Managing Global Challenges
( M7: Assignment 2 LASA Rubric ) ( 5 )
LASA Rubric
Note: If a component is absent, student receives a zero for that component.
|
Assignment Component |
Unsatisfactory < 76% |
Emerging 77%-86% |
Proficient 87%-96% |
Exemplary 97%-100% |
Score |
|
Communicates knowledge of the role of international governments and civil society in the global economy.
CO: 4 PO: 1, 2, 3 ILOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
Response does not incorporate analysis or synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects lack of understanding of the specific topic within the discipline.
Response provides inaccurate supporting details and irrelevant examples. |
Response incorporates minimal analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects a superficial understanding of the specific topic within the discipline.
Response provides few details and examples. |
Response incorporates analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times.
Response provides necessary details and specific examples.
|
Response incorporates analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times.
Response provides necessary details and specific examples.
|
Unsatisfactory: <14 Emerging: 15–16 Proficient: 17–18 Exemplary: 19–20
______ / 20 pts
Comments |
|
Demonstrates the ability to analyze cultural approaches, globalization, and CSR.
CO: 2 PO: 1, 2, 3 ILOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue within the context of the topic area.
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples. |
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge. Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the context of the topic area using a few details. Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline. Response is supported by current literature, but is not consistently done.
|
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge. Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples. Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts. Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature |
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts.
Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature. |
Unsatisfactory: <30 Emerging: 31–34 Proficient: 35–38 Exemplary: 39–40
______ / 40 pts
Comments |
|
Demonstrates the ability to analyze the political, legal, social, cultural, economic, technological, and environmental trends in the context of the current global economy.
CO 1 PO 1 ILO 1, 3, 6
|
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue within the context of the topic area.
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples. |
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge. Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the context of the topic area using a few details. Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline. Response is supported by current literature, but is not consistently done. |
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge. Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples. Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts. Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature. |
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts.
Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature. |
Unsatisfactory: <45 Emerging: 46–51 Proficient: 52–57 Exemplary: 58–60
______ / 60 pts
Comments
|
|
Demonstrates the ability to assess the value of multinational corporations in increasing wealth, improving lives and communities, alleviating poverty, and preserving a healthy natural environment in the places where they operate.
CO: 4 PO 1, 2, 3 ILOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
|
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue within the context of the topic area.
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples. |
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge. Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the context of the topic area using a few details. Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline. Response is supported by current literature, but is not consistently done. |
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge. Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples. Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts. Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature. |
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge. Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts.
Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature. |
Unsatisfactory: <45 Emerging: 46–51 Proficient: 52–57 Exemplary: 58–60
______ / 60 pts
Comments
|
|
Demonstrates the ability to apply the concepts, theories, and models synthesized in the Literature Review to recommend business strategies for multinational corporations entering new countries to ensure business success in a responsible way.
CO: 3 PO: 1, 4 ILO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 |
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue within the context of the topic area.
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples. |
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge. Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the context of the topic area using a few details. Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline. Response is supported by current literature, but is not consistently done.
|
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge. Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples. Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts. Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature. |
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts.
Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature. |
Unsatisfactory: <60 Emerging: 61–68 Proficient: 69–76 Exemplary: 77–80
______ / 80 pts
Comments
|
|
Written Communication/Personal Effectiveness
Conveys through written word understanding and application of the essential assignment components.
PO: 3 ILO: 2, 4, 6
|
Writing is disorganized; lacks appropriate APA style and format.
Writing is unclear and includes major grammatical and usage errors. |
Writing shows some gaps with respect to organization and rhetoric; has some errors with respect to APA style and format.
Writing is somewhat clear and includes some major grammatical or usage errors.
|
Writing is concise and clear in content, language use, grammar, organization, and sentence structure.
Writing is free of major grammatical and usage errors.
|
Writing is professional and scholarly, reflecting mastery of content, language use, grammar, organization, and sentence structure.
Writing is cohesive, convincing, and well composed. |
Unsatisfactory: <30 Emerging: 31–34 Proficient: 35–38 Exemplary: 39–40
______ / 40 pts
Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
/300 |
Page 1 of 4
Managing Global Challenges
©2014 Argosy University
Page 5 of 5
Managing Global Challenges
©2014 Argosy University