please return in 19 hours from now

Criteria proposal

How well they address the the identified needs are the identified needs are the needs are fairly met

Identified needs well met. Poorly met.

How well the objectives are the objectives are very the objectives are fairly the objectives are fairly

Measurable measurable. Measurable. Measurable.

If each letter proposal contains

Concrete ways of measuring Yes Yes No

Progress toward meeting

Objectives

If the methods or activities

Outlined in each letter proposal is Yes I do not think so No

Likely to result in progress toward

The stated objectives

Clear and concise prose the prose is very clear. The prose is not clear. The prose is not clear.

Purpose of the proposal is also the purpose is well the purpose is fairly the proposal dwells

Clearly explained and understood explained. Explained. Much on the institution.

Select the proposal that you believe is the best in terms of its goals and objectives. Explain what caused you to select that particular proposal and why you did not select the others.

The proposal that I chose and I believe is the best in terms of its goals and objectives is the village mall proposal. The reason why I chose this proposal is because it has a very innovative idea. The proposal seeks funds to help the organization carry out CPR training to employees and institutions with regards to cardiovascular disease. The idea of taking these skills to the employees in organizations is very brilliant since these arrests can take place in any place and it has been over the years caused so many deaths. Another reason is because the purpose of the proposal is also clearly explained and understood. This is one of the most critical aspects to be included in a grant proposal. In addition to understanding the purpose of the proposal, the writer of this proposal understood and demonstrated a compelling sense of purpose for their organization. In this proposal, the want for the proposed actions is plainly recognized with data. The most important ideas are also emphasized and repeated in a number of places. This proposal also clearly addresses all the main areas addressed in the regulations and the guidelines.

The reason why I did not choose the rest of the grant proposals is because I feel that they speak so much about their authors. They do not demonstrate a flawless example of writing from the authors. Their prose is not articulate, concise and clear. I also think and feel that the subjects in these other two proposals were not adequately researched. The writers have not demonstrated an extensive familiarity with the subjects of the proposals. The objectives of these proposals are not provided in details. The collaboration is not also clearly demonstrated. The literature reviews of the proposals are not thoughtful and up to date. The objectives of the proposals are also not working towards goals that are long term. The proposals do not have preliminary data to support the viability of the research proposal. The proposals also do not fill the crucial gaps in knowledge of certain areas.

References