Cost and Decision-Making Analysis

profilemorpre
m3a2_ra1_solution.xlsx

RA1 Solution

Required Assignment 1 - Excel Solution
Expected response:
1. The overall break-even sales can be determined using the CM ratio.
Velcro Metal Nylon Total
Sales $165,000 $300,000 $340,000 $805,000
Variable expenses 125,000 140,000 100,000 365,000
Contribution margin $40,000 $160,000 $240,000 $440,000
Fixed expenses 400,000
Net operating income $40,000
CM ratio = Contribution margin = $440,000 = 0.5466
Sales $805,000
Dollar sales to break-even = Fixed expenses = $400,000 = $732,000 (rounded)
CM ratio 0.5466
2. The issue is what to do with the common fixed cost when computing the break=evens for the individual
products. The correct approach is to ignore the common fixed costs. If the common fixed costs are included
in the computations, the break-even points will be overstated for individual products and managers may
drop products that are in fact profitable.
a. The break=even points for each product can be computed using the contribution margin approach as follows:
Velcro Metal Nylon
Unit selling price $ 1.65 $ 1.50 $ 0.85
Variable cost per unit 1.25 0.70 0.25
Unit contribution margin (a) $ 0.40 $ 0.80 $ 0.60
Product fixed expense (b) $ 20,000 $ 80,000 $ 60,000
Unit sales to break-even (b) ÷ (a) 50,000 100,000 100,000
b. If the company were to sell exactly the break-even quantities computed above, the company would lose
$240,000--the amount of the common fixed cost. This can be verified as follows:
Velcro Metal Nylon Total
Unit Sales 50,000 100,000 100,000
Sales $ 82,500 $ 150,000 $ 85,000 $ 317,500
Variable expenses 62,500 70,000 25,000 157,500
Contribution margin $ 20,000 $ 80,000 $ 60,000 160,000
Fixed expenses 400,000
Net operating income ($ 240,000)
At this point,you may conclude that something is wrong with the answer to part (a) because a result
in which the company loses money operating at the break-evens for the individual products does not seem to
make sense. You may also be concerned that managers might be lulled into a false sense of security if they
are given the break-evens computed in part (a). A total sale at the individual product break-evens is only
$317,500 whereas the total sales at the overall break-even computed in part (1) is $732,000.
You may attempt to resolve this apparent paradox by allocating the
common fixed costs among the products prior to computing the break-evens for individual products. Any of a
number of allocation bases could be used for this purpose--sales, variable expenses, product-specific fixed expenses,
contribution margins, etc. For example, the common fixed costs are allocated on the next section based on sales.
Allocation of common fixed expenses on the bases of sales revenue:
Velcro Metal Nylon Total
Sales $165,000 $300,000 $340,000 $805,000
Percentage of total sales 20.497% 37.267% 42.236% 100.000%
Allocated common fixed expense* $ 49,193 $ 89,441 $ 101,366 $ 240,000
Product fixed expenses 20,000 80,000 60,000 160,000
Allocated common and product fixed
expenses (a) $ 69,193 $ 169,441 $ 161,366 400,000
Unit contribution margin (b) $ 0.40 $ 0.80 $ 0.60
"Break-even point in units sold (a) ÷ (b) 172,981 211,801 268,944
*Total common fixed expenses X percentage of total sales
If the company sells 172,983 units of the Velcro product, 211,801 units of the Metal product, and 268,943 untis of
the Nylon product, the company will indeed break-even overall. However, the apparent break-evens for two
of the products are higher than their normal annual sales.
Velcro Metal Nylon
Normal annual sales 100,000 200,000 400,000
"Break-even" annual sales 172,981 211,801 268,944
"Strategic" decision drop drop retain
It would be natural to interpret a break-even for a product as the level of sales below which the
company would be financially better off dropping the product. Therefore, based on the above
erroneous break-even calculation, the decision to drop the Velcro and Metal products and concentrate on the
company's core competency, which appears to be the Nylon product, may be made.
If the Velcro and Metal products are dropped, the company would face a loss of $60,000 computed as follows:
Velcro Metal Nylon Total
Sales dropped dropped $340,000 $340,000
Variable expenses 100,000 100,000
Contribution margin $240,000 $240,000
Fixed expenses 300,000
Net operating income ($ 60,000)
By dropping the two products, the company reduces its fixed expenses by only $100,000 (=$20,000 + $80,000).
Therefore, the total fixed expenses are $300,000 rather than $400,000.
By dropping the two products, the company would go from making a profit of $40,000 to suffering a loss of
$60,000. The reason is that the two dropped products were contributing $100,000 toward covering common
fixed expenses and toward profits. This can be verified by looking at a segmented income statement like the one
that will be introduced in a later module.
Velcro Metal Nylon Total
Sales $165,000 $300,000 $340,000 $805,000
Variable expenses 125,000 140,000 100,000 365,000
Contribution margin $40,000 $160,000 $240,000 440,000
Product fixed expenses $ 20,000 $ 80,000 $ 60,000 160,000
Product segment margin $20,000 $80,000 $180,000 280,000
Common fixed expenses $ 240,000
Net operating income $ 40,000
$100,000

Notes: This assignment looks at ability to calculate the break-even point and demonstrate the ability to apply the concept to make managerial decisions. Be sure to provide analysis and applications of the numbers, and how management within the case will use these numbers to make mangerial decisions. Applications of the concepts is the most important objective of the overall course.