For hifsa
3201 HSL
Tutorial 6
Information on Assignment 2
Purpose of the assignment
You are required to identify a specific risk management issue and write a report which explains the background to the issue and its significance to the industry.
Choosing a topic
List of possible topics (available on bb):
Overcrowding and music festivals
Spread of disease on cruise ships
Alcohol abuse in sporting events
Terrorism and mega events
Injuries and adventure tourism
Structure of the assignment
(1) Title page
(2) Executive Summary
(3) Table of Contents
(4) Introduction
(5) Analysis of the Issue
(6) Analysis of current Solutions
(7) Recommendations
(8) Conclusion
(9) References
The title page is not in the description but I think it’s important (because I will ask them to put the name of the tutor and the number of words)
4
Title page
Title of the assignment
Your name and student number
Word count (excluding title page and List of references)
The title should give away the main purpose of the article.
5
Executive summary
Summary of your report
An executive summary aims to:
provide a brief overview of the whole report so that executives or managers could read the executive summary alone without the accompanying report.
allow the reader to quickly understand the information contained in the report;
persuade the reader that the document is worthy of being read.
provide concise, complete, specific and self-sufficient information that can be understood in isolation.
The title page is not in the description but I think it’s important (because I will ask them to put the name of the tutor and the number of words)
6
Executive summary
How to write it
Write the executive summary in your own words, using a formal writing style. Avoid using jargon.
State the purpose/aim of the report. For example, the main purpose of this report is to......
Describe the procedure that you used. The methodology or analytical process used to process the data collected.
Provide the results of the study. The major findings may include a number of sentences.
Information about the recommendations (if applicable) should also provided.
The title page is not in the description but I think it’s important (because I will ask them to put the name of the tutor and the number of words)
7
Introduction
Identify the topic you selected
Discuss its relevance
Identify the main purpose of the assignment
Provide context, relevant definitions
The title should give away the main purpose of the article.
8
Analysis
You need to go discuss the issue in detail:
Consequences
Impact that these consequences have on the project/event/business
Likelihood/Frequency of the issue.
Provide a discussion of the factors that affect the issue
The title should give away the main purpose of the article.
9
Analysis of current solutions
Discuss the current controls in place: How is the issue being currently managed?
What are identifying their strengths and weaknesses.
Analysis of the issues
| DESCRIPTIVE WRITING | CRITICAL/ANALYTICAL WRITING |
| States what happened | Identifies the significance |
| States what something is like | Evaluates (judges the value) strengths and weaknesses |
| Gives the story so far | Weighs one piece of information against another |
| States the order in which things happened | Makes reasoned judgements |
| Says how to do something | Argues a case according to evidence |
| Explains what a theory says | Shows why something is relevant or suitable |
| Explains how something works | Indicates why something will work (best) |
| Notes the method used | Indicates whether something is appropriate or suitable |
| Says when something occurred | Identifies why they timing is important |
| States the different components | Weighs up the importance of component parts |
| States options | GIves reason for the selection of each option |
| Lists details | Evaluates the relative significance of details |
| Lists in any order | Structures information in order (eg. of importance) |
| States links between items | Shows the relevance of links between pieces of information |
| Gives information | Draws conclusions |
Recommendations
Suggest a few possibilities as recommendations for improvement.
Recommended format for recommendations:
- it is recommended ............ ................................................ ...............................................
(explanation for recommendation1)
- it is recommended ............ ................................................ ...............................................
(explanation for recommendation2)
- it is recommended ............ ................................................ ...............................................
(explanation for recommendation3)
….
The title should give away the main purpose of the article.
12
Conclusion
Summarize the report
Mention the key aspects of the discussion.
The title should give away the main purpose of the article.
13
References
15 references from:
Academic articles (most important)
Industry documents: reports, guidelines, policies
Government documents: guidelines, reports, policies etc
News articles
The title should give away the main purpose of the article.
14
NOTES:
THIS IS NOT A CASE STUDY!!!
Provide examples whenever you can.
The word limit is 1500 words. (there is a 10% margin).
The 10% is strict! 1651 is not within the limit!
Marking criteria:
| Criterion | Excellent | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory |
| Introduction 5% | Provides an excellent introduction to the report. | Provides a very good introduction to the report. | Provides a good introduction to the report. | Provides a satisfactory introduction to the report. | Provides a superficial or no executive introduction to the report. |
| Executive Summary 5% | Provides an excellent executive summary,. | Provides a very good executive summary. | Provides a good executive summary,. | Provides a satisfactory executive summary. | Provides a superficial or no executive summary. |
| Analysis 30% | Demonstrates comprehensive analysis of the relevance of problems. | Demonstrates good analysis of the relevance of problems. | Offers an overall analysis of the relevance of problems. | There is some evidence of analysis of the relevance of problems. | There is little or no evidence of analysis of the relevance of problems. |
| Current approaches evaluation. 30% | Offers comprehensive assessment of approaches backed up with convincing strengths and weaknesses of solutions to solve the problems. | Offers detailed assessment of approaches backed up with important strengths and weaknesses of solutions to solve the problems. | Offers substantial assessment of approaches backed up with important strengths and weaknesses of solutions to solve the problems. | Offers limited assessment of approaches backed up with important strengths and weaknesses of solutions to solve the problems. | Offers little or no assessment of options backed up with important strengths and weaknesses of solutions to solve the problems. |
| Recommendations 15% | Demonstrates the use and integration of broader knowledge in generating flawless solutions to the problems | Demonstrates the use and integration of knowledge gained through the course in generating effective solutions to the problems. | There is good evidence of recognition of solutions to the problems using sufficient level of know ledge gained through the course. | There is some evidence of recognition of alternate solutions to the problems using know ledge gained through the course | There is little or no evidence of recognition of alternative solutions to the problems using know ledge gained through the course. |
| Conclusion 5% | Provides an excellent conclusion to the report. | Provides a very good conclusion to the report. | Provides a good conclusion to the report. | Provides a satisfactory conclusion to the report. | Provides a superficial or no to the report. |
| Overall presentation 10% | There is excellent style and formatting, excellent written expression, no spelling or grammatical errors. Excellent referencing. | There is very good style and formatting, very good written expression, very few spelling or grammatical errors. Very good referencing. | There is good style and formatting, good written expression, limited spelling or grammatical errors. Good referencing. | There is satisfactory style and formatting, reasonable written expression, a number of spelling and/or grammatical errors. Satisfactory referencing. | There is inappropriate style and formatting, poor written expression, many spelling and/or grammatical errors. Unsatisfactory referencing. |
Questions ?