Comparative Essay Final: Talking vs. Texting

The act of comparing two or more aspects in writing improves the creativity of a writer in many ways. In life, there exist many things that complement one another and can easily be compared in an intensive way. Consequently, before comparing major factors or activities that occur in life, one must analyze them deeply to come up with the analogous issues and those that contradict. For instance, texting and talking can be identified as major tools of communication. Nonetheless, they can be used differently under diverse conditions to deliver the same message depending on the nature of the receiver of the message and the message to be delivered. It is worth mentioning that texting and talking can be used effectively to achieve similar communication goals. However, they both can alter the moods of the people involved in an affirmative or negative way. The purpose of this essay paper is to pin point major similarities and differences that pop up in connection to these two major communication tools.

To begin with, talking can be through a telecommunication gadget or an open eye to eye interaction of people. Through talking, the people involved can evaluate and determine the attitudes of one another in relation to the message being delivered. This can help a person change the method of delivery by using other stories that are out of topic to change or prepare the moods of the receiver. Many people especially in the field of business prefer talking directly with their customers. This is because through talking they can persuade customers effectively to achieve their respective goals and objectives. On the other hand, texting is equally a good method of communication. The difference emerges from the fact that the people involved in the communication can find it hard to pin point the motives of their counterparts. A person texting can easily lie without being noticed.

The tone of the messenger or the receiver can be used to scrutinize their corresponding frame of mind. This can only be achieved by the act of talking with one another on a common topic that connects the communicating persons or groups of people. In a case where people are talking directly with each other, their body languages can be crucial to measure their feelings and motives in conjunction to the topic in hand. For example, apart from the tone, the facial expressions of the parties can be noted easily to their individual advantages. On the contrary, texting blocks the ability of people to determine the actual objectives of those that they communicate with. Through it, certain techniques of moral disengagement can be encouraged in any form of communication. The messenger can write things that contradict with his or her motives without being detected easily by the receiver.

The costs involved in the two forms of message delivery come with divergent magnitudes. In many cases, texting can be cheaper than talking depending on a number of factors. Firstly, text messages are always short and precise. The person delivering the message through texting tends to go straight to the point as compared to those delivering using other communication methods. On the other side of the coin, people who talk directly might be tempted to talk other irrelevant issues that are out of the main topic of discussion. This can propel the charges of the communication to greater and uneconomical levels. Just to mention, the current epoch requires people who embrace good spending behaviors due to the prevailing punitive economic platform. Therefore, any person will acknowledge the significance of texting at this point in relation to other forms of communication.

Text messages can be saved for future references. Texting opens up a platform whereby both parties can prove that they communicated of a particular issue at a specific time. Due to this, there exist many incidences where this ability of reference has been used. For instance, an offender can be jailed from the evidence of the text message he or she sent during a specific time. Talking on the other hand can be confidential if the parties are no recording the conversation using other methods and technologies. The messenger can express their opinions openly with no fear and this creates an active communication environment that might favor both parties. It is evident that people can come into good terms when they communicate well with one another. The confidentiality of the message portrayed can be used to the advantage of the parties involved in any communication.

In conclusion, the aspects of communication revolve on certain social matters that uplift the nature of human kind. In as much as people quest to relate peacefully with each other in any given society, they must be ready to be involved in effective communications. Texting and talking are used in the daily lives of people as a form of communication. However, the choice of the method of communication relies on the message to be passed across. This can be reflected from the fact that the response from text messages can be slow as compared to the act of talking directly. Therefore, people ought to choose wisely on which methods of communication to cling to.