Professionalism, Accountability, Best Practices, and Ethics in Emergency Management

Points: 150

Assignment 4: Professionalism, Accountability, Best Practices, and Ethics in Emergency Management

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Determine two (2) standardized actions and ethical practices that emergency management practitioners might implement in order to further professionalize the field. Provide a rationale for each action or practice.

Weight: 30%

Did not submit or incompletely determined two (2) standardized actions and ethical practices that emergency management practitioners might implement in order to further professionalize the field. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for each action or practice.

Insufficiently determined two (2) standardized actions and ethical practices that emergency management practitioners might implement in order to further professionalize the field. Insufficiently provided a rationale for each action or practice.

Partially determined two (2) standardized actions and ethical practices that emergency management practitioners might implement in order to further professionalize the field. Partially provided a rationale for each action or practice.

Satisfactorily determined two (2) standardized actions and ethical practices that emergency management practitioners might implement in order to further professionalize the field. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for each action or practice.

Thoroughly determined two (2) standardized actions and ethical practices that emergency management practitioners might implement in order to further professionalize the field. provided a rationale for each action or practice.

2. Discuss at least two (2) commonly used methods of ensuring accountability in emergency management procedures. Examine the effectiveness of each of these methods toward professional practice. Provide a rationale for your response.

Weight: 30%

Did not submit or incompletely discussed at least two (2) commonly used methods of ensuring accountability in emergency management procedures. Did not examine or incompletely examined the effectiveness of each of these methods toward professional practice. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

Insufficiently discussed at least two (2) commonly used methods of ensuring accountability in emergency management procedures. Insufficiently examined the effectiveness of each of these methods toward professional practice.   Insufficiently provided a rationale for your response.

Partially discussed at least two (2) commonly used methods of ensuring accountability in emergency management procedures. Partially examined the effectiveness of each of these methods toward professional practice.  Partially provided a rationale for your response.

Satisfactorily discussed at least two (2) commonly used methods of ensuring accountability in emergency management procedures. Satisfactorily examined the effectiveness of each of these methods toward professional practice.  Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

Thoroughly discussed at least two (2) commonly used methods of ensuring accountability in emergency management procedures. Thoroughly examined the effectiveness of each of these methods toward professional practice.  Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.

3. Examine the importance of the three (3) values proposed in the International Association of Emergency Managers (IAEM) Code of Ethics for emergency managers (discussed in Chapter 11 of the text). Provide one (1) example or scenario that shows the importance of each value.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely examined the importance of the three (3) values proposed in the International Association of Emergency Managers (IAEM) Code of Ethics for emergency managers (discussed in Chapter 11 of the text). Did not submit or incompletely provided one (1) example or scenario that shows the importance of each value.

Insufficiently examined the importance of the three (3) values proposed in the International Association of Emergency Managers (IAEM) Code of Ethics for emergency managers (discussed in Chapter 11 of the text). Insufficiently provided one (1) example or scenario that shows the importance of each value.

Partially examined the importance of the three (3) values proposed in the International Association of Emergency Managers (IAEM) Code of Ethics for emergency managers (discussed in Chapter 11 of the text). Partially provided one (1) example or scenario that shows the importance of each value.

Satisfactorily examined the importance of the three (3) values proposed in the International Association of Emergency Managers (IAEM) Code of Ethics for emergency managers (discussed in Chapter 11 of the text). Satisfactorily provided one (1) example or scenario that shows the importance of each value.

Thoroughly examined the importance of the three (3) values proposed in the International Association of Emergency Managers (IAEM) Code of Ethics for emergency managers (discussed in Chapter 11 of the text). Thoroughly provided one (1) example or scenario that shows the importance of each value.

4. Support your views with at least three (3) relevant and credible references, documented according to APA.

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present