Documentation Proposal for Training New employees- Kim

Element

Excellent (13-15)

Competent (10-12)

Needs Work (1-9)

Topic

Identifies a topic that is interesting, reasonable, and do-able; there is a real problem, and the possibility of a solution. Defines problem accurately and concisely.

Identifies a topic that may be borderline interesting, reasonable, or do-able; problem may not be clear or thoroughly defined.

Topic is illogical or irrelevant; problem statement is unclear, inaccurate, or nonexistent/of no real importance.

Argument

Argument is clear, well thought-out, and accessible to the intended audience. Reader questions have been anticipated and addressed. Contains all relevant elements of the internal/problem-solving proposal genre.

Argument may be incomplete or unclear. Reader questions have not been anticipated, considered, or addressed. Leaves more questions than answers/solutions. May not contain all relevant elements of the internal/problem-solving proposal genre.

Argument is incomplete and unclear, therefore, unacceptable. Reader questions have been ignored and there are many important issues left unaddressed. Falls seriously short on relevant elements of the internal/problem-solving proposal genre, and relies too much on reader goodwill for acceptance of the argument, without viable evidence and solutions to back up the request.

Research

Research is appropriate, persuasive, and fairly used. Explains use and relevance of the research to the reader’s advantage and benefit. Strength of claims is in keeping with the weight or importance of the evidence presented for reader evaluation. Correctly utilizes APA or MLA style for source documentation.

Research may be inappropriate, confusing, or unfairly used in places. Its relevance may not be explained. Claims may be too bold given the weight of the evidence. Research may be too light or general to fully represent the magnitude of the requested solution(s). Attempts to utilize APA or MLA style for source documentation, but may have multiple errors and mistakes.

Research is seriously lacking. Little seems to have been undertaken, and little attempt is made to present concrete or detailed information in order to provide the type of material necessary for the reader’s understanding and approval. Does not attempt to correctly utilize APA or MLA style of documentation, if any style is attempted at all.

Tone and Style

The writing is clear, precise, and generally free of errors. The writing communicates in a professional, courteous manner. Correct, complete sentences are used and are varied in length and complexity. Few or no errors in grammar and/or mechanics, and any present do not interfere with communication; word usage shows considerable precision and variety. Style, tone, and language are consistent with standard business English; the writing contains no rude or overly casual language. The organization is smooth and maintains clear and consistent focus from beginning to end; transitions are varied and effective, creating a seamless flow of ideas. The ideas are well developed and elaborated on with relevant supporting examples and specific details; the writing shows insight, perception, and depth. Document design is good and reinforces argument; it is used for the reader’s benefit to make the overall appeal of the document effective and accessible.

The writing is clear with some errors. Most of the sentences are complete, and some variety and complexity are attempted. Few mechanical, grammatical, and word usage errors occur so that the response is adequately conveyed, but may be repetitive; the spelling is generally correct. Style and tone are generally consistent with standard business English; the writing may have somewhat casual language, but does not contain slang or rude language. Some organization is evident, but the writing may lose focus at some points; transitions are simple. Ideas are adequately developed, but they may be limited in depth and thoroughness; supporting examples tend to be general and details are relevant, but they may be repetitive. Document design is decent, but could use attention or further improvement.

The writing is generally understandable. Some correct sentence structures are used, although sentence may be

simple or repetitive. Enough correct mechanics, word usage, and grammar are present to convey an idea, although many errors may somewhat interfere with comprehension. Rude or overly casual language, tone, and style may be inconsistent with standard business English or inappropriate for the intended audience. Some organization is evident, but with an unclear focus and few or no effective transitions from section to section, or from idea to idea. The concepts presented are generally understandable, but are not expanded. Possibly poor document design that shows a lack of attention or a lack of audience awareness/reader needs.