Finish Information Technology Capstone

RBT: IT - Network Administration Capstone Written Project

	value: 1.00	value: 2.00	value: 3.00	value: 4.00	Score/Level
Communication Holistic	The work is difficult to follow and is confusing.	The work needs clarification and other revision.	The work is easy to follow and understand.	The work is extremely clear and easy to understand.
Mechanics (grammar, punctuation, spelling, etc.)	The work contains 5 or more minor errors and some major errors.	The work contains 3–4 minor errors and no major errors.	The work contains 1–2 minor errors and no major errors.	The work contains no minor or major errors.
Style (word choice, sentence structure, etc.)	The writing style is characterized by poor sentence structure, limited vocabulary, and inappropriate word choice.	The writing style is characterized by some sentence variation, adequate but limited vocabulary, and poor word choice.	The writing style is characterized by varied sentence structure, solid vocabulary, and accurate word choice.	The writing style is characterized by highly varied sentence structure, vivid vocabulary, and accurate word choice.
A. Cover Sheet	The candidate does not provide a coversheet with any of the required elements.	The candidate provides a coversheet with only 1–3 of the required elements.	Not applicable.	The candidate provides a coversheet with all 4 of the required elements.
B. Brief Summary	The candidate does not provide a summary of the actual development of the project.	The candidate provides an imprecise summary of the actual development of the project.	The candidate provides a reasonable summary of the actual development of the project.	The candidate provides a precise summary of the actual development of the project.
B1. Description	The candidate does not provide a description of the project.	The candidate provides an imprecise description of the project.	The candidate provides a reasonable description of the project.	The candidate provides a precise description of the project.
B2. Other Work Done	The candidate does not provide an expanded review of the other work done in the area.	The candidate provides an inadequately expanded review of the other work done in the area.	Not applicable.	The candidate provides an adequately expanded review of other work done in the area.
B3. Rationale and Systems Analysis	The candidate does not provide a rationale and systems analysis for the project deliverables.	The candidate provides an illogical rationale and systems analysis for the project deliverables.	The candidate provides a logical rationale and systems analysis for the project deliverables.	The candidate provides a credible and well-supported rationale and systems analysis for the project deliverables.
C. Project Goals and Objectives	The candidate lists the goals and objectives of the project without an accompanying explanation of why or why not each was accomplished.	The candidate provides an illogical explanation of why or why not some or all of the goals and objectives were accomplished.	The candidate provides a logical explanation of why or why not each of the goals and objectives were accomplished.	The candidate provides a credible and well-supported explanation of why or why not each of the goals and objectives were accomplished.
D. Project Timeline	The candidate does not explain why or why not any of the timeframes were met.	The candidate provides an implausible explanation of why or why not any of the timeframes were met.	Not applicable.	The candidate provides a plausible explanation of why or why not all of the timeframes were met.
E. Project Development	The candidate does not explain what the project actually accomplished.	The candidate provides an illogical explanation of what the project actually accomplished.	The candidate provides a logical explanation of what the project actually accomplished.	The candidate provides a credible and well-supported explanation of what the project actually accomplished.
E1. Problems Encountered	The candidate does not explain the problems encountered and how they were solved.	The candidate provides an illogical explanation of the problems encountered and how they were solved.	The candidate provides a logical explanation of the problems encountered and how they were solved.	The candidate provides a credible and well-supported explanation of the problems encountered and how they were solved.
E2. Reasons for Changes	The candidate does not explain the reasons for changes made to the original plan.	The candidate provides an illogical explanation of the reasons for changes made to the original plan.	The candidate provides a logical explanation of the reasons for changes made to the original plan.	The candidate provides a credible and well-supported explanation of the reasons for changes made to the original plan.
E3. Unanticipated Requirements	The candidate does not explain any unanticipated requirements or components that needed to be resolved.	The candidate provides an illogical explanation of any unanticipated requirements or components that needed to be resolved.	The candidate provides a logical explanation of any unanticipated requirements or components that needed to be resolved.	The candidate provides a credible and well-supported explanation of any unanticipated requirements or components that needed to be resolved.
E4. Actual and Potential Effects	The candidate does not explain the actual and potential effects of the project.	The candidate provides an illogical explanation of the actual and potential effects of the project.	The candidate provides a logical explanation of the actual and potential effects of the project.	The candidate provides a credible and well-supported explanation of the actual and potential effects of the project.
E5. Conclusions	The candidate does not explain the conclusions about the success and effectiveness of the project.	The candidate provides an illogical explanation of the conclusions about the success and effectiveness of the project.	The candidate provides a logical explanation of the conclusions about the success and effectiveness of the project.	The candidate provides a credible and well-supported explanation of the conclusions about the success and effectiveness of the project.
F. Additional Deliverables	The candidate does not include any appropriate additional deliverables.	The candidate includes some additional deliverables, but they are not appropriate.	Not applicable.	The candidate includes appropriate additional deliverables.
G. Demonstrated Competencies	The candidate provides an incomplete Competency Matrix.	Not applicable.	Not applicable.	The candidate provides a complete Competency Matrix.
G1a. Leadership and Professionalism	The candidate does not explain how the development of the project demonstrated competency in Leadership and Professionalism.	The candidate provides an illogical explanation of how the development of the project demonstrated competency in Leadership and Professionalism.	The candidate provides a logical explanation of how the development of the project demonstrated competency in Leadership and Professionalism.	The candidate provides a credible and well-supported explanation of how the development of the project demonstrated competency in Leadership and Professionalism.
G1b. Upper Division Collegiate Level Reasoning and Problem Solving	The candidate does not explain how the development of the project demonstrated competency in Upper Division Collegiate Level Reasoning and Problem Solving.	The candidate provides an illogical explanation of how the development of the project demonstrated competency in Upper Division Collegiate Level Reasoning and Problem Solving.	The candidate provides a logical explanation of how the development of the project demonstrated competency in Upper Division Collegiate Level Reasoning and Problem Solving.	The candidate provides a credible and well-supported explanation of how the development of the project demonstrated competency in Upper Division Collegiate Level Reasoning and Problem Solving.
G1c. Language and Communication	The candidate does not explain how the development of the project demonstrated competency in Language and Communication.	The candidate provides an illogical explanation of how the development of the project demonstrated competency in Language and Communication.	The candidate provides a logical explanation of how the development of the project demonstrated competency in Language and Communication.	The candidate provides a credible and well-supported explanation of how the development of the project demonstrated competency in Language and Communication.
G1d. Quantitative Literacy	The candidate does not explain how the development of the project demonstrated competency in Quantitative Literacy.	The candidate provides an illogical explanation of how the development of the project demonstrated competency in Quantitative Literacy.	The candidate provides a logical explanation of how the development of the project demonstrated competency in Quantitative Literacy.	The candidate provides a credible and well-supported explanation of how the development of the project demonstrated competency in Quantitative Literacy.
G2. Information Technology Competency	The candidate does not explain how the development of the project demonstrated technology competency in at least 1 of the areas.	The candidate provides an illogical explanation of how the development of the project demonstrated technology competency in at least 1 of the areas.	The candidate provides a logical explanation of how the development of the project demonstrated technology competency in at least 1 of the areas.	The candidate provides a credible and well-supported explanation of how the development of the project demonstrated technology competency in at least 1 of the areas.
H. Sources	When the candidate uses sources, the candidate does not provide in-text citations and references for each source used.	When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with major deviations from APA style.	When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with minor deviations from APA style.	When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with no readily detectable deviations from APA style, OR the candidate does not use sources.
Overall Holistic	Unacceptable	Needs Revision	Meets Standard	Exemplary