week-3 discussion

Rubric Detail

Exemplary Proficient NeedsImprovement Not Evident

Comprehension 2.4 (20%) Develops an initial post with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail

2.16 (18%) Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea using appropriate detail

1.68 (14%) Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea but with some gaps in organization and detail

0 (0%) Does not develop an initial post with an organized point of view or idea

Timeliness 1.2 (10%) N/A

1.2 (10%) Submits initial post on time

.84 (7%) Submits initial post one day late

0 (0%) Submits initial post two or more days late

Engagement 2.4 (20%) Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying explanation and detail

2.16 (18%) Provides relevant response posts with some explanation and detail

1.68 (14%) Provides somewhat relevant response posts with some explanation and detail

0 (0%) Provides response posts that are generic with little explanation or detail

Critical Thinking

3.6 (30%) Draws insightful conclusions that are thoroughly defended with evidence and examples

3.24 (27%) Draws informed conclusions that are justified with evidence

2.52 (21%) Draws logical conclusions

0 (0%) Does not draw logical conclusions

Writing 2.4 (20%) 2.16 (18%) 1.68 (14%) 0 (0%)

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Name: Discussion Rubric: Graduate ExitExit

Grid View List View

Writing (Mechanics)

2.4 (20%) Initial post and responses are easily understood, clear, and concise using proper citation methods where applicable with no errors in citations

2.16 (18%) Initial post and responses are easily understood using proper citation methods where applicable with few errors in citations

1.68 (14%) Initial post and responses are understandable using proper citation methods where applicable with a number of errors in citations

0 (0%) Initial post and responses are not understandable and do not use proper citation methods where applicable

Name:Discussion Rubric: Graduate ExitExit