Siciology and psychology assignments for Phyllis Young
Rubric: Where Have We Been? Where Are We Going?
|
Criteria |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Adequate |
Inadequate |
Score |
|
Thesis |
Student posited a concise, clearly stated thesis that demonstrated a thorough understanding of the topic. (24-25 points) |
Student posed a concise, clearly stated thesis. Thesis showed an understanding of the topic. (22-23 points) |
Student developed a thesis somewhat lacking clarity. The student’s understanding of the topic was questionable. (19-21 points) |
Student developed a thesis completely lacking in clarity. Student’s lack of understanding of the topic is abundant. (0-18 points) |
25 |
|
Quality of Information |
Student utilized information from a range of sources. ALL of the sources were high quality, relevant, academic/scholarly resources related to topic. (28-30 points) |
Student obtained a range of material. MOST of the material was of scholarly, high quality, relevant resources & related to topic. (25-27 points) |
Student utilized from a limited amount of sources with a minimal amount very little quality as related to topic. (19-24 points) |
Student gathered information that lacked relevance, quality, depth and balance. (0-18 points)
|
30 |
|
Mechanics |
No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. (15 points) |
Almost no grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. (10-14 points) |
A few grammatical spelling, or punctuation errors. (5-9 points) |
Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. (0-4 points) |
15 |
|
Analysis of Information |
Student analyzed made conclusions, which are supported by evidence. The student's voice is apparent. (24-25 points) |
Student demonstrated a significant effort in examining the facts and evidence presented. (20-23 points) |
Student's conclusions could be supported by stronger/clearly cited evidence. (15-19 points) |
Student's conclusions simply involved restating information. Conclusions were not supported by evidence. (0-14 points) |
25 |
|
Overall Product |
Student effectively communicated an analysis that demonstrated an attention to detail and academic excellence. (5 points) |
Student effectively communicated thoughts and relevant information in a manner that was neat and orderly. (3-4 points) |
Student communication was not effective. Product presentation was untidy and disorganized. (1-2 points) |
Student’s product does not effectively communicate analysis and was presented in disorder. (0 points) |
5 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
100 points |