Conflict Handling Styles Case Study

1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%

2 Less Than Satisfactory 65.00%

3 Satisfactory 75.00%

4 Good 85.00%

5 Excellent 100.00%

90.0 %Content

18.0 % Applies conflict handling style to scenario one.

Does not apply conflict handling style to scenario one.

Applies conflict handling style to scenario one, but selection of conflict handling style was not appropriate for the scenario.

Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario one.

Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario one and provides supporting evidence and details for the application by referencing some module readings or relating prior knowledge and experience.

Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario one and provides supporting evidence and details for the application by referencing all relevant module readings and relating prior knowledge and experience.

18.0 % Applies conflict handling style to scenario two.

Does not apply conflict handling style to scenario two.

Applies conflict handling style to scenario two, but selection of conflict handling style was not appropriate for the scenario.

Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario two.

Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario two and provides supporting evidence and details for the application by referencing some module readings or relating prior knowledge and experience.

Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario two and provides supporting evidence and details for the application by referencing all relevant module readings and relating prior knowledge and experience.

18.0 % Applies conflict handling style to scenario three.

Does not apply conflict handling style to scenario three.

Applies conflict handling style to scenario three, but selection of conflict handling style was not appropriate for the scenario.

Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario three.

Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario three and provides supporting evidence and details for the application by referencing some module readings or relating prior knowledge and experience.

Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario three and provides supporting evidence and details for the application by referencing all relevant module readings and relating prior knowledge and experience.

18.0 % Applies conflict handling style to scenario four.

Does not apply conflict handling style to scenario four.

Applies conflict handling style to scenario four, but selection of conflict handling style was not appropriate for the scenario.

Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario four.

Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario four and provides supporting evidence and details for the application by referencing some module readings or relating prior knowledge and experience.

Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario four and provides supporting evidence and details for the application by referencing all relevant module readings and relating prior knowledge and experience.

18.0 % Applies conflict handling style to scenario five.

Does not apply conflict handling style to scenario five.

Applies conflict handling style to scenario five, but selection of conflict handling style was not appropriate for the scenario.

Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario five.

Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario five and provides supporting evidence and details for the application by referencing some module readings or relating prior knowledge and experience.

Applies appropriate conflict handling style to scenario five and provides supporting evidence and details for the application by referencing all relevant module readings and relating prior knowledge and experience.

10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

10.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech.

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English