|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security and Technology Issues
|
Level 5
|
Level 4
|
Level 3
|
Level 2
|
Level 1
|
|
Technology Issues
|
10 points
Identifies at least 10 security or technology issues based on the case study.
|
8 points
Identifies at least 8 security or technology issues based on the case study.
|
6 points
Identifies at least 6 security or technology issues based on the case study.
|
3 points
Identifies at least 3 security or technology issues based on the case study.
|
0 points
Doesn’t identify any security or technology issues based on the case study.
|
|
Security Issues
|
10 points
Clearly describes and relates information security and other technology issues to confidentiality, integrity and availability (CIA). Synthesizes and applies material and document relationships.
|
8 points
Basically describes and relates information security and other technology issues to confidentiality, integrity and availability (CIA). Synthesizes and applies some material and document relationships.
|
6 points
Weakly describes and relates information security and other technology issues to confidentiality, integrity and availability (CIA). Some synthesizing and application or applies material and document relationships.
|
3 points
Little description and relating information security and other technology issues to confidentiality, integrity and availability (CIA). Little synthesizing or application of material and document relationships.
|
0 points
No description or relationship of information security or other technology issues to confidentiality, integrity and availability (CIA). Doesn’t synthesize or apply material and document relationships.
|
|
Risks and Challengess
|
Level 5
|
Level 4
|
Level 3
|
Level 2
|
Level 1
|
|
ID Risks and Challenges
|
5 points
Clearly identifies and articulates the risks and challenges from the case study. Links all risks to technologies identified.
|
4 points
Basically identifies and articulates the risks and challenges from the case study. Links most risks to technologies identified.
|
2 points
Weakly identifies and articulates the risks and challenges from the case study. Links few risks to technologies identified.
|
1 point
Little identification or articulation of the risks and challenges from the case study. May not link any risks to technologies identified.
|
0 points
No identification or articulation of the risks and challenges from the case study. No links of risks to technologies identified.
|
|
Apply Risk ID
|
10 points
Synthesizes and applies risk identification and challenges. Derives new paradigms appropriately based on research and lessons learned.
|
8 points
Basically synthesizes and applies risk identification and challenges. Derives some new paradigms appropriately based on research and lessons learned.
|
6 points
Weakly synthesizes and applies risk identification and challenges. Derives few new paradigms appropriately based on research or lessons learned.
|
3 points
Little synthesis or application of risk identification or challenges. Derives little new paradigms appropriately based on research and lessons learned.
|
0 points
No synthesis or application of risk identification or challenges. No new paradigms based on research or lessons learned.
|
|
Security Strategy
|
Level 5
|
Level 4
|
Level 3
|
Level 2
|
Level 1
|
|
Define Strategy
|
5 points
Each defined strategy solution clearly mitigate the risk or issue.
|
4 points
Most defined strategy solutions basically mitigate the risk or issue.
|
2 points
Defined strategy solutions weakly mitigate the risk or issue.
|
1 point
Little defined strategy solutions mitigate the risk or issue.
|
1 point
No defined strategy solutions that will mitigate any risk or issue.
|
|
Relate Solutions
|
10 points
Clearly identifies security solutions that consist of people, processes and technologies that relate to the risks. Covers all three requirements.
|
8 points
Basically identifies security solutions that consist of people, processes and technologies that relate to the risks. Covers at least two of the three requirements.
|
6 points
Weakly identifies security solutions that consist of people, processes and technologies that relate to the risks. Covers at least one of the requirements.
|
3 points
Little identification of security solutions that consist of people, processes or technologies that relate to the risks. May not cover one of the requirements.
|
0 points
Doesn’t identify security solutions that consist of people, processes or technologies that relate to the risks. Doesn’t cover any of the three requirements.
|
|
Link Solutions
|
5 points
Clearly describes the linkage between each solution and the steps in the case study.
|
4 points
Basically describes the linkage between each solution and the steps in the case study.
|
2 points
Weakly describes the linkage between each solution and the steps in the case study.
|
1 point
Little description of the linkage between each solution or the steps in the case study.
|
0 points
No description of any linkage between each solution or steps in the case study.
|
|
Timeline
|
Level 5
|
Level 4
|
Level 3
|
Level 2
|
Level 1
|
|
Defines Tasks
|
5 points
Clear and detailed timeline that summarizes at least 10 of the technology solutions being recommended. Includes clear and defined tasks for each solution.
|
4 points
Basic and descriptive timeline. Summarizes at least 8 of the solutions being recommended. Includes basic and descriptive tasks for most solutions.
|
2 points
Weak and poorly detailed timeline. Summarizes at least 6 of the solutions recommended. Includes weak and poorly defined tasks for some solutions.
|
1 point
Little defined timeline. Summarizes at least 3 solutions being recommended. May miss clear and defined tasks for some solutions.
|
0 points
No sufficient details in timeline. No summary of solutions being recommended.
No clear and defined tasks for each solution.
|
|
Prioritize Tasks
|
5 points
Major tasks are clearly prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks and issues found.
|
4 points
Major tasks basically prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks or issues found.
|
2 points
Major tasks weakly prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks and issues found.
|
1 point
Few tasks prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks or issues found.
|
0 points
No tasks prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks or issues found.
|
|
Define Resources
|
5 points
Clearly defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.
|
4 points
Basically defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.
|
2 points
Weakly defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.
|
1 point
Little defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.
|
0 points
No defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.
|
|
Remediation Plan
|
Level 5
|
Level 4
|
Level 3
|
Level 2
|
Level 1
|
|
Mitigation
|
5 points
Clearly describes and discusses high level plans that mitigate all technology issues identified. Provides clear detail and rationale to mitigate issues identified.
|
4 points
Basically describes and discusses high level plans that mitigate all technology issues identified. Provides clear detail and rationale to mitigate issues identified.
|
2 points
Weakly describes and discusses high level plans that mitigate all technology issues identified. Provides clear detail and rationale to mitigate issues identified.
|
1 point
Little description or discussion of high level plans that mitigate all technology issues identified. Provides clear detail and rationale to mitigate issues identified.
|
0 points
No description or discussion of high level plans that mitigate all technology issues identified. No detail or rationale to mitigate issues identified.
|
|
Next Steps
|
5 points
Clearly describes next steps that must be taken to resolve all issues identified.
|
4 points
Basically describes next steps that must be taken to resolve all issues identified.
|
2 points
Weakly describes next steps that must be taken to resolve all issues identified.
|
1 point
Little description of next steps that may be taken to resolve some issues identified.
|
0 points
Doesn’t describe next steps that must be taken to resolve all issues identified.
|
|
Finds and Applies Knowledge
|
Level 5
|
Level 4
|
Level 3
|
Level 2
|
Level 1
|
|
Use of Authoritative Sources
|
5 points
Used at least 5 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. No APA style errors in sources.
|
4 points
Used at least 3 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. No more than 1 APA errors in sources.
|
3 points
Used at least 2 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. No more than 2 APA errors in sources.
|
1 point
May have used 1 authoritative or scholarly source in paper. May not have used APA style formatting.
|
0 points
No authoritative or scholarly sources used in paper.
|
|
Citation of Sources
|
5 points
All sources cited. No errors in citing material in paper.
|
4 points
All but 1 source cited. Had no more than 5 citing errors in paper.
|
2 points
All but 2 sources cited. Had no more than 10 citing errors in paper.
|
1 point
All but 3 sources cited. Had less than 15 APA citing errors in paper.
|
0 points
No sources cited or had more than 15 APA citing errors in paper.
|
|
Organization, Execution and Appearance
|
Level 5
|
Level 4
|
Level 3
|
Level 2
|
Level 1
|
|
Formatting
|
5 points
Prepared MS Word document, used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.
|
4 points
MS Word document didn’t follow up to two (2) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.
|
2 points
MS Word document didn’t follow up to four (4) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.
|
1 point
MS Word document followed only one (1) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.
|
0 points
Non MS Word document didn’t any of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.
|
|
Grammar and Punctuation
|
5 points
No grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
|
4 points
Less than 5 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
|
2 points
Less than 10 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
|
1 point
Less than 15 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
|
0 points
More than 15 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
|
|
Overall Score
|
Level 5
4 or more
|
Level 4
3 or more
|
Level 3
2 or more
|
Level 2
1 or more
|
Level 1
0 or more
|
jessiebear932
project_1_rubric.docx
0
