Correct My assignment

Criteria

Outstanding

Superior

Good

Substandard

Failure

Score and Feedback

Content: Evaluation of Taira’s Role in Business - Currently

1.4 points

Evaluated Taira’s role in a comprehensive manner; used all case facts in the discussion.

(1.26 - 1.4)

1.19 points

Evaluated Taira’s role generally; used few of the case facts in the discussion.

(1.12 - 1.259)

1.05 points

Attempted to evaluate Taira’s role but was imprecise and vague; did not relate the case facts to the description.

(0.98 - 1.119)

0.91 points

Attempted to evaluate Taira’s role but was imprecise and vague; did not relate the case facts to the description.

(0.84 - 0.979)

0 points

Failed to evaluate Taira’s current role in business in any meaningful way.

(0 - 0.839)

1.19 points

Content: Describe specifically Taira’s future business plans

1.4 points

Sufficiently described  Taira’s future business plans using most of the case facts to support the description.

(1.26 - 1.4)

1.19 points

Sufficiently described  Taira’s future business plans using most of the case facts to support the description.

(1.12 - 1.259)

1.05 points

Generally Described  Taira’s future business plans using some of the case facts to support the description.

(0.98 - 1.119)

0.91 points

Attempted to Describe  Taira’s future business plans but used very little of the case facts to support the description.

(0.84 - 0.979)

0 points

Failed to Describe specifically Taira’s future business plans the in any meaningful way.

(0 - 0.839)

1.05 points

Content: Individual Leadership skills Taira needs to accomplish business goals

1.4 points

Comprehensively discussed the business’ environment for change using the case facts in the assessment.

(1.26 - 1.4)

1.19 points

Sufficiently discussed the business’ environment for change; mostly related enough of the case facts to the assessment.

(1.12 - 1.259)

1.05 points

Generally identified  Taira’s future leadership skills using  some case facts to support the description; some discussion as to why the skills are necessary.

(0.98 - 1.119)

0.91 points

Attempted to the discuss the business’ environment for change but was imprecise and vague; did not relate the case facts to the assessment.

(0.84 - 0.979)

0 points

Failed to assess specifically the business’ environment for change in any meaningful way.

(0 - 0.839)

1.19 points

Content: Identify and discuss the relationship building challenges facing Taira and the ways to handle them

1.4 points

Identified all of the challenges facing Taira; discussed the ways that Taira could handle the challenges.

1.19 points

Identified most of the challenges facing Taira sufficiently but; discussed most ways that Taira could handle the challenges.

(1.12 - 1.259)

1.05 points

Identified some of the challenges facing Taira but missed a few key concepts; attempted to discuss a some ways that Taira could handle the challenges.

(0.98 - 1.119)

0.91 points

Attempted to identify  some of the challenges facing Taira but was imprecise and missed key concepts; failed to discuss the ways that Taira could handle the challenges.

(0.84 - 0.979)

0 points

Failed to identify any leadership challenges that Taira must face to accomplish her goals in any meaningful way; no discussion as to how to handle them.

(0 - 0.839)

1.05 points

Content: Assess the environment for change

1.4 points

Comprehensively discussed the business’ environment for change using the case facts in the assessment.

(1.26 - 1.4)

1.19 points

Sufficiently discussed the business’ environment for change; mostly related enough of the case facts to the assessment.

(1.12 - 1.259)

1.05 points

Generally discussed the business’ environment for change but was imprecise; did not relate enough of the case facts to the assessment.

(0.98 - 1.119)

0.91 points

Attempted to the discuss the business’ environment for change but was imprecise and vague; did not relate the case facts to the assessment.

(0.84 - 0.979)

0 points

Failed to assess specifically the business’ environment for change in any meaningful way.

(0 - 0.839)

1.05 points

Critical Thinking/Reasoning

4 points

Concepts and ideas are fully developed. Thinking is consistent in accurately interpreting questions and material/provides solid assumptions, reasoning and evaluation with sound conclusions. Reader can easily follow the author's logic and reasoning.

(3.6 -4)

3.4 points

Concepts and ideas are developed. Thinking is mostly consistent in accurately interpreting questions and material/ provides good assumptions, reasoning and evaluation with sound conclusions. Reader can easily follow the author's logic and reasoning. 

(3.2 - 3.59 )

3 points

Concepts and ideas are mostly developed but may need clarification on some aspects of thinking, reasoning or evaluation.   Conclusions are drawn.  Reader follows the author’s logic but occasionally there are areas that are unclear.

(2.8 - 3.19)

2.6 points

Concepts and ideas are not cohesive.   Misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates, justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draws unwarranted conclusions.  At times, the reader must attempt to determine the author's train of thought. 

  (2.4 - 2.79)

0 points

Concepts and ideas are not fully developed or presented in a cohesive manner. Misinterprets questions or material.

(0 – 2.39)

4 points

Application of Resources

4 points

Arguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts.

(3.6 - 4)

3.4 points

Arguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate understanding of the material and concepts.

(3.2 - 3.59)

3 points

Arguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of material.

(2.8 - 3.19)

2.6 points

Arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; Limited use of facts in case study and essential information presented in resources; May resort to ad hominem attacks on the author instead of making meaningful application of the material.

(2.4 - 2.79)   

0 points

Arguments lack meaningful explanation or support of ideas.  Does not provide facts presented in case study.

(0 – 2.39)

3 points

Attention to Instructions

2 points

demonstrated full understanding of requirements responded to each aspect of assignment

(1.8 - 2)

1.7 points

demonstrated understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignment

(1.6 - 1.79)

1.5 points

demonstrated some understanding of requirements; missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignment

(1.4 - 1.59)

1.3 points

failed to show a firm understanding of requirements; missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignment

(1.2 - 1.39)

0 points

did not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements

(0 – 1.19)

0 points

Writing Mechanics

2 points

Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of written English, including but not limited to capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.  No errors found.  No jargon used.

(1.8 - 2)

1.7 points

Adheres to standard usage of mechanics:  conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.  One to three errors found.

(1.6 - 1.79 )

1.5 points

Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics:  conventions of English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.  Four to 10 errors found.

(1.4 - 1.59)

1.3 points

Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics:  conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.  More than 10 errors found.

(1.2 - 1.39)

0 points

Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics:  conventions of written English largely incomprehensible and errors are too plentiful to count.

(0 – 1.19)

1.5 points

APA Style (6th ed.)

1 point

No APA style errors; Proper citation of source material is used throughout paper.  Reference titles follow APA with only the first word, the first word after a colon and proper nouns capitalized.

(0.9 - 1)

0.85 points

Attempts in-text citations and reference list but one or two APA style errors noted.

(0.8 - 0.89)

0.75 points

Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; APA style errors are noted; inconsistencies in citation usage are noted throughout document.

(0.7 - 0.79)

0.65 points

Attempts either in-text citations or reference list but omits the other.

(0 - 0.69)

0 points

No APA style errors including all places throughout paper that source material is used is properly cited.  Reference titles follow APA with only the first word, the first word after a colon and proper nouns capitalized.

(0 – 0.89)

0.75 points

Overall Score

Outstanding 18 or more

Superior 16 or more

Good 14 or more

Substandard 12 or more

Failure 0 or more

Score and Feedback

Overall Score

15 points