DTM Phase 2

profileTootie
unit_3_errors.docx

Unit 3 - Individual Project (DTM) Diversity Training Manual

This is what caused me a low score.

  You mentioned the listed segments of the U.S. population, but did not properly analyze the current statistics as well as the recent and forecast trends of all listed segments of the U.S. population (12/20 points). You partially titled Part II correctly, though you did properly identify racial statistics and issues that may cause tensions in a racially-diverse workplace. The assignment required a more thorough analysis of the proactive and reactive measures managers may take to address those issues (3/5 points). You identified the gender mix in the U.S. population and among notable segments of the workforce. You described the essence of the Griggs vs. Duke Power case and its applicability as a case on race to this section of the diversity training manual on gender. You did not properly analyze how a manager may state minimum job requirements legally when hiring (0/5 points), though you did describe how a manager might introduce a new female employee to a department staffed entirely by males. You provided evidence of scholarly research and substantial critical thinking (30/40 points), though you did not include an outline and table of contents to satisfy the format requirements and should additionally have offered more written description than just graphics to answer assignment questions (10/20 points). Please be sure to carefully proofread before submitting (15/20 points). Otherwise, you complied with APA Style guidelines.