall, “The City of Theory”.
Dolores Hayden. What Would a Non-Sexist City Be Like?.
Contemporary: Hashim Sarkis, “Spaces for Recognition: On the Design
of Public Space in a Multicultural Society,” New Political
Science 19 (2007): 153-170.
Richard Sennett, “Borders and Boundaries,” in Endless
City (2011).
____________________________________________
2.26 Urban Theory as Geography: Negotiating Cultural Diversity
Overview: Arjun Appadurai, “Disjuncture and Difference in the
Global Cultural Economy,” from Modernity at Large:
Cultural Dimensions of Globalization (1996), 27-47.
Foundation: Saskia Sassen. A New Geography of Centers and
Margins.
Saskia Sassen. Place and Production in a Global
Economy. 299-304
Contemporary: “Urbanism’s Core?” Harvard Design Magazine 37 (2014)
____________________________________________
OUTLINE DUE (3 pages with bibliography)
3.4 The Nature of Nature in the Urban Environment
Overview: Ungers, Mathias. “Landscape as Urbanism” from The
Landscape Urbanism Reader (2006): 35-53.
Foundation: Frederick Law Olmstead. Public Parks and the
Enlargement of Towns. 337-344
Ebenezer Howard. From Garden Cities of Tomorrow. 345-
353
Ian McHarg, Nature in the Metropolis. 132-141
Contemporary: Peter Sloterdij,k Interview from Architecture of Change
2: Sustainability and Humanity in the Built Environment
(2009): 18-23
____________________________________________
3.14 Urban Character as Theoretical Strategy
Overview: Anthony Vidler, Type, Diagram. The City: Revisiting
Paradigms of Design from Rossi to Koolhaas,” in The
European City: Architectural Interventions and
Transformations (2004): 26-37.
Foundation: Colin Rowe & Fred Koetter, Collage City (selection)
Alois Reigl, “The Modern Cult of Monuments,” trans by
Forster and Ghirardo, Oppositions 25 (1982): 20-51
Contemporary: Mario Carpo, “The Postmodern Cult of Monuments”
Future Anterior (2007): 51-60
____________________________________________
3.21 Urban Design as Image, Icon and Object
Overview: Trevor Paglen, “Experimental Geography” in Critical
Landscapes: Art, Space, Politics (2015): 34-39
Foundation: Kevin Lynch. The City Image and Its Elements (selection)
Sharon Zukin, Landscapes of Power: From Detroit to
Disneyland (1991) (selection)
Aldo Rossi, from “The Architecture of the City,” [1966] in
Architecture Culture: 392-398.
Contemporary: Andrew Zago, “On the Demise and Rise of Detroit”
KCRW Interview
Todd Gannon, Biennale catalog essay (to be published)
____________________________________________
FIRST DRAFT DUE (at least 6 pages written)
3.28 Urban Theory in All Dimensions
Overview: Sarah Whiting, “Bas-Relief Urbanism: Chicago’s Figured
Field,” Mies in America (2001) 642-691.
Foundation: Camillo Sitte, “City Planning According to Artistic
Principles” (1889)
Contemporary: Peter Trummer, “The City as an Aggregated Object”
Project 2 (Summer 2013): 10-12
Stan Allen, “The Thick 2-D: Mat-Building in the
Contemporary City,” Practice: Architecture Technique +
Representation (2009): 192-215.