Applying Decision-Making Skills

profilemorpre
m4_a2_workbook.xlsx

Sheet1

No single correct answer. Make a case for your choice.
New Equipment Keep Existing Equipment Straight calc for new equipment
New Equipment -585000 -15000 -600000
95000 -490000 -145000 -50000
95000 -395000 -145000 -50000
95000 -300000 -145000 -50000
95000 -205000 -145000 -50000
95000 -110000 -145000 -50000
95000 -15000 0.1578947368 1.8947368421 6 years 2 months -145000 -50000
95000 80000 -145000 -50000
95000 -145000 -50000
95000 -145000 -50000
95000 -145000 -50000
Payback calculation (when even cash flows) NPV -$905,962.23 -$907,228.36
NPV -$1,266.12 6.1578947368
IRR 9.95% -$1,266.12
Payback 6 years 2 months
IRR
IRR requires a positive cash flow as well as negative cash flows. Therefore, when all cash flows are cash outflows, IRR cannot be calculcated.
Also, if there are no positive cash flows, there is no payback period.
For keeping the existing equipment, you could try to argue that you're "saving" the $600,000 that it would cost for the replacement equipment, therefore, the initial
cash flow would be a positive $585,000. This would result in the following calculations.
585000 Following the "assumption" that the $585,000 is a positive cash flow, the NPV does appear much smaller than the two above
-145000 calculations, but the IRR is over twice the cost of capital.
-145000
-145000 This example is not meant to confuse you, but only to make you aware that it is easy to go off in a wrong direction.
-145000
-145000
-145000
-145000
-145000
-145000
-145000
($305,962.23) NPV
21.15% IRR Be careful of IRR in this situation. We have a positive cash flow followed by numerious negative cash flows. The IRR doesn't care
whether you're investing or borrowing. In this case, the $585,000 looks like a loan with a series of payback amounts. The cost of
the loan would be 21.15%. This is apparent when you see the NPV is a large negative number.