ENTREPRENEURSHIP ESSAY
|
Criteria |
Excellent |
Good |
Missing or poor |
|
Part A: Introduction to the Entrepreneur |
|||
|
Explanation of the chosen entrepreneur in terms of their history, development and growth (5 marks) |
☐ Clear and complete explanation of the chosen entrepreneur (5 marks) |
☐ Good explanation of the chosen entrepreneur (3 mark) |
☐ Poor or missing explanation of the entrepreneur (0 marks) |
|
Part B: Entrepreneur background analysis |
|||
|
Background to the entrepreneur in terms of family and socio-cultural (4 marks) |
☐ Provides a comprehensive background to the entrepreneur including family and socio-cultural (4 marks) |
☐ Provides a good background to the entrepreneur, but may miss some parts (2 mark) |
☐ Poor or missing background to the entrepreneur
(0 marks) |
|
Description of key businesses developed by the entrepreneur
(5 marks) |
☐ Clear and comprehensive description of all the key elements of the entrepreneurs businesses (5 marks) |
☐ Good description of most of the key elements of the entrepreneurs businesses although some elements missing or incompletely discussed (3-4 marks) |
☐ Little or no attempt at describing key elements of the entrepreneurs businesses
(0-2 marks) |
|
Analysis of competitive advantage of the businesses compared to other entrepreneurs
(5 marks) |
☐ Insightful analysis of the effectiveness of the competitive advantage of the businesses
(5 marks) |
☐ Good analysis of the competitive advantage of the businesses, including aspects around reducing risk and promoting learning – may fail to identify some points (3-4 marks) |
☐ Poor or missing analysis of the competitive advantages
(0-2 marks) |
|
Criteria |
Excellent |
Good |
Missing or poor |
|
Part C: Future Entrepreneurial Suggestions |
|||
|
Identifies where the entrepreneur can develop different types of businesses
(3 marks) |
☐ Clear and accurate identification on areas where the entrepreneur can develop businesses (3 marks) |
☐Good identification on some areas where the entrepreneur can develop businesses (2 marks) |
☐ Poor or no identification on the role of business development for the entrepreneur (0-1 marks) |
|
Identifies different avenues or possibilities the entrepreneur can take in the future (3 marks) |
☐ Clear and accurate identification on potential avenues and possibilities for the entrepreneur (3 marks) |
☐ Good identification on some avenues and possibilities for the entrepreneur (2 marks) |
☐ Poor or no identification on the different avenues for the entrepreneur (0-1 marks) |
|
Writing and referencing |
|||
|
Standard of writing
(3 marks) |
☐ Excellent standard of academic writing, with no errors in grammar, spelling or punctuation. (3 marks) |
☐ Good standard of academic writing, with few errors in grammar, spelling or punctuation. (2 marks) |
☐ Poor standard of academic writing, with multiple errors in grammar, spelling or punctuation. (0-1 marks) |
|
Referencing (with at least 10 references)
(2 marks) |
☐ All references correctly cited in the text and listed in the reference list (2 marks) |
☐ Most references correctly cited in the text and listed in the reference list, or only minor errors involved (1 mark) |
☐ Little or no attempt to adhere to correct referencing standards, or too few references included. (0 marks) |
|
Comments: |
|||
|
Marker: |
TOTAL MARKS (……./30) |