Need to write Case Analysis

profilejaeyuk
exam_1_avon.pdf

Avon

Avon Products, Inc., is a global manufacturer and marketer of beauty and related products, including cosmetics, toiletries, fragrances, jewelry, gifts, home furnishings, and health

Case: Avon (Globalization and Cultural Diversity) Analyze the case from the perspective of cultural diversity in the global environment. 1. Identify the factors involved in the case. Consider Economic, Cultural/Demographic, Legal, Financial,

Human Resource Management, Marketing factors and implications on a global level. 2. Analyze Avon’s competitive environment using Porter’s Five Forces Model. Substantiate with

appropriate examples of Avon’s global initiatives. Utilize company/competitor websites, and other media/information sources.

3. Based on the information identified above, what strategy would you recommend for Avon to grow its

business in culturally diverse markets/environments?

***Please'include'the'following'three'distinct'sections/headings'in'your'paper:'(1)'

Identification'of'Factors;''(2)'Analysis'of'Current'Globally'Competitive'Environment;'(3)'

Recommendations'for'International'Growth.'

M G T$439$C

ase$A n alysis$G

rad in g$R

u b ric!

F

a r E

x c

e e

d s

S ta

n d

a rd

s

E x

c e

e d

s S

ta n

d a

rd s

M

e e

ts S

ta n

d a

rd s

F

a ils

to M

e e

t S ta

n d

a rd

s

1 . Id

e n

tific a

tio n

o f C

ritic a

l Is

s u

e s

a n

d F

a c

to rs

; D e

p th

o

f A n

a ly

s is

I w

ill co n

sid e

r ho w

d e

ta ile

d yo u

r a

n a

lysis is, h o

w fa

r in to d

e p

th you g

o , a

n d

w h

e th

e r yo

u

a d

d re

ss a ll o

f th e e

xistin g a

n d

critica

l issu e

s in th

e ca

se .

Id e

n tifie

s all of th e

critica l

issu e

s. T h

o ro

u g

h ly d

iscu sse

s, e

va lu

a te

s, a n

d a

n a

lyze s e

a ch

issu

e , p

ro vid

in g

co n

vin cin

g

a n

d su

p p

o rte

d a

rg u

m e

n ts.

Id e

n tifie

s m o

st o f th

e critica

l issu

e s. D

iscu sse

s, e va

lu a

te s,

a n

d a

n a

lyze s e

a ch

m a

n a

g e

ria l

issu e

, p ro

vid in

g co n

vin cin

g a

n d

su

p p

o rte

d a

rg u

m e

n ts, b

u t co

u ld

h

a ve

g o

n e

in to

m o

re d

e p

th .

Id e

n tifie

s so m

e o

f th e

critica l

issu e

s. D iscu

sse s, e

va lu

a te

s, a

n d

a n

a lyze

s so m

e o

f th e

m

a n

a g

e ria

l issu e

s, p ro

vid in

g

so m

e w

h a

t co n

vin cin

g a

n d

su

p p

o rte

d a rg

u m

e n

ts, b u

t sh o

u ld

h

a ve

g o

n e

in to

m u

ch m o

re

d e

p th

.

Id e

n tifie

s fe w

, if a n

y, critica l issu

e s.

F a

ils to d

iscu ss, e

va lu

a te

, a n

d a

n a

lyze

e a

ch issu

e , d

o e

s n o

t p ro

vid e

co

n vin

cin g

o r su

p p

o rte

d a rg

u m

e n

ts, a

n d

la cks a

n y sig

n ifica

n t d

e g

re e

o f

d e

p th

.

S e

c tio

n 1

S c

o re

: (1

7 -1

8 )

(1 5

-1 6

) (1

3 -1

4 )

(1 2

o r L

e s

s )

2 . A

n a

ly s

is o

f th e

c u

rre n

t c

o m

p e

titiv e

e n

v iro

n m

e n

t Id

e n

tifie s a

ll o f th

e p

a rtie

s im

p a

cte d

b y th

e issu

e .

T h

o ro

u g

h ly d

iscu sse

s, e

va lu

a te

s, a n

d a

n a

lyze s th

e

im p

a ct, b

a se

d o

n P

o rte

r’s F ive

F

o rce

s M o

d e

l: th e

th re

a t o

f su

b stitu

te p

ro d

u cts/se

rvice s,

e sta

b lish

e d

riva ls, a

n d

n e

w

e n

tra n

ts; a n

d th

e b

a rg

a in

in g

p

o w

e r o

f su p

p lie

rs a n

d o

f cu

sto m

e rs.

Id e

n tifie

s m o

st o f th

e p

a rtie

s im

p a

cte d b

y th e

issu e

. T

h o

ro u

g h

ly d iscu

sse s, e

va lu

a te

s, a

n d

a n

a lyze

s th e

im p

a ct, b

a se

d

o n

P o

rte r’s F

ive F

o rce

s M o

d e

l, b

u t co

u ld

h a

ve g

o n

e m

o re

in to

d

e p

th .

Id e

n tifie

s so m

e o

f th e

p a

rtie s

im p

a cte

d b y th

e issu

e .

D iscu

sse s, e

va lu

a te

s, a n

d

a n

a lyze

s a fe

w o

f th e

im p

a cts,

b a

se d

o n

P o

rte r’s F

ive F

o rce

s M

o d

e l, b

u t sh

o u

ld h

a ve

g o

n e

m

u ch

m o

re in

to d

e p

th .

Id e

n tifie

s fe w

o f th

e p

a rtie

s im p

a cte

d b

y th e

issu e

. D o

e s n

o t d

iscu ss,

e va

lu a

te , o

r a n

a lyze

th e

im p

a ct, b

a se

d

o n

P o

rte r’s F

ive F

o rce

s M o

d e

l.

S e

c tio

n 2

S c

o re

: (1

7 -1

8 )

(1 5

-1 6

) (1

3 -1

4 )

(1 2

o r L

e s

s )

3 : G

e n

e ra

te s

A lte

rn a

tiv e

s

a n

d R

e c

o m

m e

n d

a tio

n s

;

G e

n e

ra te

s se ve

ra l h

ig h

-q u

a lity

a lte

rn a

tive so

lu tio

n s;

R e

co m

m e

n d

a tio

n s a

re w

e ll-

a rg

u e

d a

n d

b a

se d

o n

th

o ro

u g

h a

n a

lysis.

G e

n e

ra te

s tw o

o r m

o re

h ig

h -

q u

a lity a

lte rn

a tive

so lu

tio n

s; R

e co

m m

e n

d a

tio n

s a re

fu lly

su p

p o

rte d

by th e

a n

a lysis.

G e

n e

ra te

s o n

e o

r tw o

a lte

rn a

tive

so lu

tio n

s; R e

co m

m e

n d

a tio

n s a

re

n o

t fu lly su

p p

o rte

d b y th

e

a n

a lysis.

P ro

p o

se s n

o a

lte rn

a tive

so lu

tio n

(s).

S e

c tio

n 3

S c

o re

: (1

7 -1

8

(1 5

-1 6

) (1

3 -1

4 )

(1 2

o r L

e s

s )

4 : D

e v

e lo

p s

a P

la n

o f

A c

tio n

fo r Im

p le

m e

n tin

g

R e

c o

m m

e n

d a

tio n

s

D e

ve lo

p s a

th o

ro u

g h

, p la

u sib

le

p la

n fo

r im p

le m

e n

tin g

th e

p

ro p

o se

d so

lu tio

n s; D

iscu sse

s p

o te

n tia

l p ro

b le

m s w

ith th

e

im p

le m

e n

ta tion

a n

d d

e ve

lo p

s a

va rie

ty o f q

u a

lity su g

g e

stio n

s fo r

m in

im izin

g th

e m

.

D e

ve lo

p s a

n a

d e

q u

a te

p la

n fo

r im

p le

m e

n ting

th e

p ro

p o

se d

so

lu tio

n s; D

iscu sse

s p o

te n

tia l

p ro

b le

m s w

ith th

e

im p

le m

e n

ta tion

a n

d d

e ve

lo p

s a

fe w

su g

g e

stio n

s fo r m

in im

izin g

th

e m

.

A ckn

o w

le d

g e

s p o

te n

tia l

p ro

b le

m s w

ith im

p le

m e

n ta

tio n

, b

u t d

o e

s n o

t a d

e q

u a

te ly a

d d

re ss

m itig

a tio

n ; T

h e

lin k b

e tw

e e

n th

e

p ro

b le

m a

n d

th e

a ctio

n p

la n

is still lo

g ica

lly co n

siste n

t.

D o

e s n

o t d

e ve

lo p

a n

a ctio

n p

la n

; o r it

is in co

m p

le te

, va g

u e

," o r u

n re

a listic fo

r im

p le

m e

n tin

g th

e p

ro p

o se

d so

lu tio

n .

S e

c tio

n 4

S c

o re

: (1

7 -1

8 )

(1 5

-1 6

) (1

3 -1

4 )

(1 2

o r L

e s

s )

5: G lo

b alizatio

n an

d

C u

ltu ral D

iversity

C o

n sid

e rs m

a n

y m

u ltid

iscip lin

a ry p

e rsp

e ctive

s e

m p

lo ye

d to

a d

d re

ss g lo

b a

l issu

e s; D

e scrib

e s g

lo b

a l

in te

rd e

p e

n d

e n

ce a

n d

its im

p a

cts ve ry w

e ll; a

n d

A

rticu la

te s a

co m

p le

te

u n

d e

rsta n

d in

g o

f cu ltu

ra l

d iffe

re n

ce s.

C o

n sid

e rs a m

in im

u m

o f 2

-3

m u

ltid iscip

lin a

ry p e

rsp e

ctive s

e m

p lo

ye d

to a

d d

re ss g

lo b

a l

issu e

s; A d

e q

u a

te ly d

e scrib

e s

g lo

b a

l in te

rd e

p e

n d

e n

ce a

n d

its im

p a

cts; A rticu

la te

s a n

u

n d

e rsta

n d

in g

o f so

m e

o f th

e

cu ltu

ra l d

iffe re

n ce

s.

C o

n sid

e rs o

n ly 1

m u

ltid iscip

lin a

ry p

e rsp

e ctive

e m

p lo

ye d

to a

d d

re ss

g lo

b a

l issu e

s; A tte

m p

ts to

d e

scrib e

g lo

b a

l in te

rd e

p e

n d

e n

ce

a n

d its im

p a

cts; E xh

ib its a

lim ite

d

u n

d e

rsta n

d in

g o

f cu ltu

ra l

d iffe

re n

ce s.

D o

e s n

o t co

n sid

e r m

u ltid

iscip lin

a ry

p e

rsp e

ctive s to

a d

d re

ss g lo

b a

l issu e

s; D

o e

s n o

t a d

e q

u a

te ly d

e scrib

e g

lo b

a l

in te

rd e

p e

n d

e n

ce a

n d

its im p

a cts;

E xh

ib its n

o u

n d

e rsta

n d

in g

o f cu

ltu ra

l d

iffe re

n ce

s.

S ectio

n 5 S

co re:

(17-18) (15-16)

(13-14) (12 o

r L ess)

T u

rn itin

.co m

S im

ilarity R

atin g

S

tu d

e nt su

b m

its a p

a p

e r th

a t

sco re

s a lo

w sim

ila rity ra

tin g

(b

e lo

w 2

5 %

), in d

ica ting

a h

ig h

d

e g

re e

o f o

rig in

a lity of th

e

stu d

e n

t’s w o

rk.

S tu

d e

nt su b

m its a

p a

p e

r th a

t sco

re s a

m id

-ra n

g e

sim ila

rity ra

tin g

(b e

tw e

e n

2 5

a n

d 5

0 %

).

S tu

d e

nt su b

m its a

p a

p e

r th a

t sco

re s a

ra th

e r h

ig h

sim ila

rity ra

tin g

(b e

tw e

e n

5 0

% a

n d

7 5

% ).

S u

ch p

a p

e rs m

a y b

e in

ve stig

a te

d

a n

d a

d m

in istra

tive a

ctio n

m a

y b e

ta

ke n

.

S tu

d e

nt su b

m its a

p a

p e

r th a

t sco re

s a

h ig

h sim

ila rity ra

tin g

(a b

o ve

7 5

% ),

su g

g e

stin g

th a

t th e

re co

u ld

b e

a n

issu

e w

ith p

la g

ia rism

. S

u ch

p a

p e

rs w ill b

e in

ve stig

a te

d a

n d

a

d m

in istra

tive a

ctio n

m a

y b e

ta ke

n .

T u

rn itin

R atin

g :

(5) (4)

(3) (0)

O verall Q

u ality o

f W

ritten C

o m

m u

n icatio

n

$$$!

S tu

d e

n t p

re se

n te

d a

w e

ll- w

ritte n

, co h

e re

n t a

n a

lysis th a

t w

a s fre

e fro

m a

n y g

ra m

m a

r a

n d

/o r sp

e llin

g e

rro rs.

S tu

d e

n t p

re se

n te

d a

w e

ll-w ritte

n ,

co h

e re

n t a

n a

lysis th a

t co n

ta in

e d

a

fe w

m in

o r e

rro rs.

S tu

d e

n t p

re se

n te

d a

so m

e w

h a

t co

h e

re n

t, b u

t la ckin

g a

n a

lysis th

a t co

n ta

in e

d se

ve ra

l m in

o r

e rro

rs.

S tu

d e

n t p

re se

n te

d a

n in

co h

e re

n t

a n

a lysis th

a t co

n ta

in e

d se

ve ra

l m a

jo r

e rro

rs.

C o

m m

u n

icatio n

S co

re: (5)

(4) (3)

(0-2)

T o

tal S co

re (o u

t o f 100):!

! !

! !

!