SCIENTIST JACOBS
MIS581 System Alternatives Assessment—Feasibility Matrix
|
Alternative Assessment |
Candidate 1 |
Candidate 2 |
Candidate 3 |
|
Portion of System Computerized Brief description of that portion of the system that would be computerized in this candidate |
|
|
|
|
Benefits Brief description of the business benefits that would be realized for this candidate |
|
|
|
|
Servers and Workstations A description of the servers and workstations needed to support this candidate |
|
|
|
|
Software Tools Needed Software tools needed to design and build the candidate (e.g., database management system, emulators, operating systems, languages, etc.), not generally applicable if applications software packages are to be purchased |
|
|
|
|
Application Software A description of the software to be purchased, built, accessed, or some combination of these techniques |
|
|
|
|
Method of Data Processing Generally some combination of online, batch, deferred batch, remote batch, and real-time |
|
|
|
|
Output Devices and Implications A description of output devices that would be used, special output requirements (e.g., network, preprinted forms, etc.), and output considerations (e.g., timing constraints) |
|
|
|
|
Input Devices and Implications A description of input methods to be used, input devices (e.g., keyboard, mouse, etc.), special input requirements (e.g., new or revised forms from which data would be input), and input considerations (e.g., timing of actual inputs) |
|
|
|
|
Storage Devices and Implications Brief description of what data would be stored, what data would be accessed from existing stores, what storage media would be used, how much storage capacity would be needed, and how data would be organized |
|
|
|
|
Feasibility Analysis |
Wt. |
Candidate 1 |
Candidate 2 |
Candidate 3 |
|
Operational Feasibility Functionality: A description of to what degree the candidate would benefit the organization and how well the system would work Political: A description of how well received this solution would be from user management, user, and organization perspectives |
30% |
Score: |
Score: |
Score: |
|
Technical Feasibility Technology: An assessment of the maturity, availability (or ability to acquire), and desirability of the computer technology needed to support this candidate Expertise: An assessment of the technical expertise needed to develop, operate, and maintain the candidate system |
30% |
Score: |
Score: |
Score: |
|
Economic Feasibility Cost to develop:
Payback period (discounted):
Net present value:
Detailed calculations:
|
40% |
Score: |
Score: |
Score: |
|
Ranking: |
100% |
|
|
|
NOTE
Use your best judgment based on your project scenario. Make an assumption list, if necessary, to complete the matrix. Research the Web for examples, as necessary.
1