Law
SECTION II: APPLICATION-SHORT ESSAY RESPONSE
The following questions are designed to evaluate your APPLICATION
(CRITICAL READING AND ANALYSIS) of the legal principles as applied to
various fact patterns and scenarios. Refer to each specific question for the
associated point value. You may select any combination of questions to reach
50 points. Please be sure to clearly identify which question(s) to which you are
responding. So for example, if you select “A,” please be sure to write “A” on
your paper next to and/or at the beginning of your response.
A. John is not a resident of Washington State. In June of 2009, John was using his
parent’s vacation home in Washington State and was involved in a vehicle accident
with local resident Stacey. Stacey’s car was damaged and she was out of work for
an extensive period of time. Stacey is seeking over $120,000 in damages. Stacey
filed her action in King County District Court Court. More than 100 days later,
Stacey had John served. At the time service was attempted, John’s neighbor was
housesitting and appeared less than sober when he answered the door.
When John filed his response, he made a counter claim for $15,000 and sought to
remove the case to federal court. John is raising a defense that is recognized under
Idaho law, which his state of residence. Stacey’s cousin, outraged about the
accident, is also bringing a suit against John. (Assume the Statute of Limitations is
three years from the date of incident.)
Identify and address five (5) of the various legal/jurisdictional issues presented in
this fact pattern. You must identify the issue presented (2 points); the legal
principle/rule that governs this issue (1 point); and the specific facts relevant
to the issue identified (2 points). This question is worth 25 points.
Introduction to Law
Final Exam Instructions
Instructor: A. Jarmon
Final Exam
Page 10
B. Glen noticed Miguel and his pregnant wife Jacki walking down the street and
drove his car within inches of Miguel as a joke. Police and medics responded to
the scene. Miguel wasn’t injured, but his wife suffered severe mental distress and
needed to be hospitalized in order to save the pregnancy. About an hour before
this incident, officers had cited and released Glen for driving under the influence.
As police were escorting Glen into the back of the patrol car, Miguel approached
with his fights waived angrily in the air and yelled, “I am going to get you. You
better hope they keep you locked up this time.”
Prosecutors ultimately dropped the charges against Glen after evidentiary issues
precluded them from successfully proceeding. When Miguel learned of this, he
was outraged and started making phone calls to the local newspapers, asking them
to do a story on Glen, who he characterized as a drunken murderer. Stacey, a new
reporter, immediately jumped on the story and wrote a full three page spread based
on the information she obtained from Miguel. After reading the article, Glen
located an address for Miguel and Jackie and confronted Jackie as she was just
arriving home. Jackie’s neighbor heard the commotion, as he was out walking his
“pet bull,” who has freely roamed the neighborhood without incident for nearly
five years. However, upon hearing Jackie scream at Glen, rushes over and bites
him in the leg. The commotion has just about settled down, when another
neighbor arrives with his shot gun and threatens to shot Glen. Law suits are filed.
Identify and address five (5) of the various tort issues presented in this fact
pattern. You must identify: which party has a claim against whom (2 points);
what legal claim the party has (2 points); the elements of the legal claim (2
points); the facts supporting the legal claim (2 points); and at least one
potential defense (2 points). This question is worth 25 points.
C. Professor Tickle has been asked by Twlight Community College to attend a
training in Eastern Washington. She has been provided with a state car for
transportation. While in route, she visits a fellow professor who just retired from
teaching at TCC. They have a glass of white wine. As she leaves this professor’s
home and heads back to the freeway to continue on to the training, she is involved
in an accident. As she was approaching the on ramp and entering the freeway,
another vehicle, going 15 miles over the speed limit, raced passed her, and they
Introduction to Law
Final Exam Instructions
Instructor: A. Jarmon
Final Exam
Page 11
collided. The other lane of travel had been clear such that the driver, even though
he was speeding, could have simply changed lanes. Professor Tickle is later fired
and after several unsuccessful attempts to obtain employment, she contacts a
private investigator.
The private investigator suspects that her former employer may not be providing a
good reference and contacts TCC disguided as a potential employer seeking a
recommendation for Professor Tickle. He is informed that Professor Tickle was
fired because she was a "lazy" employee is "drank too much." The employee also
suggests that Professor Tickle might be having a nervous breakdown because her
husband and her five cats ran away. He'd happened to overhear her making an
appointment to see a therapist. Outraged upon hearing this information from,
Professor Tickle speeds to this employee's home, where she confronts him at his
front door. When he attempts to move past her to leave his home for work,
Professor Tickle blocks his path.
The employee's neighbor is out walking his pit bull. His dog has only bitten one
person in the past and it was only because the person was unknown to him. He
knows everyone who visits the neighborhood and since no one is home today, he
had decided to walk his dog. The dog is running ahead of him, seeings Professor
Tickle and immediately launches at her. Another neighbor, just arriving home sees
the attack that has left Professor Tickle with nasty bite to her left leg and a few
scratches.
In an effort to help, she immediately drags Professor Tickle in the back of her
vehicle, bumping her head. She then speeds off to the nearest hospital. While in
route, she takes a phone call which requires her look down and when she looks up,
she has to come to an abrupt stop which causes Professor Tickle to bang her head
on the back of the seat, resulting in a cut to her forehead.
Identify and address ten (10) of the various issues presented in this fact pattern.
You must identify 1) Which party has what claim 2) against whom; 3) the
elements of the legal claim/defense; 4) the facts supporting the legal claim;
and 5) a potential defense. This question is worth 50 points.