Creat a Roadmap (Katetutor only)
RR 08/.DS_Store
__MACOSX/RR 08/._.DS_Store
RR 08/381-385.zip
Image_1456166619266.png
Image_1456166628706.png
Image_1456166636105.png
Image_1456166645553.png
Image_1456166662932.png
__MACOSX/RR 08/._381-385.zip
RR 08/Student Example - Roadmap Analysis(1).pdf
Roadmap Student Example
Student Name
Due Date
WR122-Brown
RR8: Synthesizing Ideas & Roadmap
Part I: Guiding Questions
Student answers withheld
Part II: Roadmap
I. Topic: E-Readers in the publishing industry
Thesis: Electronic readers have revolutionized the publishing industry, making way for small, independent publishing houses to
flourish by attracting new authors and new readers.
II. History of Publishing Industry & E-Readers (background of the topic)
III. Supporting Topic #1: Small independent publishing houses
A. Support: Printing was expensive – E-readers create freedom from corporate control, publishers can take risks
B. Counterargument: The “Big 6” publishers are successful for a reason – proven success and talent
C. Rebuttal: Both independent and conglomerate publishers can create success for authors with E-readers, but the chances of
a conglomerate taking the risk is highly unlikely.
IV. Supporting Topic #2: Attracting New Authors
A. Support: Authors can keep control of their own work, publishers can take more risks with authors who are not “mainstream”
B. Counterargument: Unprofessional publishers “print” any author’s work since e-readers are “easy” and inexpensive
C. Rebuttal: Small publishers does not mean a decreased audience since E-readers allow all types of work to be made available,
while traditional publishing requires hardcopies to be purchased and placed on the shelf (eg: high risk)
V. Supporting Argument #3: Attracting New Readers
A. Support: E-Readers are flexible, trendy, and reach a new audience of readers
B. Counterargument: Traditional publishing does not very often break the mold
C. Rebuttal: Small publishing houses can prepare work, especially for E-readers, ad get the right to the right readership. Indie
publishing houses typically have a different type of following and those who use E-Readers are part of that following.
VII. Concluding Thoughts:
What goals do you have for the paper?: I would like to prove that E-readers can make independent publishing houses more
successful and meet the needs of a niche group of readers and writes that large conglomerate publishers cannot. Keeping with the
“old” way of publishing limits readership and authorship.
What would you like to convince your readers to do or believe after reading your paper?: I would like to convince readers to
agree with the idea that E-Readers have revolutionized the publishing industry by making it possible for all types of authors to get
published and to reach their intended readers without having to use traditional publishing, printing, and marketing methods. The
major publishing houses often miss out on many capable authors when not taking risks or relying on what is “popular” at that
particular moment. E-Readers reach the needs of a new era of publishing and reading.
The outline discovery draft utilizes the thesis statement to guide the organization of the paper. The following example uses the following thesis
statement: Electronic readers have revolutionized the publishing industry, making way for small, independent publishing houses to flourish by attracting new authors and new readers. This particular outline example includes the counterarguments and rebuttals in the same section as the support, which makes for a strong
organizational pattern. Notice that the outline follows the organization of the thesis statement and each section has a title that introduces what
topic will be discussed in that section. Each section of support in the thesis statement is color coded, which makes it simple to follow the
structure of the outline.
__MACOSX/RR 08/._Student Example - Roadmap Analysis(1).pdf
RR 08/Template RR 08.odt
Thumbnails/thumbnail.png
Name
Due Date
RR8: Synthesizing Ideas & Roadmap
Part I: Guiding Questions
Part II: Roadmap
I. Topic:
Thesis:
(Thesis suggestion: color code the thesis statement to align with the supporting topics included in the body sections below.)
-
History of
III. Supporting topic #1:
A. Support:
B. Counterargument:
C. Rebuttal:
IV. Supporting topic #2:
A. Support:
B. Counterargument:
C. Rebuttal:
V. Supporting topic #3:
A. Support:
B. Counterargument:
C. Rebuttal:
VI. . Supporting topic #4:
A. Support:
B. Counterargument:
C. Rebuttal:VII. Concluding Thoughts
-
What would you like people understand after reading your paper?
RR 08/Unit2 Roadmap Instruction.odt
Thumbnails/thumbnail.png
Assignment Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness of synthesis in research writing. Create a basic organizational pattern for the analysis essay based on the three prong thesis statement.
Textbook Reading: p. 381-385 (Attached)
Template: RR 08 (Attached)
Student Example: Creating a Roadmap Example Attached
I. Guiding Questions:
Students often struggle with moving from summary to synthesis. Synthesis brings "together material from various sources in order to create something new" (p. 381) and "when you work with your sources in this way, you can count on your ideas to grow..." (p. 384). How does synthesis, over summary, benefit the overall impact of a paper? What new ideas have you already developed about your topic?
1-2 paragraph response (1 paragraph = 5-8 sentences)
II. Create a Roadmap:
The roadmap, which we also created in Unit 1, allows you to quickly capture your ideas which helps ensure a complete and well-organized document. This time around, you have the previous research writing experience to consider how you will synthesize the ideas presented in the preliminary research articles and tie that information to your own opinions on the topic.
Effective writers organize their thoughts before they organize their documents. The roadmap encourages brevity and clarity, frees you to generate ideas first, before focusing on formal outlines or writing perfect sentence), and captures ideas quickly. The flexibility of a roadmap lets you work with your ideas on the most basic level, allowing you to "brainstorm" for complete content and "try out" different organizational patterns. Think of it as brainstorming for the outline of your paper.
To get started, click on the template and student example linked above. You will find an organization pattern and guiding topics to build your discovery draft. Complete sentences are not necessary (actually, please avoid them!). If you find that you do not need each of the sections, delete them. If you find that you need more sections, add them. This is your discovery draft, develop it to benefit the goals you have in mind for your paper.
Tip: Use the color coding system shown in the student example and template.