Complete below an analysis of three (3) diversity issues described in the attached document labeled Diversity Issues Assignment.

OLCU 425 Diversity Issues Rubric

Length: 6 pages excluding the title and Reference pages Due: Week 8 by Wednesday midnight Value: 250 Points for 25% of the final grade Post: Week 8 Assignments

Prepare and submit through Turnitin your analysis of the three (3) diversity issues posted in Week 8 Assignments. In preparing your response, discuss why you agree or disagree with the issues raised regarding diversity leadership, cross-cultural communications, and cultural intelligence. This assignment requires you to critically analyze each issue from different perspectives; support your analysis with course readings, citations from academic sources, and examples as evidence to persuasively present your conclusion. Your analysis of each diversity issue should:

 Comprehensively discuss and analyze the issue by responding to all questions posed

 Include citations (such as from your textbook, assigned readings or your research) to support your analysis and conclusions

 Use specific examples as evidence

 Persuasively argue a specific conclusion as to why you agree or disagree

 Be two (2) double-spaced pages (approximately 700 words)

 Use complete sentences, correct spelling and grammar; and adhere to APA standards

Evaluation Criteria of Diversity Issues

Report Elements Exemplary

Proficient Developing Emerging

Diversity Leadership

50 Comprehensively analyzes diversity conscious leadership by thoroughly responding to all posed questions. Supports analysis with citations and specific examples. Persuasively argues a specific conclusion.

43 Analyzes diversity conscious leadership generally responding to all posed questions. Supports analysis with some expert citations and examples.. Argues a specific conclusion providing some justification.

36 Analyzes diversity conscious leadership although some responses to posed questions may be superficial. Uses some citations and examples. States but does not justify a specific conclusion.

29 Limited if any analysis of diversity conscious leadership; may not respond to all posed questions. May provide examples but does not include citations. Unclear conclusion

Cross-Cultural Communication

50 Comprehensively analyzes cross-cultural communications by thoroughly responding to all posed questions. Supports analysis with expert citations and specific examples. Persuasively argues a specific conclusion.

43 Analyzes cross- cultural communications generally responding to all posed questions. Supports analysis with some expert citations and examples.. Argues a specific conclusion providing some justification.

36 Analyzes cross- cultural communications although some responses to posed questions may be superficial. Uses some citations and examples. States but does not justify a specific conclusion.

29 Limited if any analysis of cross- cultural communications may not respond to all posed questions. May provide examples but does not include citations. Unclear conclusion

Cultural Intelligence

50 Comprehensively analyzes cultural intelligence by

43 Analyzes cultural intelligence generally responding to all

36 Analyzes cultural intelligence although some responses to

29 Limited if any analysis of cultural intelligence may not

thoroughly responding to all posed questions. Supports analysis with expert citations and specific examples. Persuasively argues a specific conclusion.

posed questions. Supports analysis with some expert citations and examples.. Argues a specific conclusion providing some justification.

posed questions may be superficial. Uses some citations and examples. States but does not justify a specific conclusion.

respond to all posed questions. May provide examples but does not include citations. Unclear conclusion

Critical Analysis

50 Consistently employs critical analysis and thinking in discussing the issues. Each response is through, logical and well- constructed.Effectively synthesizes different perspectives to draw a strong conclusion

43 Often employs critical analysis and thinking in discussing the issues. Each response is fairly through, logical and well-constructed. Attempts to integrate different perspectives to draw a conclusion

36 Somewhat employs critical analysis and thinking in discussing the issues. Responses are somewhat, logical but may not be well- constructed. Limited integration of different perspectives to draw a conclusion

29 Little if any critical analysis and thinking used in discussing the issues. Responses may be illogical and/or poorly constructed. Limited if any consideration of different perspectives

Organization and Writing Mechanic

50 Each response is concise, clearly written and approximately 700 words. Sentences are complete and well- constructed. Spelling, grammar and punctuation is correct. APA standards are followed without any errors.

43 Each response is fairly complete, fairly clearly written and approximately 700 words. There may be a few minor errors in sentence structure, grammar, spelling, punctuation and/or APA

36 Responses are somewhat concise and clear. Paper may be 10% too long or short. There may be numerous errors in sentence structure, grammar, spelling, punctuation and/or APA

29 Responses are unclear and/or miss the point. Paper may be 15% too long or short. There may be multiple errors in sentence structure, grammar, spelling, punctuation and/or APA