for Saraya

Scholarly Referred Journal Article Critique Template

Kalshove, K. (2012). Ethical leadership, employee well

-

being, and helping: The moderating role

of human resource management.

J

ournal of Personnel Psychology,

11

(1): 60

-

74.

(Instruction:single

spacing for citation; 1.5 spacing for text; the citation goes at the top of the

page)

In this qualitative (quantitative) article, the researcher(s) studied………………………………

……………………………………………………… The purpose of the research was to

……………………………………….. The resea

rcher(s) conducted a thorough literature review

in which the following subject categories were studied. This categories encompassed prior

research studies on…………………………………………………………………………

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………

…………………………

………………………………………………………………………………… From the literature

review, the researcher(s) (developed a (hypothesis(es) or designed a study to……. or a paradigm

detailing…….. or a model of………………)

-----

(Substantiate your discussion following the

instructions fo

r either a qualitative or quantitative article). If you read a quantitative article, you

must state the hypotheses developed from the literature review. The hypotheses must be copy

with quotes and the page number behind them. The first hypothesis tested

was……………………………… ……………………………………….. (Example)

“Individuals who follow classroom instruction, make better grades” (5). The second hypothesis

tested was …………………………. ………… The population studied

encompassed……………. ..……………………………………………………....................

..........

(discuss characteristics). The method used was……………………………………. (elaborate).

Discuss how the data was analyzed……………………………………………………

………………………………………………………….. The results of the study confirmed or

did not confirm the hypotheses. (State which hyp

othesis (es) were confirmed or not confirmed

and the reasons). There were three limitations in the research. The first limitation was

………………..…………………………………………………………………………..

(State in several sentences what should have been included). The second l

imitation

was………………………………………………………………………………………….(State

in several sentences what should have been included). The third limitation

was………………………………………………………………………………………….(State

in several sentences what should have been included).

The limitations should

be in your own opinion, not the researcher(s)’ opinion. Please make sure

that you use the entire page in your analysis. If you go over, the paper will be returned to you.

Scholarly Referred Journal Article Critique Template

Kalshove, K. (2012). Ethical leadership, employee well-being, and helping: The moderating role

of human resource management. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11 (1): 60-74.

(Instruction:single spacing for citation; 1.5 spacing for text; the citation goes at the top of the

page)

In this qualitative (quantitative) article, the researcher(s) studied………………………………

……………………………………………………… The purpose of the research was to

……………………………………….. The researcher(s) conducted a thorough literature review

in which the following subject categories were studied. This categories encompassed prior

research studies on…………………………………………………………………………

………………..……………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………… From the literature

review, the researcher(s) (developed a (hypothesis(es) or designed a study to……. or a paradigm

detailing…….. or a model of………………)-----(Substantiate your discussion following the

instructions for either a qualitative or quantitative article). If you read a quantitative article, you

must state the hypotheses developed from the literature review. The hypotheses must be copy

with quotes and the page number behind them. The first hypothesis tested

was……………………………… ……………………………………….. (Example)

“Individuals who follow classroom instruction, make better grades” (5). The second hypothesis

tested was …………………………. ………… The population studied

encompassed……………. ..……………………………………………………..............................

(discuss characteristics). The method used was……………………………………. (elaborate).

Discuss how the data was analyzed……………………………………………………

………………………………………………………….. The results of the study confirmed or

did not confirm the hypotheses. (State which hypothesis (es) were confirmed or not confirmed

and the reasons). There were three limitations in the research. The first limitation was

………………..…………………………………………………………………………..

(State in several sentences what should have been included). The second limitation

was………………………………………………………………………………………….(State

in several sentences what should have been included). The third limitation

was………………………………………………………………………………………….(State

in several sentences what should have been included).

The limitations should be in your own opinion, not the researcher(s)’ opinion. Please make sure

that you use the entire page in your analysis. If you go over, the paper will be returned to you.