Siciology and psychology assignments for Phyllis Young

profileangelina_2
where_have_we_been_essay_rubric-2.doc

Rubric: Where Have We Been? Where Are We Going?

Criteria

Advanced

Proficient

Adequate

Inadequate

Score

Thesis

Student posited a concise, clearly stated thesis that demonstrated a thorough understanding of the topic.

(24-25 points)

Student posed a concise, clearly stated thesis. Thesis showed an understanding of the topic.

(22-23 points)

Student developed a thesis somewhat lacking clarity. The student’s understanding of the topic was questionable.

(19-21 points)

Student developed a thesis completely lacking in clarity. Student’s lack of understanding of the topic is abundant.

(0-18 points)

25

Quality of Information

Student utilized information from a range of sources. ALL of the sources were high quality, relevant, academic/scholarly resources related to topic.

(28-30 points)

Student obtained a range of material. MOST of the material was of scholarly, high quality, relevant resources & related to topic.

(25-27 points)

Student utilized from a limited amount of sources with a minimal amount very little quality as related to topic.

(19-24 points)

Student gathered information that lacked relevance, quality, depth and balance.

(0-18 points)

30

Mechanics

No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

(15 points)

Almost no grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

(10-14 points)

A few grammatical spelling, or punctuation errors.

(5-9 points)

Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.

(0-4 points)

15

Analysis of Information

Student analyzed made conclusions, which are supported by evidence. The student's voice is apparent.

(24-25 points)

Student demonstrated a significant effort in examining the facts and evidence presented.

(20-23 points)

Student's conclusions could be supported by stronger/clearly cited evidence.

(15-19 points)

Student's conclusions simply involved restating information. Conclusions were not supported by evidence.

(0-14 points)

25

Overall Product

Student effectively communicated an analysis that demonstrated an attention to detail and academic excellence.

(5 points)

Student effectively communicated thoughts and relevant information in a manner that was neat and orderly.

(3-4 points)

Student communication was not effective. Product presentation was untidy and disorganized.

(1-2 points)

Student’s product does not effectively communicate analysis and was presented in disorder.

(0 points)

5

Total

100 points